Manchurian Candidate
Jul. 30th, 2004 08:41 pmI've never seen such a deadly serious film also be so ironic, campy, bizarre and inappropriately erotic in my life. It is also the least subtle film in the history of the universe. I'm not sure I know what to do with it, at all. I will say I had shameless amounts of fun watching it, eventhough it hit a lot of my icky, bad, wanting to run out of the room buttons.
Meryl Streep is a goddess in this. For those who have read Cyteen she _is_ Ari Emory, just about a shade and a half crazier. I've never been so envious of a role in my life. Just... delicious. And despite what a lot of people are saying I don't think she's trying to evoke Hillary Clinton at all -- there's a level of delight in ths character, and energy, that is utterly un-Clinton.
Liev Schrieber has a role that is both thankless and a pain in the ass, and he does well with it, although it's so subtle that it might not hit you until you leave the theater.
Denzel Washington surprised me with what he was able to do in this.
I've also never seen so much really uncomfortable audience laughter ever. Mostly because of the two incidents described below.
Incident 1: Denzel Washington's character throwing Liev Schreiber's character face down on a conference table, ripping his shirt partially off and biting a chunk out of his shoulder.
Incident 2: Meryl Streep's character basically seducing her son (Liev Schreiber's character), while she's also giving him his final instructions (he's been brainwashed, long story). It's jump out of your skin disturbing, and audience members could not contain their incredulity as the scene goes from implication to absolutely pointed seduction. It's both more and less graphic than the corresponding scene in the original, but about 800 times more disturbing.
Oh my god. I do not know what to do with this puppy. Also... dude.... I think there are at least five sequences involving strangulation, all going on at great length.... like, I looked around that theater, and people were chewing their fingers and looking at each other for cues as to how to respond to any of it.
For those that are wondering, I don't think you can see me, but I also couldn't multitask enough to tell, which means you can't either. There's actually one thing where I think I might be there... but I'm background and the whole point is that you blink and you miss it.
Anyway, go see it.... good fun.
On another note, I saw the preview for Closer, which ends with Clive Owen saying "the reason you women don't understand the playing field is because you are the playing field." Which is the most succint summary of exactly what my war is. No thank you. I am neither territory, nor altar, and I am done being flattered, pandered to or used to prop anything else up. Fucking gorgeous line. But it's like that Harrison Ford "I love you" "I know" thing from Star Wars. Yeah, it's sexy... but fuck that shit. This probably deserves it's own post.
Also, Vanity Fair preview... again let me say OH MY GOD. You can watch it here: http://www.themoviebox.net/movies/2004/STUVWXYZ/Vanity-Fair/trailer-page.html I swear it will knock you sideways.
Finally, why are they making Blade III?
P.S. -- crappy ballroom dancing movie with Jennifer Lopez? No, bad idea.
Meryl Streep is a goddess in this. For those who have read Cyteen she _is_ Ari Emory, just about a shade and a half crazier. I've never been so envious of a role in my life. Just... delicious. And despite what a lot of people are saying I don't think she's trying to evoke Hillary Clinton at all -- there's a level of delight in ths character, and energy, that is utterly un-Clinton.
Liev Schrieber has a role that is both thankless and a pain in the ass, and he does well with it, although it's so subtle that it might not hit you until you leave the theater.
Denzel Washington surprised me with what he was able to do in this.
I've also never seen so much really uncomfortable audience laughter ever. Mostly because of the two incidents described below.
Incident 1: Denzel Washington's character throwing Liev Schreiber's character face down on a conference table, ripping his shirt partially off and biting a chunk out of his shoulder.
Incident 2: Meryl Streep's character basically seducing her son (Liev Schreiber's character), while she's also giving him his final instructions (he's been brainwashed, long story). It's jump out of your skin disturbing, and audience members could not contain their incredulity as the scene goes from implication to absolutely pointed seduction. It's both more and less graphic than the corresponding scene in the original, but about 800 times more disturbing.
Oh my god. I do not know what to do with this puppy. Also... dude.... I think there are at least five sequences involving strangulation, all going on at great length.... like, I looked around that theater, and people were chewing their fingers and looking at each other for cues as to how to respond to any of it.
For those that are wondering, I don't think you can see me, but I also couldn't multitask enough to tell, which means you can't either. There's actually one thing where I think I might be there... but I'm background and the whole point is that you blink and you miss it.
Anyway, go see it.... good fun.
On another note, I saw the preview for Closer, which ends with Clive Owen saying "the reason you women don't understand the playing field is because you are the playing field." Which is the most succint summary of exactly what my war is. No thank you. I am neither territory, nor altar, and I am done being flattered, pandered to or used to prop anything else up. Fucking gorgeous line. But it's like that Harrison Ford "I love you" "I know" thing from Star Wars. Yeah, it's sexy... but fuck that shit. This probably deserves it's own post.
Also, Vanity Fair preview... again let me say OH MY GOD. You can watch it here: http://www.themoviebox.net/movies/2004/STUVWXYZ/Vanity-Fair/trailer-page.html I swear it will knock you sideways.
Finally, why are they making Blade III?
P.S. -- crappy ballroom dancing movie with Jennifer Lopez? No, bad idea.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-30 06:04 pm (UTC)I can only assume that some poor slob foolishly signed a three-movie deal for Blade.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-31 05:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-31 06:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-31 10:09 am (UTC)tell me about it. I cannot remember the last time I have seen evidence of a less thought out re-make. Shall We Dance? was wonderful, but it has to exist in Japanese culture to make any sense. It's like they didn't even see the original.
I hate totally pointless re-makes almost as much as I hate watching Richard Gere attempting to dance.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-31 06:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-31 07:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-31 07:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-31 07:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-31 07:35 pm (UTC)I saw something odd and American when I was in Ireland, but I can't remember what.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-31 07:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-05 08:43 am (UTC)the problem i had with this movie was that although the performances were excellent, the film seemed to have not the emotional core that the original did. in the original, we see raymond fighting desperately to retain his humanity. i got very little sense of that in the remake.
the seduction scene is incredibly gross, no doubt. what chilled me about meryl streeps character is that she actually chose her son to be brainwashed like this. the levels of her depravity truly astounded me.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-05 10:04 am (UTC)