rm: (complete)
rm ([personal profile] rm) wrote2008-05-16 10:37 am

LJ Advisory Board

Well, I've been officially certified as a candidate in the LJ Advisory Board Election and I've been offered the opportunity to talk a little bit about where I stand in a post that will be linked to from the poll.


Four questions were suggested to all the candidates for this post, and since this isn't a format I've pursued before, I decided to run with it.

As some of you know, I will actually be in Sicily for the next week (I leave later today), so my access may be sporadic during that time, but what online time I have will be dedicated to this election process, which I believe has the potential to make LJ a better place regardless of the outcome.


What do you think is the value of LJ?

For me personally, LJ has been a way to stay in touch with friends, hone my writing and document my life for myself, and at least intermittently, for the amusement of others. I met my partner here. I found support when I was diagnosed with a rather unpleasant genetic disease. And I have fun talking about the things I'm passionate about from fencing to fandom.

While those LJ experiences are far from uncommon, they don't even begin to speak to the totality of LJ's value both as a platform for personal expression and a tool for community development. LJ gives the user the unique ability to feel both less alone in the world and more singular, whether on issues serious or trivial.

LJ allows users to experience both the world as they wish it to be, through connections with like-minded individuals, and to witness the world as it is through exposure to those of completely different circumstances and views.


What changes would you like to see LJ make in the next year?

The number one issue has to be better and more respectful communications between LJ and its users. Every other concern (and there are a whole bunch we'll get to in just a second) can only be addressed if this happens. That means LJ has to recognize that users generate the content that brings in even more users that in turn generate the revenue in an ideally constant cycle. LJ's users -- free, plus and paid -- are the building blocks of the revenue model and should be treated accordingly.

What does that mean?

  • It means we need a clear TOS that is uniformly enforced.
  • It means we need communication with users whenever the TOS is updated.
  • It means we need a system for dealing with abuse and other user concerns that is transparent and allows users to present their side of the case -- justice without defense or appeal is not justice.
  • It means we need an LJ administration that recognizes and is comfortable with the diversity of its users and their interests.

    Practically, what needs to happen in the next year?

    LJ needs to finally resolve the free speech issues that began with Strikeout and Boldthrough. While as a private corporation LJ has the right to decide what type of content it will and won't allow, my argument is for the broadest range of speech permissible under the laws of California (where LJ is incorporated). This level of free speech should be the right of all LJ users, regardless of location or topic. Political speech needs to be protected. Religious speech needs to be protected. Creative speech needs to be protected. If it's legal speech it should be permissible on LJ.

    LJ is a platform. Not a parent.

    LJ needs to address disability issues. This includes getting the ALT tag working for our visually impaired users and apologizing to users with mental health/illness issues for essentially erasing their existence from the site in the debacle with the top 100 interests list.

    LJ needs to honor its original commitments made to the users. These include the ongoing availability of free accounts and the right of every user to experience an ad-free LJ if they so choose.


    Why do you want to be the elected representative?

    To be frank, I hemmed and hawed about running at the beginning. This job is going to be hard. It's going to be time-consuming and it's going to be thankless.

    But the fact remains that I have a set of unique characteristics and credentials that make me believe I am the person who can most make the LJ powers-that-be listen.

    Why?

  • I currently have early adopter, paid and free accounts.
  • I am a professional author whose publisher advertises on the site.
  • I have an extensive professional background in public relations and marketing.
  • I have the previous experience of working for an on-line community of which I was also an active part.
  • I already have a good rapport with staff members on several of the current user concerns. At the same time, I have no personal friendships or loyalties to the staff or other powers that be.
  • I am relentless, clear, and systematic when it comes to problem solving.
  • I love LJ with all my heart, but I am not a cheerleader. I will call it like I see it, and can be both diplomatic and aggressive.
  • I am resilient.
  • I am an active and proud part of fandom (HP, Torchwood/Doctor Who, Riverside, His Dark Materials, Kushiel, etc.)

    Everything that makes me not cuddly in most circumstances makes me perfect for this job.


    What do you think are the community's greatest concerns?

    Communication. Respect. The safety to be ourselves. The right to be ourselves. What the TOS really means. Free expression. A high quality user experience. Features that work. Features that matter. Preservation of community. Preservation of LJ's unique culture. Accessibility. Usability.

    vote RM!
    Keeping LJ a place we want to be;
    Making LJ a place we want to stay.

  • [identity profile] n-decisive.livejournal.com 2008-05-16 02:59 pm (UTC)(link)
    I found it interesting- and perhaps a bit insulting- that LJ decided to offer ribbons in honor of National Mental Health Month.

    http://news.livejournal.com/108187.html

    It's lovely that the money is going to charity, but it feels like as a demographic, we're their friends when it makes them look good and we're embarrassing when it doesn't.

    These are wonderfully informative posts. Keep up the good work!

    [identity profile] rm.livejournal.com 2008-05-16 03:02 pm (UTC)(link)
    Thank you.

    I am glad that LJ did the vgifts. One of the things I said during the 100 interests debacle over and over again was that if LJ really didn't have a problem with the groups affected they should demonstrate it by giving money to relevant organizations -- my list included everything from PFLAG to several mental health groups to the Comic Book Defense Fund.

    This stops short of the point I was trying to make and we've still not received an apology from LJ, but this at least makes the issue not invisible and the charity is getting some dosh.

    Dealing with the LJ powers that be seems to involve a lot of persistence and baby steps.

    [identity profile] punzel.livejournal.com 2008-05-16 03:51 pm (UTC)(link)
    Thank you for being willing to volunteer to do this. You are eminently qualified for this position. I have seen you model these behaviors for some years now, and I think you've been qualified for this for as long as it's been needed.

    I have consistently seen you act as a strong yet compassionate advocate for all LJ users, in fairness to all, not just where your own interest is involved.

    balticon barnstorming stuff.

    [identity profile] systris.livejournal.com 2008-05-16 04:26 pm (UTC)(link)
    wow...i think i will have to turn this into a pamphlet! do you have a press kit so i can put some bio infomation in it as well?

    [identity profile] ladyofthelog.livejournal.com 2008-05-16 04:54 pm (UTC)(link)
    This is great!

    [identity profile] feyandstrange.livejournal.com 2008-05-16 06:34 pm (UTC)(link)
    Good stuff as always - thanks.

    If you have time, can you ask the maintainers of the lj advisory community what's up with allowing people to join or watch the community? Several people who tried to join or watch after my post about the upcoming elections have reported technical difficulties such as "This community is not accepting new members".

    Danke.

    [identity profile] hikeru.livejournal.com 2008-05-16 09:02 pm (UTC)(link)
    I never thought I could agree with your ideals anymore than I already could. Yet here you've proven me wrong. :)
    You have objectivity, determination, and definites; no abstracts or avoidances here.
    Sorry for such a meaningless comment.
    (PS- Have fun in Sicily.)

    Of course,...

    [identity profile] bjohnson.livejournal.com 2008-05-17 01:28 am (UTC)(link)
    ... you have my vote.

    [identity profile] kaifoxx.livejournal.com 2008-05-17 05:00 pm (UTC)(link)
    Personally, I have my reservations on whether the Advisory Board will have much success...however, if its to have it's best opportunity, I think it's gonna need you on it.

    You have my vote.

    Good luck, and safe journey.
    moem: A computer drawing that looks like me. (Default)

    [personal profile] moem 2008-05-17 10:37 pm (UTC)(link)
    Good stuff. I'm glad I supported your nomination. You certainly have my vote, since I feel that you could actually represent me.

    [identity profile] eruditeviking.livejournal.com 2008-05-18 10:54 pm (UTC)(link)
    Very nicely written.

    [identity profile] virginia-fell.livejournal.com 2008-05-20 01:05 pm (UTC)(link)
    Found you through LJ United, and I've got to say... you list a lot of really specific things you want done. I particularly appreciate your attention for things like disability accomodation. Hasn't occurred to everyone, and it hadn't occurred to me.

    You've got my vote.

    [identity profile] amandathegreat.livejournal.com 2008-05-20 05:53 pm (UTC)(link)
    Sorry, posted a comment here I meant to post elsewhere. Apologies if that got emailed to you.

    [identity profile] rhonan.livejournal.com 2008-05-20 07:10 pm (UTC)(link)
    It is all well and good to talk about what one believes in, but what sacrifices one is willing to make are also important. Let us say you are elected to the board, and SUP give the board a choice. For this hypothetical there is no compromise, it is an either/or binary choice. Choice A gives the users the fullest rights to free speech under the laws of California, but free accounts are completely gone, and SUP moves away from open source. Choice B restores the ability for anyone to create a free account and includes a written commitment to keeping LJ actively part of the open source community, but content that is offensive in any part of the world served by LJ is a violation of the TOS, and results in the poster being banned. Which do you chose?

    (Anonymous) 2008-05-20 08:43 pm (UTC)(link)
    Choice A, for many reasons, mainly because Choice B is wide-open censorship. Have you seen some of the laws in other countries regarding Internet?

    -[livejournal.com profile] jameth (I am banned from [livejournal.com profile] rm and must post anonymously)

    (Anonymous) 2008-05-20 08:44 pm (UTC)(link)
    P.S. Free accounts are already gone.

    -[livejournal.com profile] jameth
    ext_4696: (Default)

    [identity profile] elionwyr.livejournal.com 2008-05-21 03:24 pm (UTC)(link)
    I assume you are not trying to respond for [livejournal.com profile] rm, in which case I'm not sure your response is well-advised or necessary.

    (Anonymous) 2008-05-21 04:44 pm (UTC)(link)
    That's nice. I wasn't trying to respond for anyone but myself. [livejournal.com profile] rhonan is my friend and I wanted to reply to his comment.
    ext_4696: (Default)

    [identity profile] elionwyr.livejournal.com 2008-05-21 04:48 pm (UTC)(link)
    And I respectfully submit that this is not the place to do so.

    IMO.

    Especially considering, as you pointed out, your ability to comment here has been been revoked.

    [identity profile] node-ue.livejournal.com 2008-05-21 07:51 pm (UTC)(link)
    Unless rm wants to ban anonymous comments, he has every right to comment here anonymously.
    ext_4696: (Default)

    [identity profile] elionwyr.livejournal.com 2008-05-21 08:00 pm (UTC)(link)
    Oh, absolutely.

    If he wishes to post in a place where his permission to do so has been revoked, that's his choice. And it speaks volumes about his ethics.

    [identity profile] node-ue.livejournal.com 2008-05-21 09:32 pm (UTC)(link)
    Obviously, rm has the "right" to ban anybody she likes from posting in her journal, but the fact that she would ban the leading candidate without provocation speaks volumes about her ethics.
    Edited 2008-05-21 21:34 (UTC)
    ext_4696: (Default)

    [identity profile] elionwyr.livejournal.com 2008-05-22 02:41 am (UTC)(link)
    It's been stated, in [livejournal.com profile] jameth's LJ in fact, that the banning happened several years ago.

    I appreciate your desire to defend your candidate, but you may wish to do better fact-checking in the future.

    The fact remains that it is poor form to post an answer to a question asked of someone else in a forum where one's posting privileges have been revoked.

    Last reply, on my part. Feel free to email me if you'd like; I think quite enough bandwidth has been utilized here.

    [identity profile] yellosubroutine.livejournal.com 2008-05-22 05:32 am (UTC)(link)
    No, we're all certain you painted yourself into a corner. No need to prolong it.

    [identity profile] ninjalie.livejournal.com 2008-05-22 05:37 am (UTC)(link)
    I agree, unless LJ were to start hosting us from a server in communist China.

    Page 1 of 6