Date: 2009-02-04 11:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lefaym.livejournal.com
LOL SKIENCE.

Reminding women that we are wrong, whatever we look like.

Date: 2009-02-04 11:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xtricks.livejournal.com
The thing that bugs me is ... I followed a link about cheating and some of the studies put people having sexual relationships outside their primary one reached 76% and only as low as 41% (setting aside the fact I'm not sure the studies were well done) and doesn't a 76% rate of sleeping iwth more than one partner suggest not a 76% devation from some norm but that perhaps having only one sex partner at a time *is* the devation from the norm?

They had to try ane explain it by some semi-bogus psychological disorder.

Date: 2009-02-05 12:12 am (UTC)
thornsilver: (2009)
From: [personal profile] thornsilver
Punishment for unsubstantiated pseudo-scientific crap, should be stocks. Then I can throw rotten vegetables at them. (What? I can dream!)

Date: 2009-02-05 01:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] holyschist.livejournal.com
Actually, the problem to me looks more like bad stats--the science journalist is justifiably critical of the study (well, I suppose the other articles linked to are not so critical...but I think the Discover blogger should get props for not being stupid).

Date: 2009-02-05 01:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] heron61.livejournal.com
The statistic that I'd really be interested in seeing is the ratio of studies on sexuality &/or gender that were remotely well done to the ratio that were statistically ludicrous pieces of crap done to attempt to support someone's idea of inherent social norms. I fear that fraction would look something like 1/20.

Date: 2009-02-05 01:31 am (UTC)

Date: 2009-02-05 01:39 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] jo02
It was too difficult to *headdesk* and keep reading, so I stopped reading.
It seemed the less painful thing to do.
As [livejournal.com profile] lefaym said, "skience" ...
Skigh.
Edited Date: 2009-02-05 01:40 am (UTC)

Date: 2009-02-05 05:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hexkitten.livejournal.com
Oh, bother.

She gave an interview for InStyle wherein she succinctly mentioned that Quaid was cheating on her and the marriage was already over when she started seeing Russell Crowe. She also mentioned that she didn't think to go into this detail with the media because, hey, she and Quaid have a kid together and she didn't want to drag his dad through the mud.

What a bunch of misogynistic garbage.

Date: 2009-02-05 06:04 am (UTC)
arcanetrivia: a light purple swirl on a darker purple background (Default)
From: [personal profile] arcanetrivia
Well I always knew my squarish jaw was a problem, but I didn't think it was this problem...

Date: 2009-02-05 02:04 pm (UTC)
sethg: a petunia flower (Default)
From: [personal profile] sethg
There are so many reasons why a person might cheat (or why they might resist the temptation to cheat) that I'm not sure how to define "norm". Categorizing the behavior simply along the axis of "cheat/don't cheat" seems like it would be missing so much relevant detail as to be useless.

February 2021

S M T W T F S
 123456
789 10111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 18th, 2026 02:07 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios