[personal profile] rm
  • This morning I listened to two young men at my subway station have the following discussion:

    #1: So yeah, there was this guy, like, like, like Brad Pitt, and he had hair like her [pointing at me], and he was wearing this really tight pink dress shirt, like a woman's shirt and short short, like woman's shorts.
    #2: Brad Pitt!
    #1: Fucking faggot.
    #2: Yeah, yeah. What did you do?
    #1: It was ugly, man, fucking faggot!

    Gender-normative privilege means never having to be viscerally relieved you look like you conform at a given moment.

  • Do we really want a .gay Internet suffix? The article doesn't address it, but I wonder. On one hand, super convenient when I'm planning travel in a world that's still not always friendly. On another, the Internet is great because there's no gay ghetto. The gay is here and people just have to deal with it. If there's a .gay all sorts of harmful filtering gets a lot easier. I don't know. I'm troubled.

  • [livejournal.com profile] kproche! It turns out I have a friend in the accessories industry. You might get your cut-rate tacky mermen Christmas tree ornaments after all. She's going to look at the next trade show, and if she succeeds I'll bring them to Gally.

  • Meanwhile, I enjoy being a girl! I get my own hotel room for the Zurich trip. The men I work with are all in a suite together.

  • I am deeply troubled by this review of Mira Nair's Amelia, which contains the line "The director Mira Nair, whose only qualification appears to be that she’s a woman who has made others films about and with women (“Mississippi Masala,” “Vanity Fair”), keeps a tidy screen — it’s all very neat and carefully scrubbed. I don’t recall a single dented automobile or a fissure of real feeling etched into a face.".

    Why?

    I don't recall reading a movie review in which a male director's credentials are questioned in this manner. No one would expect a male director of a biopic to be a pilot or a fighter or a sea captain or whatever the subject of the film was about. Nair, whose films tend to be interesting failures, has taken on a pretty broad array of subjects in her films, and there's always this undertone in reviews of her work that's "why is the Indian woman making movies about things that aren't Indian?" which, you know, also makes me want to punch people in the face. Additionally, even assuming directors are required to stick to subjects of personal relevance to them (something that only seems to be asked of PoC and female directors), anyone who doesn't get why an Indian woman has a great deal to say about the lot of a woman in the Regency-era (Nair directed Vanity Fair a couple of years back), doesn't know the period. Or India.

    Also, "she keeps a tidy screen"? Really? Nice to know Nair can handle cinematic housework. Or something. When we review men, this comment is usually "the film is workman-like" and that would have been an appropriate way to level the criticism that seems to be being made. Alas, no. Girls are tidy!

    Additionally, a fascination with a sanitized and gleaming past should hardly be laid at Nair's doorstep in general or because she's a woman. It's a film-affliction in general, and one that I might argue is a valid creative choice in a film presumably meant to feel like it's about the future even as it's about the past.

    The whole review is riddled with sexism both about Nair and Earhart (who is, historically, actually considered to be a mediocre pilot, although I don't know enough about the reality of planes of that period or flying them to say whether this assessment is fair -- luck was such a large part of the game back then), including the Times's assertion that the letter Earhart wrote to her husband before their wedding was remarkable. It read: "I shall not hold you to any medieval code of faithfulness to me nor shall I consider myself bound to you similarly. Please let us not interfere with the other’s work or play." OMG! A woman wanting something other than "traditional" fidelity! How can it be?!

    The whole review is appalling.

  • Then there's For every 100 women enrolled in college, only 77 men are, in which the gender gap in higher-education is discussed and no one asks why if women are better educated why we're still paid less or considers the possibility that we all go to college because we need more credentials to have even an uneven chance of success. Additionally, I really think we need to stop expecting so little of men in so many ways. Yuck.

  • As an aside, I do wish Lars von Trier would go away.

  • Shouting is the new spanking, but mostly I'm linking to this piece for the single phrase "pregnancy-flaunting." I've mentioned in the past that even in my childhood (30 years ago), visible signs of pregnancy were hidden and not discussed in the world that I lived in, because even the acknowledgment that married people fucked and the results thereof was not okay. However, as a throwaway phrase without explanation, "pregnancy-flaunting" is pretty wacky and unclear, even if I am sick of the whole "people with kids are better than people without kids" thing you get in certain segments of New York society. Anyway, pregnancy flaunting?!?!?! Mostly though, it's just another New York Times article on first world neuroses.

  • How many types of scary is this? First, sounds like the pilots fell asleep, which is the stuff of nightmare enough. But then, they had the flight make unnecessary maneuvers so that folks on the ground could be sure the plane hadn't been hijacked and there were fighter jets standing by.

  • Soupy Sales died. I doubt anyone younger than me even knows what I'm talking about.

  • Last night I dreamed we were in London and I got drafted to play a grave digger at the Globe, but then the script was formatted strangely, and I couldn't figure it out.

  • That cats, which exist to emit hair, poo and love, dragged a bag of cookies out of Patty's book bag, riped the plastic bag opened, ate some and left a big mess for me to clean up this morning.

  • The tiny mew mew we saw on the stairs yesterday seems to have gone back to wherever is home. There was no sign of it last night. I hope the little guy is okay.

  • [livejournal.com profile] rollick gives us a HILARIOUS (and illustrated in a way that might be marginally NSFW) post about sexy Halloween costumes and dogs and why the two really, really don't make for sexy matching adorable holiday fun.

  • Alarming family conversations, part 1 - My mom: "How big are Patty's hands?"

  • Alarming family conversations, part 2 - Patty's mom: "What size underwear does Racheline wear?"

    (It is worth noting that her mother gave me pajamas for Christmas last year that three different people have remarked, apropos of thing, "OMG, did Jack steal those from the Doctor or what?")

  • I have acquired my flights to Gallifrey One. February 25th, 8pm, LA Airport Marriott bar, pink drinks and gossip. If you're not there, we're talking about you.

  • Tonight we are seeing Songs of Ascension at BAM.

  • This song makes me cry. Every. Single. Time.
  • Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>

    Date: 2009-10-23 03:46 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] firinel.livejournal.com
    I wondered if you saw, and if so what your take was on, the news report about the "beautiful younger cheerleader who was heart-brokenly stricken with a terrible affliction because of the flu vaccine". http://bit.ly/i5hzY

    The report smacked so much of "it's a shame because she was beautiful and thus had potential (we really wouldn't have cared if she was fat and/or ugly)" to me.

    Date: 2009-10-23 03:53 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] rm.livejournal.com
    Ugh. I hate "Pretty girls are good girls." Hadn't seen this. Will check it out.

    just wondering

    Date: 2009-10-23 03:58 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] 1-mad-squirrel.livejournal.com
    The "ch" in your name, is it hard like "church" or soft like "champagne"?

    Re: just wondering

    Date: 2009-10-23 03:59 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] rm.livejournal.com
    Like champagne.

    Date: 2009-10-23 03:59 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] kathrynrose.livejournal.com
    Soupy Sales died. I doubt anyone younger than me even knows what I'm talking about.

    I am older than you, and I doubted that anyone younger than me would remember.

    Date: 2009-10-23 04:12 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] eumelia.livejournal.com
    Those kind of conversations, which I hear far too often, scare the shit out of me. I've reached that point in my looks in which I'm invisible - and sometimes that's okay.

    Sexist, racist, Western/American-centric and other stuff that get shat onto people who aren't "the default". Gross!

    The script may have looked odd because dream state (in almost all people) happens in portions of the brain in which reading comprehension doesn't exist.

    Date: 2009-10-23 04:13 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] rm.livejournal.com
    What's funny, is that I can remember the script exactly, but there were lines that had to be delivered over other lines others were speaking and it was notated more like a music score and int he dream I couldn't figure it out.

    Date: 2009-10-23 04:15 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] eumelia.livejournal.com
    Same thing when you think about it, exchanging symbols and stuff. You know you're supposed to understand what's written, but it's just outside your grasp.

    Date: 2009-10-23 04:21 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] darthhellokitty.livejournal.com
    Wow - you can tell I live in a fantasy world, I was thinking that subway encounter was going to end up as a compliment.

    Quite a movie review... complaining about Hilary Swank having great teeth?

    Soupy Sales! I don't remember him very much - my dad was a fan - but his sons were all over rock in the 80s.

    Date: 2009-10-23 04:40 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] imaginarycircus.livejournal.com
    I honestly think Manohla Dargis is trying harder and harder to be AO Scott and Anthony Lane at their most ascerbic while lacking their sardonic charm. :/

    Date: 2009-10-23 04:44 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] dvanulya.livejournal.com
    A quick comment voting "no" on the .gay suffix, because that would make it ever-so-easy for governments who block sites based on their definition of objectionable content to block those sites. And they would be thrilled if it were made easier.

    (I'm still amazed every time I'm allowed to read afterelton, or afterellen, or pinknews, etc., shhh...)

    Date: 2009-10-23 04:45 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] dvanulya.livejournal.com
    Same here.

    Date: 2009-10-23 04:46 pm (UTC)
    ext_3685: Stylized electric-blue teapot, with blue text caption "Brewster North" (Default)
    From: [identity profile] brewsternorth.livejournal.com
    Last night I dreamed we were in London and I got drafted to play a grave digger at the Globe, but then the script was formatted strangely, and I couldn't figure it out.

    Sounds like a sort of intersection between Shakespeare and Samuel Beckett's Play. Weird, as you say.

    Date: 2009-10-23 04:49 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] sushis.livejournal.com
    As offensive as the "she's pretty, so her misfortune is more tragic--it wouldn't be so bad if an unattractive woman contracted a serious neurological disorder" message is, I'm much more offended by the way the report very strongly insinuates that the flu shot caused the neurological disorder, without providing any evidence whatsoever that there's any connection. This makes me think that there simply isn't any such evidence, and the report is fear-mongering for ratings in a way that's likely to actually cause a number of deaths by dissuading people from getting vaccinations.

    Date: 2009-10-23 04:51 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] ex-adarog.livejournal.com
    I remember Soupy. Wasn't he a regular on the game show To Tell the Truth?

    Date: 2009-10-23 04:53 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] bodlon.livejournal.com
    I caught the tail end of another "faggot" heavy conversation with shouting and laughing on the street yesterday. Sigh.

    As for .gay, I'm against on the basis that I can just see the expectation being that anything queer should be hemmed in to the .gay ghetto, leaving the rest of the Internet nice and tidy and safe for Regular Upstanding Citizens. Yeah, no thanks.

    I was unaware of that Earhart letter. Scandalized newspapers aside, I dig the sentiment, and like that she's someone else one can point to when it comes to a history of people in differently negotiated relationships.

    Date: 2009-10-23 04:54 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] rm.livejournal.com
    Also, you know Warren Buffet is poly, right?

    Date: 2009-10-23 04:58 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] bodlon.livejournal.com
    No, I didn't! Dang. Kind of awesome.

    Date: 2009-10-23 05:00 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] rm.livejournal.com
    I believe his wife passed away in the last couple of years and he soon thereafter married his secretary who had also been his lover for years and years and years and there's many photos of the three of them together socially. It's not widely discussed, but widely known and every once in a while an article pops up that mentions it in passing, but without the "poly" word. Will Smith and his wife too. You do know _that_ right?
    Edited Date: 2009-10-23 05:03 pm (UTC)

    Date: 2009-10-23 05:04 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] gallo-de-pelea.livejournal.com
    That was actually my first thought when I heard of the push for .gay domain designations. :/

    Date: 2009-10-23 05:10 pm (UTC)
    ext_3685: Stylized electric-blue teapot, with blue text caption "Brewster North" (whoops)
    From: [identity profile] brewsternorth.livejournal.com
    I hadn't heard of either. D'oh!

    Date: 2009-10-23 05:12 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] dremiel.livejournal.com
    Wow - you can tell I live in a fantasy world, I was thinking that subway encounter was going to end up as a compliment.

    Me, too. And now I'm a little squicked because the sad fact of it is that I was lulled into that expectation because I'm heteronormative and white and middle class and INVISIBLE.

    Date: 2009-10-23 05:21 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] frodo-esque.livejournal.com
    Just wanted to say that I love your sundries posts. =)

    And that I love Mira Nair and don't think all of her films are 'interesting failures'. If you mean in the US box offices-- then yes, technically they are...but as films I find them to be very risky and enlightening.

    Date: 2009-10-23 05:25 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] askeladden.livejournal.com
    I'm younger than you, and I learned about Soupy Sales in high school from reading this.

    Date: 2009-10-23 05:25 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] bodlon.livejournal.com
    Wikipedia mentions it briefly -- that his wife introduced her to the other woman before they quit living together, and that the three of them sent holiday cards signed from them all -- but yeah. Interesting!
    Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>

    February 2021

    S M T W T F S
     123456
    789 10111213
    14151617181920
    21222324252627
    28      

    Most Popular Tags

    Style Credit

    Expand Cut Tags

    No cut tags
    Page generated Apr. 30th, 2026 05:19 pm
    Powered by Dreamwidth Studios