ext_2910 ([identity profile] rm.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] rm 2010-10-20 04:04 pm (UTC)

You'd think!

But I've run into more than one conversation, both here and in private PMs/emails, where I'm realizing people don't watch or read the news beyond what I'm linking to, which creates a news-hunting and vetting obligation, I simply can't dedicate myself to in a primary way, both because of Hours in the Day and because I am a former investigative reporter, and there's a reason I'm not anymore.

That's because I worked at a wire service in a room broadcasting unexpurgated news feeds (which means the body parts at airplane crash sites and graphic execution footage from repressive regimes). The results of this is that I have a lot of dark humour and a deep, fundamental loyalty to journalists who do the hard, ugly stuff people hate them for. It is a perspective that is largely, rightly, unwelcome; but it is also a perspective I'm entitled to. And we're all better off if those things don't need to come into play here.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting