1. I totally enjoyed it.
2. Really no moment of the film is as powerful as the opening title sequence, which is a thing of beauty and sorrow and hit me personally in a lot of convoluted ways.
3. That said, the Comedian's death and funeral, as well as the amazing out of sequence Dr. Manhattan back-story are spectacular.
4. Speaking of the Dr. Manhattan back-story.... if you like Doctor Who you will like this movie if only for the timey-wimey and the "all things are now" and "nothing ever ends" angles.
5. The denoument was too... eh. Too steep a slope and it felt confusing -- how had the mother survived? It wasn't awful, and the pullback to NY under reconstruction was good, but eh. If you're gonna change the ending from the original, I would have cut on Ozymandias with the snow coming down around him.
6. Ozymandias! I really, really enjoyed him, and I felt a lot of sorrow for him. Alexander the Great was my only friends in fifth grade too. That said, there's a whole essay on queerness in Moore's universes and a queering the villain issue and blah blah blah to go into there, hat I need more brain than I have right now to tackle.
7. OMG, this film essentially has canonical cosplay sex. Cracked me the fuck up in a meta way.
8. It's hard for me to grok how this film would resonate for someone younger, who didn't grow up with the spectre of nuclear war and certain fashion and music and stuff. It's so of the 80s. It's so of being 13-years-old for me. Does it feel personal and immediate and like a near horror for people that didn't grow up with that? Hell, does it feel that way to people who aren't in New York. The film very much resonated with my skittery childhood perceptions of life here in the bad old days.
9. When the gore is intense, it's intense, but it's so faithful to the original, if you've read that you can probably cope or at least know when to look away.
10. The film is sexy as hell, both overtly and covertly.
11. So where's the Ozymandias/Dr. Manhattan lonely god slash, eh?
Now, on a separate note. Did anyone else see that trailer for the Quentin Tarrantino Nazi movie? What the fucking fuck is up with that?
no subject
Date: 2009-03-09 04:05 am (UTC)but i'm curious now...
it's too late for me to respond to all points, but that opening sequence is still AMAZING!
no subject
Date: 2009-03-09 04:18 am (UTC)I really was pleasantly surprised with the movie overall, and visually, of course, it was stunning.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-09 04:22 am (UTC)arewere more concerned about the annual corn harvest than the looming specter of nuclear war.Oddly enough though, there was one scene that triggered a memory for me - that of Laurie checking out the Owlship for the first time. The combination of her sweater and her hair made me randomly flash back to being four or five and seeing my mother in something similar. Other than the use of "99 Luftballoons," that was the only definitively 80s moment for me.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-09 04:25 am (UTC)Imagine this
Date: 2009-03-09 04:36 am (UTC)The run up to the theatre doors and start unrolling,.. a red carpet! They then run back to the edge of the outside area and open the door of a regular sedan for a pretty young woman in a stunning dress. Everyone laughing they escort her up the red carpet, cameras flashing and yelling as if they were crazed fans or paparatzi.
The girl in question is one of this group of friends who finished high school a couple of years ago and she plays the role of "the Vietnamese Girl". Her gang decided she deserved a home-town red carpet treatment. SO they did it.
I am sad I missed it.
Ekatarina, who is looking forward to seeing someone she once met socially in a huge movie!
Re: Imagine this
Date: 2009-03-09 04:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-09 04:43 am (UTC)?
Date: 2009-03-09 05:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-09 05:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-09 05:26 am (UTC)Really, it's even shallower than most of his stuff.
Plus, reading the script tells me the man cannot spell to save his life.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-09 05:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-09 05:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-09 09:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-09 11:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-09 11:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-09 12:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-09 12:32 pm (UTC)There were greater problems in my household in the 80s, so the Russian Threat was low on the list.
Re: ?
Date: 2009-03-09 01:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-09 01:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-09 01:22 pm (UTC)Re: ?
Date: 2009-03-09 01:46 pm (UTC)It's pretty decent story. The movie's pacing is a bit off and the extraction of "Black Freighter" stuff was a good choice all in all. It was certainly violent, but I'll tell you one thing...Doc Manhanttan's dongle coming straight at you on a five-story IMAX screen...oh dear...
no subject
Date: 2009-03-09 01:49 pm (UTC)Regarding 8 - I felt the film kind of skated over the personal nature of the terror. The book really had an impact on me that way, but the film, not so much. I think by losing the scenes on the streets of New York and the "real people" characters there, it failed to present us with the real rawness of the situation. I hope that'll make it back with the director's cut. (I was born in 1980, so was a little too young to really be impacted, but I studied the cold war at college, and cold war paranoia is an interest of mine).
I actually didn't find it nearly as gorey as I expected it to be based on some of the reviews I've read. It felt quite clean and sterile to me (which worked within the context). I loved the fighting scenes - I loved how they'd thought of the physicality of each character and used that, really showed attention to detail. It felt like such a comic book thing, and as a huge comic nut, I appreciated that - I felt like, here is a director who understands and appreciates this medium, and I want to trust him.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-09 01:49 pm (UTC)Seemed a bit more caricature/cartoonish, but I guess that was the point to play off from the source material a bit.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-09 03:48 pm (UTC)I found a copy of the opening sequence online and can't stop (re)watching it. Amazing. When I describe Watchmen to friends who aren't familiar I say the book is about what would really happen if a super-being suddenly arrived on the scene in post-war America; the sense of it is captured almost perfectly by the intro (and to an ever-decreasing amount through the rest of the film, I think).
no subject
Date: 2009-03-09 03:49 pm (UTC)Sadly, the copy I found online and was watching over and over has been taken down.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 12:39 am (UTC)I really look forward to the expansion of 6, since Ozymandias never struck me as particularly queer, just European and intellectual and therefore distanced from the Red-Blooded American Male stereotype. (Framing him with David Bowie in the opening sequence puts a bit of the lie to that, though, I suppose...)
"Queerness in Moore's Universes" has a lot of ground to cover. I mean, even queerness in Watchmen (the book version) has a lot of ground to cover. Three overtly queer members of the Minutemen, and Mr. Purple Intellectual with the very triangular logo...
Villainy in Watchmen is also, well, murky. With Rorschach and the Comedian doing their contrasting bigoted fascist routines, and the retirees fulfilling the nice but spineless do-gooders role, I've always rather walked away from it with the message, "Don't act like any of these people! Or do, because in the end even inaction is a choice, but accept that any significant action you take will, in some way, be wrong."
Anyway. Looking forward to the discussion when you have the spare brain cells.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 12:46 am (UTC)As to the queerness, the movie repeatedly makes this Ozymandias gay gay gay -- there's the Bowie thing, there's also the other file on his desktop towards the end: "boys" and the purple triangle, etc. The movie definitely sets him up as queer, and I like him as queer in a lot of ways -- powerful, smart and disinterested in it. With the Alexander the Great thing it's a natural fit. But as much as he's not quite a villain, it still feels like a sloppy queering the villain thing, but I'm not sure who to blame -- Moore (who does both awesome and really problematic things with queer content) or the script folks.
Generally I find Moore has a lot of generosity for lesbians (even if they all die horrible tragic deaths, they're these very stereotypically male, filled with honour deaths in a lot of ways), and not as much for gay men, and I'm uncomfortable with it, not just as as queer person who doesn't like my brothers getting stuck with Moore's issues, but as a genderqueer person who takes it a bit personally.
On the other hand, Moore tends to do really fascinating stuff when he implies genderqueerness (V for Vendetta), so I just don't know.
I mean it sucks to have to do this sort of analysis. I want there to be enough queer heroes and villains that it doesn't matter, but the material was written long enough ago, and in the hands of a very mainstream director, I think it has to be analyzed.
What also struck me about both this and V for Vendetta is how much the expectation of extreme violence against queer folk seems normal to me. It's the fear I grew up with. For a lot of my younger friends, it's not visceral and personal when these things happen in Moore's universes.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 03:47 pm (UTC)I confess myself guilty of not reading the work distinct from what I know of the author's life, including the fact that he's done some good queer activism and that he's poly and political about it. I know "queer people must die" is one of those Things That Happens Too Often In Literature, but I always read his versions of it as coming from a deep sympathy for the reality of hate crimes.
I hadn't seen the sympathy slant, but I wasn't reading closely for it; I just hadn't noticed anything pissing me off. For every Silhouette, I remember a Hooded Justice, for every Valerie a Gordon.
Must go take that census and see what shakes out.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 08:26 pm (UTC)http://pixelatedgeek.com/2009/03/watchmen-opening-credits-video/
Truly amazing.
Susan
http://www.rixosous.com
no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 10:53 pm (UTC)Speaking from the comic book -- haven't yet seen the movie -- hell, yes. I grew up not expecting to live to be twenty. When I first read the comic I cheered for Ozy (which I might not have done had I been in NY, but remembering 80's me, I might have) because he managed to get the body count down to a few million.
The sudden global goodwill, common-enemy stuff wasted.
Date: 2009-03-11 06:23 am (UTC)I've caught myself missing Nixon during the last eight years.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-11 06:32 am (UTC)(Is anybody at all familiar with those, or should grandpops shut up now?)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-11 06:05 pm (UTC)Yes.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-12 03:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-12 06:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-12 06:09 am (UTC)is!was!no subject
Date: 2009-03-12 11:58 am (UTC)I have read and reread the book/graphic novel many many times since it came out in the 80s and spent the whole movie nodding, smiling and thinking, "Yes. This." They may have left out huge chunks and changed the ending but, to be honest, those parts of the book would not work well in a film IMO. Also, what they made into the film WORKS and is a great movie. IMO.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-13 09:32 pm (UTC)Book/Graphic Novel-these are just ways of distancing comics that are deemed "intellectual" or "groundbreaking" from the medium of comics in general. It really upsets me. A lot. Anytime anyone likes a series of comics all of a sudden they call it a goddamn graphic novel or a book. Argh Argh Argh!
Sorry to invade your journal with my number one geek pet peeve :)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-13 09:35 pm (UTC)Since comics aren't my preferred medium (I don't really respond to animation either), I don't generally know what the current language is for it, or what those choices mean, so it's good to know.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-15 04:10 am (UTC)The 80s-ness of the movie and Cold War terror was astounding.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-16 04:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-18 07:00 pm (UTC)