and in gay news
Nov. 19th, 2008 11:00 pmEHarmony settled with the NJ AG and is creating a service for GBLT folk.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/LIVING/11/19/eharmony.same.sex.matches/index.html
Meanwhile, everything gets a ribbon.
http://whiteknot.org/
http://www.cnn.com/2008/LIVING/11/19/eharmony.same.sex.matches/index.html
Meanwhile, everything gets a ribbon.
http://whiteknot.org/
no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 04:25 am (UTC)The sad news I guess is that Chemistry will have to change their tagline.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 04:28 am (UTC)Of course, everyone I know has been rejected by eHarmony as too difficult to match. Theories range from being too slutty to too Jewish.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 04:33 am (UTC)Actually, that sounds pretty good. Dear eHarmony: hurry it the fuck up already.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 04:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 04:40 am (UTC)Let's just say those were some of the best lateral pull-downs ever.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 04:47 am (UTC)God, where was I? Somewhere or other recently, I was being all big and loud and Jackish and there was some guy across the room who I couldn't stop staring at because he was dressed well and had the nose, and when I finally figured out what was going on there, I just laughed and laughed and laughed.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 04:51 am (UTC)It's a lot like exercising in a men's bathroom, except that phrase isn't a euphemism for anything.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 05:27 am (UTC)2. I wish women would learn from male bathroom etiquette, because Kali and I were at a bar last night and strange drunk girls kept talking to me in the bathroom, and I was like "wow, I don't like people, and we're in here to piss, and I don't know where your hand has been...." It was one big homosocial WTF.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 04:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 04:42 am (UTC)*snerk*
no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 05:07 am (UTC)I'm sure that's what eHarmony is counting on. If their service goes live and due to lack of support, poor branding, or a general boycott they can probably go to the attorney general's office and ask to shut it down as its failing to make a profit for them.
Of course now I'm curious to see if I would get rejected by eHarmony or not.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 04:53 am (UTC)Why was there a discrimination suit against eHarmony in the first place? I know that it's a "find your mainstream white heterosexual christian soulmate" website. It pretty much says so right on the box. There are plenty of other dating websites out there, though. Why pound on the door of this one in particular?
no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 05:06 am (UTC)one more news item from a gay boycott
Date: 2008-11-20 05:07 am (UTC)Re: one more news item from a gay boycott
Date: 2008-11-20 05:23 am (UTC)Btw? Fuck? It's a word. You can say it.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 11:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 01:48 pm (UTC)Really.
That's what they're calling it?
no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 03:25 pm (UTC)Still, baby steps, baby steps...
no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 04:42 pm (UTC)*wavy imagination lines*
Inside eHarmony headquarters:
Suit#1(slams down phone):"That was our soon-to-be former legal team. They lost the case. We have to make a gay networking site! Can you believe it? What the hell are we going to call this thing?"
Suit#2:"No clue. Who'll be our main competition? Intern!"
Intern: "Um...(fumbles with papers)that would be... Chemistry.com, Sir."
Suit#2: "Those queers sure do like their science, don't they?"
Suit#1: "It's all a part of that agenda of theirs. They take the word of God out of the equation and replace it with a bunch of scientific mamby-pamby."
Suit#2: "Horrible-- what's this world coming to?" (shakes head sadly) "Now-- chemistry! What do I remember about chemistry?" (puts on thinking face, strokes goatee) "How about... Covalent Bonds?"
Suit#1: "It's good, but it's a bit too obvious. It has to sound original. We just settled one lawsuit. I don't need some MySpace vs. Facebook sort of fuck-up to deal with before we can hire a better legal team."
Suit#2(nods head in agreement): "Intern! What do you think?"
Intern(fumbles): Um... uh... what do I think? Well... how about um...(shrugs) Compatible Partners?"
Suit#2: "Perfect! [Suit#1], what do you think?"
Suit#1: "It sounds good to me. Well, I'm glad that that's settled! We can send out the press release, and it's not even lunchtime!"
no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 05:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 05:29 pm (UTC)*puts on genius cap*
no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 05:14 pm (UTC)If you wouldn't mind being MQ'ed, I'd join
no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 05:31 pm (UTC)Looks like an interesting group.
I might just join it myself.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 03:00 pm (UTC)