Anyway, it's not bad. It's not really good either. Alan Tudyk's Q rating must be off the charts. He's so funny looking, but I watch him and I smile.
I thought the show did a great job of punching the emotional "aliens have arrived and this is what you've always dreamed of" buttons. I hate, as much as I expected, that they've changed the WWII allegory to post-9/11 stuffs. But even more than that, omg, can we not call the Visitors "the V's?" First it's confusing if you also watch True Blood where "V" is vampire blood taken as a drug. Secondly, it has an ugly, awkward cadence. Third, the first time the V gets spray-painted in the original series that means something. But, oh yeah, right, the Resistance metaphors have all been changed. *sigh*
On the other hand, I have established 3 distinct voices for my girls. News that particularly excites me: Hope is no longer coming off like a ditz, and Jean is just totally amazing and a surprise to me. Ashley I nailed a couple of days ago, so I'm not even worried about that. Several minor characters have also been established, including the 22-year-old gay secretary in Jean's department, and a recurring "fat guy in a dragon suit" who may be my new favorite person in the whole thing; I want to hug him.
Various backstory things have also been resolved, including the origin of Hope's email address (people, I just created a fictional B-movie called Con Vixen 77; god help us all). Also, I'm winding up with way more character diversity than I thought I would which is fantastic, but seeing as it's set at a con in 2010, I think I'm actually going to have to mention RaceFail in passing in the book.
Yesterday, I registered email addresses for Ashley, Jean, Hope, Evan and Stacey, which means that I will soon switch all those to the right thing in the text and will be putting up an excerpt (some of which you've seen a rough version of) on the NaNo site.
Additionally, my plan is to spend December editing and then send it to willing critical readers to look at while I'm away in the first half of January (so I'm not around to bug you). If you're willing to be a critical reader, let me know. I have a few people I already want to ask because they have skills in calling my shit on specific key issues (i.e., Jill, you're on comics duty; Sam or Sharon, if you'er willing you're on Chicago duty). Any fannish PoC who's willing to read for and call me on any RaceFail on my part (I already do have at least one reader who can address these things from personal experience, although our long-standing writing partnership means she's more likely to yell at me about my sentence length, hence the desire for more eyes on this issue) in this thing would be particularly desperately appreciated, since two of the three main women are PoC, and I would prefer to refrain from showing my ass and making people unhappy. I realize, of course, this is the Department of Not Your Job and my asking is potentially intrusive and privileged.
I'm probably going to try to keep my initial reader list down to about ten, but if you're interested in a hardcore way (as opposed to "gimme book now!" -- which you know I love too), please let me know.
I can't believe I'm getting this done. I can't believe this is happening.
1. Actually, I support the right to bear arms pretty strongly. I've been hunting more than once in the past, and I'm going to a shooting range with some folks in L.A., and I'm looking forward to it because I haven't been in ages. I've probably forgotten almost everything I know. I am also pro-choice, and, although I don't talk about it much, aggressively anti death penalty. The assumption that one political belief or fact about my life means that the rest of my views can be easily and obviously predicted isn't accurate or fair.
2. I give a great deal of money relative to my income to a number of organizations each year. These include Lambda Legal Defense, various political campaigns, and specific Donors Choose programs. Some of my Holiday gifts this year will probably be from Heifer International, and I am also planning on donating to Clitoraid and a few others. I go to protests and work for causes I believe in when I can, which is less than I would like. The idea that I am just whining in my journal and not doing anything about the issues I care about, when I give money and time in addition to speaking on these topics on panels and such when I have the opportunity to do so is ludicrous. Also, this journal is a platform. Maybe not a very big one, but I know it sometimes mobilizes people to take action when they might not have otherwise. So hey!
3. I'm not sure how to even address the whole "you're lazy/poor/use your disease as an excuse" thing when it's also put up next to "you're a horrible elitist" thing that also goes on around here. Look, I had a fantastic education, in large part through luck, and got out of college without debt mostly through hard work and a good scholarship. I'm privileged not to have certain financial burdens and to have parents that took risks to make my life different from theirs. I'm old-fashioned and arguably conservative in my feelings about tradition, language and even clothing in ways that I am coming to recognize can sometimes feel fail-y to other people. I am trying to stand by who and what I am, which is something very complicated and something I'm very proud of, while also trying to fail better. I resent a society that measures my worth by how much money I make or what professional success I have, and despite how much I brag here, I largely don't talk about the fact that I work hard and make money in a way that really should preclude some stripes of Republicans from saying I don't count because I'm not self-reliant. If this paragraph is intensely confusing, that's because sometimes I'm intensely confused by people's assumptions about me.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 03:25 pm (UTC)It seems about normal at this point. Not that I keep track of such things. But it doesn't seem any different than any other coverage.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 03:27 pm (UTC)The thing I haven't heard about is the rape in California. If I didn't read blogs and newsfeeds on the Net, I never would have heard about it. That troubles me.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 03:29 pm (UTC)Thanks!
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 03:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 03:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 03:36 pm (UTC)I almost got a chuckle from the fact that the county Coroner in the Ohio serial killer situation is named Frank Miller.
Also, the whole "why does this neighborhood smell so awful?" "Oh, it's the sausage factory" thing is right out of fiction.
YIKES.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 03:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 03:40 pm (UTC)On one hand, there's the chance that society has been growing numb to it. I kind of feel like if this had happened a decade ago it would be all over the news. (I also noticed yesterday that CNN's list of "most popular topics" had some story on Jessica Simpson at the top, and Cleveland's serial killer was listed fourth. I'll refrain from making a cynical comment on that.)
Around here, there is a LOT of discussion popping up about race on this case, and the discussion has nothing to do with the media. If you check out the articles on the topic at the Plain Dealer, take a look at the comments. The discussion in the comments turns to race on every single article.
A lot of blame is being placed on the police department. I don't think the police are racially driven to search/not search for missing persons, but I do think there were a hell of a lot things about this case that they could have done... better. There's going to be a whole lot of questions surrounding their reaction (or lack of) once this initial hype dies down. I'm predicting a royal reaming of the Cleveland police in a few months.
Also, the FBI has stated that the racial diversity among serial killers is pretty much the same as the US population. I'm trying to find where I remember reading that, but it was probably in one of my books on serial killers. *sigh*
no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 03:41 pm (UTC)Thank Sk0d , I'm not the only one.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 03:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 03:43 pm (UTC)I go on a fairly regular basis to a range here in NJ. If you want to come along some time let me know. I can provide toys.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 03:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 03:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 03:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 03:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 04:10 pm (UTC)Check my lj late Saturday/early Sunday for a locked post. ;)
no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 04:19 pm (UTC)It's not even metaphor in this series -- the aliens (most of them) ARE terrorists. Or, I should say, the show is calling them terrorists right away, so there's no metaphor. And I have to admit I'm glad that they didn't try to make it a metaphor, because I don't think, in this specific show, that it would have been done with a deft, light touch. It would have been an overt, clunky, heavy-handed cliche.
That said, I'm curious to see how the show handles the literal terrorism.
I'm a sucker for the conflicted-priest storyline, so they've got my viewership for at least these first 4 episodes.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 04:35 pm (UTC)Totally up for more serious reading later on if you want me to - I can volunteer on space detail, different sentence structure and Russian slang.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 04:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 04:39 pm (UTC)Isabel Allende has a YA fantasy trilogy starting with Cuidad de las Bestias. I couldn't really get into it because it's one of those YAs that starts with the mother having cancer, but it's not a difficult read.
If you have not read Como Agua Para Chocolate, it's the first novel I managed to finish in Spanish. A really good read and not very difficult. I haven't read any of Laura Esquivel's other novels, though.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 04:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 04:54 pm (UTC)Which is no more true for me than it is for you.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 05:22 pm (UTC)I totally agree with you about the "V's" thing; that's just weird. Especially since they've provided us with a perfectly good name to call them.
I actually thought it missed on those buttons, partly by a really early from-above view of the ship that made it less amazing, partly by giving us too much of a "they're really antagonistic" vision too quickly. There was definitely some great stuff mixed in there along those lines, though.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 05:24 pm (UTC)The article mentions the possibility of boys doing better at single-sex schools so they don't waste their time trying to get girls to pay attention to them.
That's funny, because I'm pretty sure I've heard it argued that women should go to single-sex schools because otherwise they waste their time trying to impress their male classmates. (I've also heard of studies that show boys do better in co-ed environments and girls do better in single-sex ones.)
Possibly we should just get the jump on "women are evil temptresses; science says so" people and start spreading the "men like to blame women when they [the men] won't take personal responsibility for their own actions and bad decisions" argument.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 05:38 pm (UTC)Those are largely because studies have shown that teachers of both genders tend to call on male students more often. In a co-ed classroom, girls can disappear as part of the intellectual landscape. Even at the college level, where women significantly outnumber men in many programs.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 05:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 05:48 pm (UTC)1. Oh, they're a celebrity. Big deal. They seem normal to me. "Hi, how's it going? Yeah, that's right. I think you're just another person. I'll take your autograph, though. Liked you on that show." GDL falls into this category.
2. OMG I LOVE HIM/HER OMGWTFBBQ THEY'RE TWO FEET AWAY. I CAN'T EVEN LOOK OVER THERE. I couldn't even approach the Bruce Boxleitner table at D*C. Because! TRON! and Babylon 5! Ask the people I was with. They'll tell you. Ditto David Duchovny. I LOST MY SHIT AND COULDN'T EVEN LOOK AT HIM UP CLOSE. I suspect I would be like this around John Barrowman so it's just as well if I am never in the same room.
So I fail at stalking.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 05:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 06:25 pm (UTC)on Spanish - no recs, but my sister has always sworn by getting copies of Agatha Christie's books in whatever language she's trying to immerse herself in as they tend to be easily available at used stores in that country and her memory of the original means she can skip carrying the dictionary around with her. Something you might try.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 07:04 pm (UTC)the name was purely incidental, i assure you (also, i had nothing to do with this, NOTHING!)
no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 07:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 07:11 pm (UTC)"The Court ... has actually received correspondence assailing its previous order in which the sender, who, incidentally, challenged the undersigned to a 'round of fisticuffs on the Courthouse Square,' asserted that the President is not human."
De facto President Obama must release his original X-ray films so we can see whether or not he is an alien lizard in human disguise. If not, we'll know he has something to hide.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 07:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 08:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 08:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 08:10 pm (UTC)Pack extra hangers. That is the absolute best thing we did. I shoved them in every empty spot we had.
Make sure to get coral safe sunscreen if you do snuba or snorkel because it is pricey there.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 08:11 pm (UTC)I didn't know sunscreen had to be coral safe. Where do you even get that?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: