Page Summary
lakme.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lawnrrd - (no subject)
feyandstrange.livejournal.com - (no subject)
rm.livejournal.com - (no subject)
rm.livejournal.com - (no subject)
rani23.livejournal.com - (no subject)
feyandstrange.livejournal.com - (no subject)
rm.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lawnrrd - (no subject)
rm.livejournal.com - (no subject)
orobouros.livejournal.com - (no subject)
tsarina.livejournal.com - (no subject)
rm.livejournal.com - (no subject)
tsarina.livejournal.com - (no subject)
rm.livejournal.com - (no subject)
roy-batty.livejournal.com - (no subject)
rm.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2004-02-24 06:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-24 07:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-24 07:35 pm (UTC)My years as a bisexual activist taught me that the HRC are the Republican right-wing assimilationists of the lot, despite their size. They occasionally remember to add "bisexual and transgender" to their documents, but almost never to their policies. They favor assimilationism and "we're just like you - we're white church-going Republicans who ski and drive Volvos, it's just that our daughter is a lesbian" (and that's almost a direct quote from an ad campaign a few years ago) philosophy. They refused to work with us at Anything That Moves - at the time we were one of the largest bisexual nonprofits and the only national/international published voice of bisexuality - because our name sounded too much like sex. Sex isn't something the HRC wants to admit that gay people have, you see; it scares Republicans.
Also, the HRC is still dealing with the financial aftermath of the March on Washington and may still be under investigation by the Feds for having lost a lot of the money they brought in.
The HRC has admitted that it supports the scientifically inaccurate "we were born this way, we can't help being gay" stance (which coincedentally leaves bi and trans folks and people who choose way out in the cold) because surveys show more Middle American voters feel "sorry" for gays and lesbians if it's something you were born with, like a birth defect. I can understand a conservative political strategy in some cases, but they've got the nerve to ask bi and trans organisations for money to support this stuff which patently won't help us. (Also, I believe in choice, and I don't want middle America's pity for liking girls as well as guys.)
So I'm more inclined to support Lambda, who've been much better about supporting bi/trans/freaky queer folks instead of just the ones who are socially acceptable these days, and whose finances I'm more inclined to trust.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-24 07:39 pm (UTC)I love Lamdba legal to death, I just feel like in addition to the legal bills, I want to get behind educating people about the entire situation -- from "gays are not scary" to "this is what ammending the constitution means to our national identity" -- which isn't really LL's department.
Maybe split the fungs between them and GLAAD?
no subject
Date: 2004-02-24 07:41 pm (UTC)(sorry, but man, sometimes, you just gotta take those once in a lifetime opportunities to utter sentences that weird).
Seriously though, you rock, and at the moment, I am thinking right at the beginning of April, of course, as my roommate hasn't even heard about this yet, there are logistics to consider.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-24 07:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-24 08:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-24 08:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-24 08:26 pm (UTC)And everyone, male or female, gay or straight or bi or trans, young or old, carnivorous or omnivorous, loves corn dogs. If anyone needs cover, we can call it kitsch. Is kitsch still in?
no subject
Date: 2004-02-24 08:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-24 09:44 pm (UTC)As for the legal group thing, I don't know enough about either, so whoever you deem appropriate would be fine by me. I trust your judgment.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-24 09:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-24 10:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-24 10:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-24 10:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-25 08:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-25 08:51 am (UTC)