On the other hand, is the show's worldview amoral, immoral or just totally absent and the product of incoherent writing. It's like, with Torchwood one can usually tell what went wrong wit the script or the direction or the acting or whatever and what's supposed to be dark and horrible. With Merlin Patty and I just keep shouting at the TV, "what the hell was that?"
On the other hand, is the show's worldview amoral, immoral or just totally absent and the product of incoherent writing. It's like, with Torchwood one can usually tell what went wrong wit the script or the direction or the acting or whatever and what's supposed to be dark and horrible. With Merlin Patty and I just keep shouting at the TV, "what the hell was that?"
no subject
Date: 2009-10-22 02:07 pm (UTC)Merlin obviously exists for the slash and the other UST, whether the writers know it or not. All you have to do is watch a few minutes and you know Merlin and Arthur are So Doing It.
Anything which is wrong with an episode... yeah, it's the writing.
Oops, missed this part
Date: 2009-10-22 02:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-22 02:08 pm (UTC)Try to plan some museum time as that is absolutely the best time to go because only the locals are out!
Hopefully we'll be able to get together for food or something!
Re: Oops, missed this part
Date: 2009-10-22 02:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-22 02:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-22 02:11 pm (UTC)And yeah. Dude. It's so OT4. But like, super, super incompetently so.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-22 02:14 pm (UTC)March is actually one of my favorite times in DC.
One of my bellydancing friends restores manuscripts at LoC!
Should I research gluten-free places?
no subject
Date: 2009-10-22 02:16 pm (UTC)It's like Sentinel: Stupid show, *perfect* for fanfic.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-22 02:16 pm (UTC)But I know nothing about gluten-free in DC, so that is definitely helpful. Being a New Yorker, I try to be ashamed of my gratitude for chain restaurants with good GF menus, but do you guys PF Changs or Legal Seafoods yet?
Re: Oops, missed this part
Date: 2009-10-22 02:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-22 02:17 pm (UTC)Also, the fight scenes are not terrible (the bad jousting aside, the sword stuff is pretty good).
no subject
Date: 2009-10-22 02:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-22 02:28 pm (UTC)PF Changs aren't as easy to get to; there's one at White Flint Mall in Rockville (it's about a mile from the Metro) and one in Arlington but I'm not certain if it's close to the Metro.
I'll look at other options.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-22 02:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-22 02:29 pm (UTC)And hi! It's a pleasure to make your acquaintance :D
no subject
Date: 2009-10-22 02:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-22 02:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-22 02:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-22 03:04 pm (UTC)Hell, I'm one of them. There are many circumstances under which I'd only love to do one of those pundit columns, but I didn't bother with this. Why not? Well:
1. Four hundred words, dude. Their regular columnists aren't working in any 400 words. There are circumstances in which you can say something worth saying, in ways that are worth listening to, in 400 words, but a context-free sample column is not one in which I can do it. (I'm at close to 150 already with this comment. Can you imagine, if I'd had to do an intro for a piece on something that hasn't been opined on to death?)(ETA: This comment wound up at almost exactly 400 words. Which rather illustrates my point, I fear.)
2. The *Post*, for God's sake. Where they still evidently believe that Richard Cohen makes valuable additions to our nation's discourse, and that George Will's climate change denial columns don't merit corrections. It's brave of you to be willing to do any contest Fred Hiatt's crew will have a hand in judging, I think: if they like your work, it might actually be creepier than if they decide some moron is a better choice.
And those are just my reasons. Others will never have heard of the contest, or feel that the Post won't publish them because of its famed Liberal Bias (I know, ha ha), or be perfectly comfortable with their blog audience (it got Greenwald and Ezra Klein to the majors, without their having to compromise to do it). Or they'll never have worked in publishing, and therefore not have any idea that the fact that they can write at all gives them a good shot at being better than 95% of the imagined competition. Et cetera, et cetera.
I hope the judges have the sense to jump on you with cries of joy, and thereby to prove at least some of my own cynicism about this whole thing to have been misplaced. But if they don't, I confess that I will not be exactly astonished.
Because it's the Post. You know?
no subject
Date: 2009-10-22 03:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-22 03:08 pm (UTC)You know what's scary? My column for the entry? First draft -- 404 words, not counting until the end. My ability to hit markers like that is somewhat frightening.
And yeah, the Washington Post is such an odd duck. As I said to Patty last night "more conservative than the New York Times, but on the other hand, doesn't torture us with endless articles about the tragic plight of rich white moms and their agonizing attempts to be perfect."
Anyway, my entry column was about equal marriage, status and kitchen gadgets.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-22 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-22 03:28 pm (UTC)Also, DEPARTMENT OF NO is going on my list of catch phrases to annoy with. Love it.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-22 03:29 pm (UTC)Re: tiny kittens
Date: 2009-10-22 03:34 pm (UTC)