sundries
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
ETA: Whatever happened there is clearly more ambiguous. A test done by the folks at Dreamwidth (which uses the same base code) says that what the user says happened couldn't have happened, which means that the ratio of code glitch/bad behavior appears to be different than the user who had the negative interaction with LJ staff (reasonably, considering history) assumed.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
Essex, the town, was about what you'd expect - unbearably charming, ridiculously white; it has the most profitable Talbots in America. That should tell you everything you need to know. It was also a true experience in heteronormativity. Not once did I feel any hostility for being queer, but people not getting it (and being deeply puzzled by me in menswear at the ball, but too polite to inquire) was pretty high. But an excellent event, and we'd totally go again.
The Buffy side of that equation is particularly difficult to talk about without looking like an asshole. I mean, I get it, and you want Buffy to be a hero, and Buffy (unlike Jack) has her own life available to put on the line. But seriously, I've kinda got to be with Giles here -- everyone can die a horrible death, including Dawn OR Dawn can die. Of course, there was option C, which still involved a sacrifice, and I'm relieved we got through the episode without it being "everybody lives!" because there's a lot of value I think in showing that both options A and B fail.
As usual, it's sort of the Angel side of the equation where I live. Which is to say, Wesley being put in charge, and being incredibly solemn and grave about it. The episode kept hammering on that idea that if you try to get no one killed, you'll get everyone killed. And, because the performances are so good, instead of rewarding the audience with a sense of pride for agreeing with the pragmatism of it, it some how leaves you going "I really, really don't want that job, EVER."
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
- no full suits, everything has to be mix and match
- a willingness to pay for dry cleaning as you go
- a slightly wrinkled-on-purpose gay antique dealers look
- quick-drying underwear
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
And I ♥ Wesley.
(Also glad that you had a great time - you both look lovely!)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I think I've seen travel kits that include a pillow/pillowcase and single-layer "sleeping bag" made from microfibre, so I don't think you're alone in reacting to whatever super-brute detergent they use to clean hotel bedlinen.
That's a lovely pic.
Good grief about the LJ shenanigans. I've been AFK, so I missed this latest outrage.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
She says she identifies as a lesbian for political reasons. Every time someone like her makes that decision, or someone like Joss Whedon has a character go from happily straight to exclusively lesbian with one relationship, it just continues the image of bisexuality as non-legitimate, and keeps bisexuals politically non-existent.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
No takers. Moreover, the National Review is clutching its pearls over the news that, as a New York City resident, she didn't learn to drive until in her late 20s, and apparently she's still not a good driver.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Then, of course, there's the whole part where Buffy has been rebelling against her life as a chosen slayer since she learned she was one - death was her only way out of it, and after never having much scholastic success in high school and having to sacrifice college - which she never ever dreamed possible for herself until she got there - I could see why she wouldn't look forward to a life of duty to everyone else but herself. However, despite these points, I definitely see yours as well. Dawn would not have been as terrible a loss because she wasn't the central figure in the story.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I travel a lot, mainly for work and an trick with most men's clothes (at least for business) is A) ever hotel has an iron and B) socks and underwear can be washed in the sink easily. If you're traveling from place to place a lot, spend the $$$ and get quick-try travel stuff.
But suit jackets? Nope. Get one good sport jacket, wear it on the plane, or decide to do checked luggage.
That said, that link is still pretty awesome and I bet I'll get a few tips I hadn't thought of reading it.
no subject
But if that doesn't work I fully expect them to pull out her inability to drive (WTF), her 'mannishness' (I've already seen that on-line), her Jewishness, her EastCoasterness (and NewYorkishness). Because everyone knows that these things are disqualifying attributes for a Supreme Court justice.
no subject
no subject
Yes indeed you both do. In this picture you also also have a sort of male anime character sort of look that I haven't seen with you before.
no subject
No Checked Bags: 14 Days in 1 Carry-On (http://www.academichic.com/2009/12/23/academichic-travels-14-days-1-bag/)
No Checked Bags: 10 Days, 4 Countries, 1 Carry-On (http://www.academichic.com/2010/04/06/european-travels/)
Granted, it's also harder for larger people as well, since our clothes take up more space!
no subject
No bets, because it's a sucker bet. But I am looking forward to Olberman and Stewart and especially Maddow. Ought to be a fun week for the punditry.
One anti-semitic word out of Limpballs, Blech, or any of their ilk and it may blow up in their faces. Maybe not. We can but hope.
no subject
no subject
I'm very much looking forward to seeing what you make of Season 6 -- there's some very interesting stuff in there.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)