all these heroes fall
Sep. 29th, 2009 02:06 pmRoman Polanski raped a girl and pled guilty to it (and let me add to this: RAPE. It involved force and drugs _and_ the girl was 13, and I don't care what she or her life was like, she doesn't deserved to get raped -- no one does).
The fact of this rape has nothing to do with the fact that Polanski is also a significant artist.
Polanski did not commit rape because he is an artist. He did not commit art because he raped. That art and rape can be present in one person, should not, but does, surprise us.
Because the person he raped wants the matter to be dropped, I am torn on what I think should happen next. But that is the only reason.
There is, if you have not yet heard a petition going around that has been signed by luminaries of the film world protesting Polanski's arrest in this case, with some specificity being made about the arrest transpiring at a film festival.
The list of signatories is breaking my heart. It includes not just people whose work I admire, but people whose existence and/or work I feel has made my existence safer (yes, I'm looking at you, Tilda Swinton). Perhaps more distressingly, it includes people I have also worked with, not just in the sense of yes, we got a check from the same production company and might have exchanged a smile, but in the sense of people who have given me direction, touched me in the act of scene composition and deemed me worthy not just of praise, but of work; in celluloid they decreed my existence.
How dare you all!
A child got raped, and while there are reasons to perhaps discuss what should happen to Polanski next and why, Polanski isn't less of a rapist because he makes important films. And he's not less of an important filmmaker because he raped.
But that's not even what's important.
What's important is that a horrible crime is not less significant because a bunch of people sign a piece of paper because they're upset something ugly happened amongst all their pretty. That those people are the people who inadvertently, or in a few cases by looking into my eyes and telling me how to feel, taught me that pretty isn't all that counts, has me utterly shaking, mostly, but not entirely, with rage.
I am not articulate about this. This is not how I wanted to see all my heroes fall. And I'm just sitting here watching the list grow and praying, praying, praying that no more names with personal meaning to me show up on it.
But more than that, I pray that we somehow manage to do right both by our judicial system and the person who was raped.
Believe it or not, this has nothing to do with art, and I don't get why people can't see that.
The fact of this rape has nothing to do with the fact that Polanski is also a significant artist.
Polanski did not commit rape because he is an artist. He did not commit art because he raped. That art and rape can be present in one person, should not, but does, surprise us.
Because the person he raped wants the matter to be dropped, I am torn on what I think should happen next. But that is the only reason.
There is, if you have not yet heard a petition going around that has been signed by luminaries of the film world protesting Polanski's arrest in this case, with some specificity being made about the arrest transpiring at a film festival.
The list of signatories is breaking my heart. It includes not just people whose work I admire, but people whose existence and/or work I feel has made my existence safer (yes, I'm looking at you, Tilda Swinton). Perhaps more distressingly, it includes people I have also worked with, not just in the sense of yes, we got a check from the same production company and might have exchanged a smile, but in the sense of people who have given me direction, touched me in the act of scene composition and deemed me worthy not just of praise, but of work; in celluloid they decreed my existence.
How dare you all!
A child got raped, and while there are reasons to perhaps discuss what should happen to Polanski next and why, Polanski isn't less of a rapist because he makes important films. And he's not less of an important filmmaker because he raped.
But that's not even what's important.
What's important is that a horrible crime is not less significant because a bunch of people sign a piece of paper because they're upset something ugly happened amongst all their pretty. That those people are the people who inadvertently, or in a few cases by looking into my eyes and telling me how to feel, taught me that pretty isn't all that counts, has me utterly shaking, mostly, but not entirely, with rage.
I am not articulate about this. This is not how I wanted to see all my heroes fall. And I'm just sitting here watching the list grow and praying, praying, praying that no more names with personal meaning to me show up on it.
But more than that, I pray that we somehow manage to do right both by our judicial system and the person who was raped.
Believe it or not, this has nothing to do with art, and I don't get why people can't see that.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 08:26 pm (UTC)This. Absolutely this.
ETA because I haven't said anything about this anywhere and my mind explodes.
I have a coworker who is worried about her cousin, because he is about to be released from prison as a sex offender. He has nowhere to live. She is afraid no one will hire him. He has to register wherever he goes and will forever (he is a young man) be labeled as such. Oh, btw, he is also African American and from a low-income background.
Polanski has all the privilege in the world to create and travel and eat fine food and love beautiful people.
I wouldn't have such a problem letting the Polanski thing go, were it not for the way so many others are treated in the name of justice. Neither extreme is right.
So much lately I feel like I am screaming into a strong wind. Inside my head, anyway.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 08:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 09:02 pm (UTC)I think you were linked to this some where else along the thread, but it has grown large, but this post (http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/09/28/puzzle-activity-time/) at Feministe is really superb. That is what rape culture looks like.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 11:06 pm (UTC)But, she’s grown-up now, can’t we just drop it? She wasn’t then. And if she were, it would still be rape.
See, I like that they make this point. I've heard commentary like: "Well, he thought she was of age."
Okay, because getting someone intoxicated and performing sexual assault upon their person is fine if they're OVER 16. WTF?
no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 09:21 pm (UTC)Gods, its disappointing - and disgusting.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 09:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 09:31 pm (UTC)Wes Anderson and Pedro Aldomovar, though, they surprise me.
One would hope that with Jonatham Demme understood these things better after Silence of the Lambs, but apparently not.
Most of the people are ones I don't care about their work. And, as a rape victim, they apparently don't care about me, either.
Gah, and Soderbergh. He's one of my favorites.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 09:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 10:14 pm (UTC)Or Charlie Kaufman.
Or David Mamet.
On the other hand, looking at some of the names on the updated list. Kundera? Sigh. Rushdie I can understand, in a way, because of how he had to live in seclusion.
Totally get why Mendes would be weird for you -- I can't imagine being in that position.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 09:40 pm (UTC)There is no way he should be let off for this. Even if the woman who was the victim says so. Because he commited a crime and has to pay for it.
no subject
And is as evident from the, it is heartbreakingly apparent that one can also be an artist and a damned fool.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 11:26 pm (UTC)God. I just want to go and flang myself off a high place.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 11:52 pm (UTC)True, this took years. Far too many years, but now it has happened and he gets to face the music. And the simple fact of "he raped a 13 year old girl" is about all that needs to be said. Is this any different than Israel/Simon Wiesenthal STILL chasing down Nazi war criminals? It is far too easy to think enough time has gone by leave the poor guys alone, but when it is simply presented as what they did...I don't think there is any room for argument.
I have not yet followed your link but I will, and like you I expect I will be apalled with some of the names (if not all) that show up. I don't mind telling you I don't want to read that list...but it disgusts me to think someone could try and defend the action taken with Polansky on any grounds.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 11:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 01:30 am (UTC)My brain hurts.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 01:50 am (UTC)http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2009/sep/29/roman-polanski-whoopi-goldberg
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 01:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 02:00 am (UTC)I feel sort of like the world has gone completely insane.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 01:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 02:08 am (UTC)Yours is the first response to this whole thorny problem that feels right to me, that puts forth a thing I was trying to articulate in my own mind.
I think it is a typically American flaw, to want conversations with our artists. And if they cannot be our friends, we say, we don't want them for artists either; so if we want them for artists, they must be friends.
I cannot speak to the dead, but their art is still sacred to me. The same holds true for certain people whose philosophies, or actions, I cannot respect or condone. I wish more people recognized this distinction.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 05:57 am (UTC)I do not have to tell you how many and how heinous the crimes are that have been covered up for that same reason, and I don't think I have to explain here why I think it's bad morality as well as bad logic.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 11:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 12:05 pm (UTC)That, and what some others were saying about how people's signing the petition signifies a total lack of recognition of worth of that 13-year-old girl. Her life and sanity are effectively rendered worthless BECAUSE they believe that Polanski's art excuses him from justice.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 04:02 pm (UTC)Because it's the only way I can get a coherent discussion of this in my LJ. Otherwise I'm just "GRR ARRGH DEATHRAGESMASHY."
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 04:02 pm (UTC)