Page Summary
graene.livejournal.com - (no subject)
eumelia.livejournal.com - (no subject)
rexluscus.livejournal.com - (no subject)
matthewwdaly.livejournal.com - (no subject)
tsarina.livejournal.com - (no subject)
marchek.livejournal.com - (no subject)
abnormal-apathy.livejournal.com - (no subject)
chris-walsh.livejournal.com - (no subject)
miep.livejournal.com - (no subject)
weirdquark - (no subject)
featherofeeling.livejournal.com - (no subject)
supremegoddess1.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ygrane.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2009-12-13 07:58 pm (UTC)I'm more worried that it appears no one teaches such a class anymore, and we're fast losing the generation of professional teachers who've ever been in one as a teacher or even a student.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-13 08:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-13 08:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-14 01:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-14 08:40 am (UTC)To me it's a matter of perspective. The information is out there, at the very worst you can take a five minute read of wikipedia and get some kind of idea about how things work - but that does not make it any more real or important in the eyes of many people. Yes it is important - it's the foundation of the country - but so many people are disenfranchised or apathetic towards the system that learning about it takes a back seat to the latest video game release, working 3 jobs to cover expenses, or getting table service at the club.
There are people who do care, and educate themselves - and they are the ones who will enter politics, and try to make something out of it all. Likewise there are the ones born into the system who will likewise continue their role as well.
Hopefully converting the disenfranchised and apathetic into being politically educated & active will change things.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-13 08:01 pm (UTC)Why can't sex be a fun thing? It keeps getting relegated to this "dangerous for your soul" thing, when really, it's your attitude.
"has never shied away from, nor made an issue of, her sexual orientation."
WTF does that mean?!
no subject
Date: 2009-12-13 08:02 pm (UTC)Yes, because it's the queer people themselves who insist on making an issue of their sexual orientation. Why can't they just give it a rest and be chill about it like all the people around them are?
ARGH I DON'T EVEN.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-13 08:11 pm (UTC)I am amazed at your endurance reading that CNN article, because I was mad back at the reporter noting how remarkable it was considering that Houston and Texas don't recognize even domestic partnerships. Buh?
And, while civics classes are always a good thing, the authorities were beating up non-cowering people even when we had them. I'd prefer to attack the problem at its source, by dropping the presumption that everyone driving across the border is a terrorist, or barring that to have cameras and microphones at every crossing point so that we can all clearly see the assault that the police officers endured.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-13 08:12 pm (UTC)This is true. However, back when we had civics classes, I I feel like I saw a lot less blaming the victim for exercising their rights.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-13 08:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-13 08:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-13 08:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-13 10:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-13 09:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-13 10:38 pm (UTC)Hello, those people! Don't get too distracted by how your job is to think about breasts! That's something lots of us like to do, but it's no excuse for shirts like those! That's lazy at best, sleazy at worst. Stop making people feel bad about breasts!
There will be a sweet spot found, helping people stay aware of breast cancer in a way that makes them smile, that is person-positive and breast-positive. Maybe someone's found that already. There are probably many ways. But this fail kind of tires me out, and I'm not dealing directly with breast cancer.
If I'm making no sense in this comment, tell me.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-13 10:40 pm (UTC)And yeah, as someone who has a major family history of breast cancer, has a friend who lost her mom to it this year and has another friend who had to fend off a rape attempt last night, my patience for those shirts is pretty extra spectacularly low right now.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-13 11:02 pm (UTC)Phew.
And yeah, as someone who has a major family history of breast cancer, has a friend who lost her mom to it this year and has another friend who had to fend off a rape attempt last night, my patience for those shirts is pretty extra spectacularly low right now.
Very understood, and very understandable.
This wouldn't be the funny way to approach the subject, but it could be another approach: An announcer saying "What if breast cancer affected the head? What if part of your head were at risk of going away? Like your mouth? [image of someone with blank skin where the mouth should be] Like your eyes? [same with the eyes] If part of you were at risk of being taken away, you'd take it seriously.
"Breast cancer. It's serious. You don't want to miss the people who have it."
I can imagine a symbolic approach like that: something may have to go missing because of cancer, whether it's part of someone's body or that very person herself or himself. (As I'm aware that men sometimes get breast cancer.) You'd have to choose missing body parts carefully so as not to squick the general audience: I doubt having the person in the ad appear with no left torso would get the point across. (And you don't want it to look like an injury someone's likely to get, like missing part of the lower jaw or a hand.)
This is a challenge. Fail like in that link still shouldn't have happened.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-13 11:13 pm (UTC)(I may be the friend
no subject
Date: 2009-12-13 11:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-13 11:17 pm (UTC)I was confused because technically it was pneumonia from the lung cancer, but she had breast cancer in 2000, and they never entirely sussed out which cancer it actually was this time around...
BLAH BLAH BLAH FUCK C*NCER.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-13 11:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-13 11:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-14 02:14 am (UTC)But yeah, 2009 *sucked.*
no subject
Date: 2009-12-14 02:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-14 01:59 am (UTC)I'm a member of Team Wench, and our biggest fundraiser every year is for breast cancer in the form of a Privateer feast. As you can guess from the name, we're a bunch of the Rennfaire people, so yes, a lot of double-entendres (and, to quote Pratchett, single-entendres and proud of it) are flying around and the mascot is a blue-footed booby. But the money comes from ticket sales and raffles of items aimed at both genders... and we've donated over $50,000 to breast cancer research.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-13 10:48 pm (UTC)I mean, I have some definite Pollyanna tendencies, but there is a fucking limit.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-14 04:05 am (UTC)I think it must be some stock story comment because New York Times article and the local (I'm in Texas) news site that I saw said pretty much the same thing.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-14 02:07 pm (UTC)"To show their support for a detained Iranian student leader, who was photographed in women’s clothes he may have been forced to wear, these men posted photographs of themselves wearing similar clothes on the Web."
Their protests include signs saying "It is not shame to be a woman, it is shame to be a man like you.” Apparently there are also protests of forced covering. An interesting subversion of gender shaming in order to protest non-explicitly-gender-related issues.
http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/10/more-support-for-detained-iranian-student/
http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/11/iranian-facebook-protest-continues/
no subject
Date: 2009-12-14 06:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-17 04:41 am (UTC)I live in Portland, Oregon, and our mayor, Sam Adams, is gay, and so is Gavin Newsome of San Francisco. Are we not major anymore? I missed the memo. Not to mention the previous governor of New Jersey, who is gay even if he was closeted at the time, and the mayor of one of our smaller cities who is trans. I'm sure there are many many more that I'm not recalling at the minute, but really, would it hurt them to do five minutes of research?
no subject
Date: 2009-12-17 04:43 am (UTC)