rm: (complete)
rm ([personal profile] rm) wrote2008-05-16 10:37 am

LJ Advisory Board

Well, I've been officially certified as a candidate in the LJ Advisory Board Election and I've been offered the opportunity to talk a little bit about where I stand in a post that will be linked to from the poll.


Four questions were suggested to all the candidates for this post, and since this isn't a format I've pursued before, I decided to run with it.

As some of you know, I will actually be in Sicily for the next week (I leave later today), so my access may be sporadic during that time, but what online time I have will be dedicated to this election process, which I believe has the potential to make LJ a better place regardless of the outcome.


What do you think is the value of LJ?

For me personally, LJ has been a way to stay in touch with friends, hone my writing and document my life for myself, and at least intermittently, for the amusement of others. I met my partner here. I found support when I was diagnosed with a rather unpleasant genetic disease. And I have fun talking about the things I'm passionate about from fencing to fandom.

While those LJ experiences are far from uncommon, they don't even begin to speak to the totality of LJ's value both as a platform for personal expression and a tool for community development. LJ gives the user the unique ability to feel both less alone in the world and more singular, whether on issues serious or trivial.

LJ allows users to experience both the world as they wish it to be, through connections with like-minded individuals, and to witness the world as it is through exposure to those of completely different circumstances and views.


What changes would you like to see LJ make in the next year?

The number one issue has to be better and more respectful communications between LJ and its users. Every other concern (and there are a whole bunch we'll get to in just a second) can only be addressed if this happens. That means LJ has to recognize that users generate the content that brings in even more users that in turn generate the revenue in an ideally constant cycle. LJ's users -- free, plus and paid -- are the building blocks of the revenue model and should be treated accordingly.

What does that mean?

  • It means we need a clear TOS that is uniformly enforced.
  • It means we need communication with users whenever the TOS is updated.
  • It means we need a system for dealing with abuse and other user concerns that is transparent and allows users to present their side of the case -- justice without defense or appeal is not justice.
  • It means we need an LJ administration that recognizes and is comfortable with the diversity of its users and their interests.

    Practically, what needs to happen in the next year?

    LJ needs to finally resolve the free speech issues that began with Strikeout and Boldthrough. While as a private corporation LJ has the right to decide what type of content it will and won't allow, my argument is for the broadest range of speech permissible under the laws of California (where LJ is incorporated). This level of free speech should be the right of all LJ users, regardless of location or topic. Political speech needs to be protected. Religious speech needs to be protected. Creative speech needs to be protected. If it's legal speech it should be permissible on LJ.

    LJ is a platform. Not a parent.

    LJ needs to address disability issues. This includes getting the ALT tag working for our visually impaired users and apologizing to users with mental health/illness issues for essentially erasing their existence from the site in the debacle with the top 100 interests list.

    LJ needs to honor its original commitments made to the users. These include the ongoing availability of free accounts and the right of every user to experience an ad-free LJ if they so choose.


    Why do you want to be the elected representative?

    To be frank, I hemmed and hawed about running at the beginning. This job is going to be hard. It's going to be time-consuming and it's going to be thankless.

    But the fact remains that I have a set of unique characteristics and credentials that make me believe I am the person who can most make the LJ powers-that-be listen.

    Why?

  • I currently have early adopter, paid and free accounts.
  • I am a professional author whose publisher advertises on the site.
  • I have an extensive professional background in public relations and marketing.
  • I have the previous experience of working for an on-line community of which I was also an active part.
  • I already have a good rapport with staff members on several of the current user concerns. At the same time, I have no personal friendships or loyalties to the staff or other powers that be.
  • I am relentless, clear, and systematic when it comes to problem solving.
  • I love LJ with all my heart, but I am not a cheerleader. I will call it like I see it, and can be both diplomatic and aggressive.
  • I am resilient.
  • I am an active and proud part of fandom (HP, Torchwood/Doctor Who, Riverside, His Dark Materials, Kushiel, etc.)

    Everything that makes me not cuddly in most circumstances makes me perfect for this job.


    What do you think are the community's greatest concerns?

    Communication. Respect. The safety to be ourselves. The right to be ourselves. What the TOS really means. Free expression. A high quality user experience. Features that work. Features that matter. Preservation of community. Preservation of LJ's unique culture. Accessibility. Usability.

    vote RM!
    Keeping LJ a place we want to be;
    Making LJ a place we want to stay.

  • [identity profile] rhonan.livejournal.com 2008-05-22 07:25 am (UTC)(link)
    Yes, that's right. She banned him because he was on a list of alleged Friendito users that was floating around, and she dropped the ban_hammer on all of them then, and has not bothered to change that now that Friendito is no longer an issue, and he is the leading candidate for the board. That, to me, speaks even more about [livejournal.com profile] rm's ease in looking down her nose at people.

    Now, since this is her journal, and she has not said anything in this thread, nor has she disabled anonymous commenting, why do you feel it is your business to jump down [livejournal.com profile] jameth's throat?

    [identity profile] shutter.livejournal.com 2008-05-22 08:07 am (UTC)(link)
    this one?

    http://goodtimz.blogspot.com/2005/04/banned-lj-user-meme.html

    i'm on there too, but i'm not banned. hmm.

    [identity profile] iworshipsatin.livejournal.com 2008-05-22 08:23 am (UTC)(link)
    I am on the list and I can comment as well.

    [identity profile] rhonan.livejournal.com 2008-05-22 09:00 am (UTC)(link)
    Gee, I'm just going by the reason she gave. I never assumed that she was afraid of [livejournal.com profile] jameth.

    [identity profile] ninaf.livejournal.com 2008-05-22 03:13 pm (UTC)(link)
    Holy crap, I am on there and I am a boring LJ user!

    [identity profile] adameros.livejournal.com 2008-05-22 03:26 pm (UTC)(link)
    I was banned to. But I can post.

    This is just a witch hunt against [livejournal.com profile] jameth.

    [livejournal.com profile] rm made a request to open dialog between candidates with a group exchange, except [livejournal.com profile] jameth was banned, and when he tried to offer up groups and take part via a third party, he was shot down by [livejournal.com profile] rm.

    Why she claims to be the "free speech" candidate escapes me, as at every turn she has worked to shut-up other candidates while pretending to want to open dialog.

    If she has to resort to banning those she disagrees with, rather than working with them to resolve issue, how is she supposed to hand working with SUP? Obama's statement concerning having dialog with enemy's applies to live journal as well.

    [identity profile] rigbys-face.livejournal.com 2008-05-22 03:53 pm (UTC)(link)
    reporting in to say, FINALLY I AM COOL ENOUGH TO BE ON A BAN LIST. OMGZ.. Etc.

    [identity profile] dryad271.livejournal.com 2008-05-22 08:18 pm (UTC)(link)
    Just checking to see if I'm banned here or not

    [identity profile] dryad271.livejournal.com 2008-05-22 08:21 pm (UTC)(link)
    oh okay then

    [identity profile] rhonan.livejournal.com 2008-05-22 10:46 pm (UTC)(link)
    Ah yes, the surest sign of a pathetic loser: responding to people in private messages, and then blocking then so they can not respond to your childish behavior. Trust me, that is not an effective way to hide your epic fail.

    You are a truly pathetic.

    [identity profile] kelism.livejournal.com 2008-05-22 10:48 pm (UTC)(link)
    I must not pay enough attention. What is this 100 interests thing you mention and why should LJ appologize to people with mental health issues?

    [identity profile] adameros.livejournal.com 2008-05-22 10:48 pm (UTC)(link)
    It speaks volumes about the ethics on both sides.

    [livejournal.com profile] jameth is for open debate and dialog between the candidates.
    [livejournal.com profile] rm is for censoring the competition.

    It's that simple.
    ext_4696: (Default)

    [identity profile] elionwyr.livejournal.com 2008-05-22 10:48 pm (UTC)(link)
    I will happily share with any interested parties the email that resulted in your being banned.

    End of discussion; have a nice day.

    [identity profile] ungarsfragile.livejournal.com 2008-05-22 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
    Um, I'm interested. I have no background in drama or trolldom.

    I'm just curious how people get banned from a journal penned by a person who is ostensibly pro free-speech and open debate. Full disclosure: I'm friends with Jameth because I think his cats are cute.

    [identity profile] vertigo1021.livejournal.com 2008-05-23 12:46 am (UTC)(link)
    I agree with what you say and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

    That is all.

    H.D.S.

    [identity profile] thecolourclear.livejournal.com 2008-05-23 12:57 am (UTC)(link)
    Hold the hay.

    There's an ACTIVE His Dark Materials fandom?

    I MUST KNOW WHERE IT IS!

    (erm, and yay for torchwood! I just finish series one last night!)

    [identity profile] hikeru.livejournal.com 2008-05-23 02:38 am (UTC)(link)
    I love hypotheticals. Except when they're used so poorly. It becomes a question between doing what's right and against what one supports versus what one supports while being the morally poor choice.

    In this instance there is a question with only one answer; moreover, it is said in an attempt to sound deep while exposing some deep-seated moral controversy. It's a poor question with slanderous intent at the helm at best. Not to mention that you're actually asking three questions and forcing half of the answers. Good job at accomplishing nothing.

    I'm also surprised at the apparent lack of self-control of Jameth. I honestly don't give a damn if he were blocked, the reasons behind it, or if the ban should ensue; what I do understand is that it's extraordinarily poor taste to answer a question asked to someone else. Especially before the person asked had a chance to answer it.

    Meanwhile, I think it's ludicrous to ask why a person would be banned from a private journal. This is essentially rm's domain (since I do notice the subdomain is indeed "http://rm.livejournal..."). I love how freedoms are always thrown in with forces. "RM supports free speech, so banning someone from her journal is hypocritical?" No; sorry, you're stupid. When I see something on TV I don't like, I change the channel; I don't protest the show and have it removed from my screen. If I don't want to hear from someone, I make it so I don't have to listen to them. They can be whomever they would like to be, but I have no reason to subjugate myself to the ideas of a person who I know I don't like.

    I don't know, nor do I care about, the reasons why Jameth was banned from anything. But I do know that assuming it's a personal attack without hearing so much a word from rm is moronic. (Especially since only those who are for Jameth are making those allegations.)

    PS to Jameth: It's nice to know that when something is gone, you're not willing to even try to get it back. Free accounts are gone; "too bad"? I like that attitude. When something goes wrong, you don't need to have any accountability in getting it back. (Or at least when something doesn't affect you.) You have your permanent account, why should you care about the free accounts? Upstanding logic you have there. You've got my vote.

    [identity profile] mistressxenobia.livejournal.com 2008-05-23 02:45 am (UTC)(link)
    I think that was the fursecution list, because I'm on that one.

    question for you

    [identity profile] bloggingsara.livejournal.com 2008-05-23 02:47 am (UTC)(link)
    I've already spoke about this in other comm's but i wanted to see what you'd do about this particular issue.

    I had a LJ acct dating back to 2000 that was inexplicably deleted. I received no warning from LJ and lost everything. I had some significant journal entries in there and I'm still pissed off about it. I emailed LJ several times about the acct being deleted and never received any feedback or help. I'm pretty much done actually journaling in LJ and only started a new acct so I could be a part of comm's like this one. I have my real journal on Blogger but I just don't trust LJ. I'm happy to vote for whomever would be respectful of users and at least warn a user before deleting their acct. I suspect I said "fuck" a few too many times or something of that nature in my journal to get it deleted.

    If you were elected to the Advisory Board, would you make sure that users didn't have their accts deleted without notice or a warning ahead of time?

    -Sara, formerly sfaithj

    [identity profile] i-read-dead-ppl.livejournal.com 2008-05-23 02:48 am (UTC)(link)
    This is really well-done. I like you :)

    I'm not certain how many votes each of us are given, but I'll probably be sending one your way :)

    [identity profile] mcfnord.livejournal.com 2008-05-23 03:00 am (UTC)(link)
    oh hi buddy *hugs*

    [identity profile] jesurgislac.livejournal.com 2008-05-23 07:50 am (UTC)(link)
    LJ needs to finally resolve the free speech issues that began with Strikeout and Boldthrough. While as a private corporation LJ has the right to decide what type of content it will and won't allow, my argument is for the broadest range of speech permissible under the laws of California (where LJ is incorporated). This level of free speech should be the right of all LJ users, regardless of location or topic. Political speech needs to be protected. Religious speech needs to be protected. Creative speech needs to be protected. If it's legal speech it should be permissible on LJ.

    Since May 2006 - the rules got changed in a 1984-like mode in late April 2006 - anyone whose default icon depicts a baby at breast is at risk of being suspended from Livejournal.

    SixApart offered as a defense that they don't believe babies should be breastfed in public, and that in any case that kind of enforcement is something that LJ Abuse do and they don't try to nitpick LJ Abuse's decisions. (LJ Abuse say that the new owners have made no change in the old rules.)

    For anyone following the anti-breastfeeding campaign by SixApart, their treatment of Livejournal users in 2007 and 2008 came a reprise: they lied, they were disrespectful, they made clear that their customer base was their advertisers and Livejournal members were product for sale, even Permanent or Paid accounts.

    I doubt that this much-touted advisory board will have any power to do anything, but it would be nice to know that members elected will use whatever voice they have to make a thorough stink about the actions by Livejournal's owners - going back to their first cleansing of Livejournal, the purging of icons deemed "obscene" because they depicted a baby at breast.

    Is this something you'll do? Or will you be strictly fannish in your interests?

    [identity profile] meowmeowbutt.livejournal.com 2008-05-23 12:52 pm (UTC)(link)
    lol what is friendito, who is that, and why am i on that list hahaha

    [identity profile] jdredd5150.livejournal.com 2008-05-23 02:09 pm (UTC)(link)
    I am on that list and about the most vitriolic thing i've ever done, apparently, is friend [livejournal.com profile] jameth, [livejournal.com profile] rfjason and a few others.

    But hey, I can still comment here, too.

    [identity profile] funnel101.livejournal.com 2008-05-23 02:30 pm (UTC)(link)
    Well, you've got my first choice vote for caring about disabilities, fandom, and being a mom.

    Page 2 of 6