Oddly, I found it semi-squicky when she wasn't on top. Hmm.
I know we don't know each other, but I find this really intriguing. Is it really rude and nosy of me to ask whether you mean "on top" in the literal sense? Because there were some shots where it was more of a figurative topping or bottoming -- in one, she was physically in her partner's lap (so "on top" of him), but clearly being held; in another she was on the bottom in the literal sense, but posed in such a way that it was meant to look like she was fucking him. Does it squick you when she's posed as if being penetrated, or when she's physically under him?
Unless this is the weirdest question in the world! This is one of those things which I feel waaaaay too comfortable discussing in public, so sometimes I'm not really sure where other people's boundaries lie. Please feel totally free to ignore me if I'm over the line.
Random thread-jumper is randomly jumping in
I know we don't know each other, but I find this really intriguing. Is it really rude and nosy of me to ask whether you mean "on top" in the literal sense? Because there were some shots where it was more of a figurative topping or bottoming -- in one, she was physically in her partner's lap (so "on top" of him), but clearly being held; in another she was on the bottom in the literal sense, but posed in such a way that it was meant to look like she was fucking him. Does it squick you when she's posed as if being penetrated, or when she's physically under him?
Unless this is the weirdest question in the world! This is one of those things which I feel waaaaay too comfortable discussing in public, so sometimes I'm not really sure where other people's boundaries lie. Please feel totally free to ignore me if I'm over the line.