[ETA: Okay, before anyone else rants at me about dueling -- yes, I know that was a shitty solution too, as traditions of honor were largely used as ways to provoke fights and skill at violence often won out over who was actually correct. Please remember that I'm a student of classical and historical fencing, and that sometimes I'm slightly wry about it. Historically speaking, if one calls "you're a liar" it had to be dealt with, as, at minimum, someone trying to start a fight -- this is my point. Today it's just dealt with as a somehow reasonable part of the political discourse.]
[ETA2: I am not misquoting Heinlein. I am repeating a remark that has often been the subject of discussion in my fencing salle.]
no subject
Date: 2009-09-10 02:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-10 02:39 pm (UTC)Heinlein didn't know what he was talking about. I, too, used to romanticize dueling; then I read the excellent, highly recommended Gentlemen's Blood: A History of Dueling by Barbara Holland.
When dueling wasn't simply personal, it was a way for thugs and bullies to enforce their wills. It's a medieval remnant to believe that the person in the right is also the person who is better at shooting/fencing whatever. (Although clearly in your case this would be true. *g*) Duelists weren't polite; they were simply better at killing people, nor were the societies they lived in notably polite. (See: late-1800s France, where both the yellow press and dueling were endemic.)
At least two great men, the mathematician Évariste Galois and the poet Alexander Pushkin, died young in duels over love affairs; although society was impoverished by the gentlemen's loss, the manners of the public changed not a whit. (At least one of the ladies involved went on her merry way.)
Sorry to sidetrack with a rant; that book updated my head big-time.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-10 02:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-10 02:43 pm (UTC)Dueling has nothing to do with it. If you are willing to backup your beliefs with your life, your beliefs become much more tangible.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-10 02:44 pm (UTC)I was not detailed, because I'm not detailed before noon. And if Heinlein ever said "a dueling society is a polite society" I didn't know that and I try not to get any of my world view from him as a rule. That came from my fencing master in this case.
Yay book rec though.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-10 02:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-10 02:47 pm (UTC)What he actually said is "an armed society is a polite society", but he was referring to dueling in practice.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-10 02:48 pm (UTC)To be frank, I bristled less at what you had to say than at the possibility anyone could think I get any of my worldview from Heinlein, who is an author I tend not to be generous about, despite having enjoyed some aspects of some of his books.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-10 02:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-10 02:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-10 02:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-10 03:03 pm (UTC)I'm glad that Barney Frank was stern and called it like he saw it and I want more to do the same. To say, "Stop. This is unacceptable behaviour."
I just hope it works and quickly, I' really am tired of the batshit crazy that's invaded the news and rational discourse.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-10 03:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-10 03:07 pm (UTC)Letter to late Heinlein
Date: 2009-09-10 03:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-10 03:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-10 03:30 pm (UTC)... I still like it though, as well as Stranger in a Strange Lang, if only because I can now grok things more easily.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-10 03:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-10 03:34 pm (UTC)And dismemberment. There's nothing more entertaining than dismemberment when it happens in such an arbitrary and utterly brainless manner.
Also the FX rock, all the phallic and yonic imagery are too good.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-10 04:20 pm (UTC)And once I'd taken the fascistic society of ST as read, it was a reasonably enjoyable book (though I'm told that there are various revised editions available - earlier ones are better because they predate Late Heinlein's rewrites).
For war-related SF of that general period, I still prefer "The Forever War".
no subject
Date: 2009-09-10 04:20 pm (UTC)(Seriously, though? Appalled is not a strong enough word. It's like half our elected officials have forgotten how to conduct themselves in that context. ARGH.)
Eek on the stabbing. Amused by the scheduling conflict.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-10 04:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-10 05:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-10 05:47 pm (UTC)This, in so many ways. I suppose the ultimate rebellion nowadays is to learn one's manners and use them... *sigh*
no subject
Date: 2009-09-10 05:51 pm (UTC)it has its flaws but like a social disease I feel the need to spread it :)