[personal profile] rm
Man, the history of marriage laws in California is deeply bizarre.

(So is trying to sort out all the crazy racist laws of the late 1800s -- gaaaah!)

Date: 2009-05-18 08:29 pm (UTC)
ext_3685: Stylized electric-blue teapot, with blue text caption "Brewster North" (politics (us))
From: [identity profile] brewsternorth.livejournal.com
Yeah, I barely scratched the surface of that particular bit of history during my degree and it was enough to make me go omgwtfbbq.

Date: 2009-05-18 08:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rm.livejournal.com
I am freaking out. It was sort of a lark that this story wound up here, and now I'm just engrossed in various horrifying weirdnesses including the legal age of marriage for girls (12 without parental permissions; 7 with, as far as I can find); the fact that multiple redundant laws were passed barring intermarriage of "Mongolians" which referred to Asians in general; and the much higher prevalence than I had realized of footbinding in San Francisco pre-1900.

Date: 2009-05-18 08:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eumelia.livejournal.com
I'm really dying to read this story :)

Date: 2009-05-18 08:37 pm (UTC)
ext_3685: Stylized electric-blue teapot, with blue text caption "Brewster North" (mind the gap)
From: [identity profile] brewsternorth.livejournal.com
@_@ I see what you mean. (I'll be intrigued to know the result of these researches, though.)

Date: 2009-05-18 08:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tdanaher.livejournal.com
How prevalent had you thought footbinding was? I'd always thought it was pretty prevalent pre-1900.

Date: 2009-05-18 08:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rm.livejournal.com
I didn't realize it came to the US to the degree that it did. I certainly wasn't expected estimates of over 50% of Chinese girls in SF in the 1890s.

Date: 2009-05-18 08:40 pm (UTC)
contrarywise: Glowing green trees along a road (jack!)
From: [personal profile] contrarywise
Bloody hell.

Date: 2009-05-18 10:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stardragonca.livejournal.com
My impression was that it was ubiquitous at the time.

Date: 2009-05-18 11:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rm.livejournal.com
Footbinding originated in the higher classes, as such, I assumed that in an immigrant population where all family members were often needed to work that the rates would be significantly lower -- but they weren't, except in the Chinese sub-groups that had already banned the practice.

Date: 2009-05-19 12:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stardragonca.livejournal.com
Racist laws in California continued well into my own lifetime, and it would not surprise me if some were still on the books, though rendered null and void by other State legislation or by Federal statute. Georgia only got around to finally legalising biracial marriage in 2000, so it wouldn't be at all surprising.

Date: 2009-05-19 12:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stardragonca.livejournal.com
Much smaller marriage pool.:(

Date: 2009-05-19 02:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gina-r-snape.livejournal.com
Extraordinary. I've never thought about foot binding at all in relation to the Chinese immigrant population in CA. It simply never occurred to me that they would continue the practice here--especially considering the ratio of men to women being so skewed with the Chinese Exclusion Act.

February 2021

S M T W T F S
 123456
789 10111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 29th, 2026 09:57 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios