(no subject)

[rm]

I am infuriated.

Check out LJ's responses to my concerns about artistic freedom and hate speech definitions. Note how they don't answer my questions. Note how my rights will be "reviewed"

http://community.livejournal.com/lj_policy/876.html?thread=2156#t2156

Comments

[zarq.livejournal.com]

To be honest, if I were a big company, I'd say that if any drawing contains characters/people (fiction or non-fiction) in any form of situation that can look remotely sexual (dirty dancing, dry humping, groping chest/groin, reaching towards groin, finger/hand inching toward groin, etc) who look younger than 21 (because I think it's easier to determine a 21 y.o. than it is to determine an 18 y.o.) is considered child porn.

I'd be curious to see if such a policy would place a privately-held company on the winning or losing side of First Amendment lawsuits.