![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
argh!
(eventually, I might shut up about this film)
Dear Lazy Critics,
Alexander didn't have a bad opening because of its "frank depiction of bisexuality" nor because of the "obscurity of the title character."
1. Alexander the Great -- not obscure.
2. People aren't squicked by the bisexuality, they're squicked by the crying and whining of the lead character and the incoherence of the script. Also, even if they were were squicked by a bunch of meaningful looks and one pretty tepid kiss -- don't you think this was all forgotten in the wake of Rosario Dawson's breasts?
3. Shut up and go see Kinsey.
Thank you.
Dear Lazy Critics,
Alexander didn't have a bad opening because of its "frank depiction of bisexuality" nor because of the "obscurity of the title character."
1. Alexander the Great -- not obscure.
2. People aren't squicked by the bisexuality, they're squicked by the crying and whining of the lead character and the incoherence of the script. Also, even if they were were squicked by a bunch of meaningful looks and one pretty tepid kiss -- don't you think this was all forgotten in the wake of Rosario Dawson's breasts?
3. Shut up and go see Kinsey.
Thank you.