an extremely small footnote
Nov. 4th, 2008 03:10 pmhttp://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/04/waiting-for-obama-in-grant-park/
Regardless of the aptness of the analogy (which is certainly debatable), it never occurred to me until I read Mr. Krieglstein's comments that anyone anywhere thought we could ever possibly have gay president.
Regardless of the aptness of the analogy (which is certainly debatable), it never occurred to me until I read Mr. Krieglstein's comments that anyone anywhere thought we could ever possibly have gay president.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-04 08:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-04 08:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-04 08:39 pm (UTC)Greater Geek Power is on the rise, and will have dramatic effects in our lifetimes. Sexual life of candidates in the developed world is going to be as irrelevant as religious affiliation is right now in Canada.
President Takei, Prime Minister Rowling is online now. Did you want to conference call with Prime Minister[Canadian scientist you have totally never heard of]?
no subject
Date: 2008-11-04 08:41 pm (UTC)Whether Mr. Obama wins – and becomes the first African American president – or Senator John McCain wins, Ms. Strom said, the conversation will forever be different. “Something has changed by going through this whether you are black or not.”
She is right. No matter what, times are changing. I look at the kids like my daughter--SO damn proud to have voted, voted for Obama and thus feels a part of this important day despite being in a very red state--and have to feel hope. REAL hope.
I would love to see in my lifetime (I am in my 40's) an election where race, sex, sexual orientation doesn't matter... Maybe? But surely in my daughter's. This can't be reversed, though I feel a measure of fear of those who will try.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-04 08:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-05 12:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-04 08:48 pm (UTC)I read an article the other day about a 110 year old black voter (whose grandfather or father, I forget which, was a former slave) never thought she'd see a black presidential candidate, let alone a viable one. So I'm pretty sure this will change too.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-04 09:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-04 10:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-04 11:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-04 09:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-04 09:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-04 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-04 11:02 pm (UTC)But if you look at history, the sequence is black men, women (generally white then black), then some combination of disabled, gay, minorities, etc, following that. So I think it's likely we'll have a woman for a president before we have an openly gay person in that office.
In fact, I think the very last one "in line" will be an atheist :-P.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-04 11:32 pm (UTC)The Republicans have fielded a female VP candidate. It wasn't seen as particularly brave. It was dismissed as cynical pandering to the Hillary Clinton constituency. That's right, they picked up a woman to woo a demographic.
Equal rights for women has slipped into that hazy "oh, is there still a problem with that?" zone, where yes, there obviously is still a problem, but it's below the level where people can talk about it as directly without sounding crazy.
Prop 8 demonstrations are pretty clear evidence that the gay equality issue is still somewhere around "Votes for Women" with all the collapse of society arguments included. But the news cycles are getting shorter, and the changes are getting faster.
I'm pretty confident that we'll get there.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-05 02:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 01:41 am (UTC)I guess I was too slow...