(no subject)
Sep. 4th, 2007 05:50 pmThe current state of fashion is annying the crap out of me. It's basically the worst of the 80s. Eveything is tight in the wrong places and loose in the wrong places and the only thing I've seen in stores that I've liked in months is this pair of hideous little ankle boots at H&M that my inner Snape just adores, god help us all.
It's not that I need new clothes. It's that I want to look at less ugly.
It's not that I need new clothes. It's that I want to look at less ugly.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 09:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 10:04 pm (UTC)seriously, i can't even GO clothes shopping anymore. to be fair, i've always hated clothes shopping, but it just gets worse and worse.
(yes, you struck a nerve, LOL...)
no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 10:07 pm (UTC)I hear ya
Date: 2007-09-04 10:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 10:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 10:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 11:31 pm (UTC)And why, God, why did they bring back the oversized message tee? I thought we might finally be done with the crappy screenprint Seventies tees, but argh!
And of course all this tunic-and-leggings crap looks ridiculous while sitting down, which is most of what I do these days. My only consolation there is that at least the baggy tunics might put an end to both biscuit roll and skanky denim with rhinestone messages on the ass.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-05 12:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-05 01:07 am (UTC)I know there was at least one fall catalog that had stuff in it that made me think of you (in the "wow, that really looks like something
Things are looking better for Fall/Winter, IMHO.
I am with you
Date: 2007-09-05 06:08 am (UTC)Excuse me while I go to bed and wear somthing that fits me...my birthday suit.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-05 01:17 pm (UTC)Re: The new empire waist. I did purchase a smock dress at Old Navy for 15.00, and added tiny crocheted belt loops to make it an empire waist. It actually worked well. I'm obsessed with anything Regency (speaking of, New Amsterdam is filming 1813 this week) and always buy anything reminiscent.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-05 01:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-05 01:33 pm (UTC)BF is working on it--he is a huge Regency-phile as well. I'm not an actor, and not SAG, but would have loved to do it for the period. Doing a commercial instead though...
Same with short hair on a woman. Rare, but not anachronistic. I thought that their requests were strange as well, considering, you have an easy hair length to just add a piece to create a Regency updo. If I were running the hair dept., I would have wanted shorter hair, so I could prestyle hair peices and attach them.
Now you truly know the intense geekery that I have for period hair.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-05 01:36 pm (UTC)And you're right, that men's hair is totally wrong. It's like peopel watch Horatio Hornblower and decide that 1795 and 1815 were the same year. So not.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-05 02:00 pm (UTC)I just built a wig for an Amazon book commercial. I will have to post a pic in the eljay. Super fun 1818 hair.
I'd love to do a Regency ball. It was one of the things I wanted to do when moving to NY. In Ohio, all we have are CW reenactments, and some weak RW events. :( I just don't have Regency wardrobe. Same with BF. He has tons of CW and one RW, but no Regency. Is it dress code strict?
no subject
Date: 2007-09-05 02:04 pm (UTC)http://www.elegantarts.org/assembly/