sundries

Dec. 17th, 2009 10:02 am
[personal profile] rm
  • The New York Times continues to think that the trend towards dressing up is their hot new over the last couple of years. The New York Times is increasingly the last to know about anything, but I'll take what I can get. This one is very much an outgrowth of the Mad Men phenomenon, but it pretty high on my "mmmm, yes, but no" list.

  • Laredo, TX has 250,000 people but no bookstores. via [livejournal.com profile] popfiend

  • You've got to love a photo essay on an amazing New York City home that includes the caption, "the bedroom, with even more items marked for sale." I am so there.

  • Get ready for the sound of me screaming. I haven't read it yet, but nothing titled, "Can Anybody Make a Movie for Women?" is gong to result in anything but my fury.

  • The sultry earth.

  • The Wall Street Journal weighs in on how much "heavage" men should show. This may be my favorite article all week. I'm not sure why, but it is.

  • Today is the International Day to End Violence Against Sex Workers. via [livejournal.com profile] shinysayyadina

  • I feel like a bit of an asshole linking this one as it's unavoidably full of "look at those wacky Japanese" and "geeks are losers" tropes, but Tokyo man weds video game character.

  • Jude Law 'in love' with 'Sherlock Holmes' co-star Robert Downey Jr. That's the headline exactly as CNN gives it to you, and I'm interested in it both as marketing strategy in terms of sound-bites on Sherlock Holmes and also because of the whole implied giggly/awkwardness of the headline in the rest of the article. I find this shit amusing on the surface and then quaint and irritating when I think about it, to be frank. Because CNN would _never_ use that headline in reference to men who were, you know, actually romantically/sexually in love with each other. That's the problem.

  • Speaking of Holmes: originally the two bits of Holmes hilarity coming out in the next couple of months (the one mentioned above and the sucktacular thing GDL is in) were just going to be odd campy amusements to me. But now I'm having to read all the Holmes stuff for my Bristol paper, so hey... I might be informed on the OMGWTFBBQ factor of these projects.

  • This is what abstinence-only education has wrought.

  • An origami crane folded by Sadako Sasaki is part of 9/11 memorial. My fellow children of the 80s, were you traumatized by 1,001 Cranes along with me? I can't believe that there used to be a whole genre of children's books, both fiction and non-, about nuclear war. Ah, the Regan years.

  • Patty has been keeping me up to date on the epically weird demise of the Washington Times, DC's bizarreo-land Moonie-run paper. If you haven't been following it, you can catch up here.

  • NCIS proving to be cool and useful.

  • The odds of my book being in-stock again from a major e-tailer before the deadline for Christmas shipping delivery is pretty low. I'm making a post office run on Saturday. If you want one $14 to me via paypal and I'll get it out then. Books will be in stock again soon, just not in time for Christmas delivery.

  • I forgot to mention how much I've loved how much you all love the name Martin.
  • Date: 2009-12-17 03:17 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] rm.livejournal.com
    Lesbian flick, right? I think I caught the end of it when Patty was watching it.

    Date: 2009-12-17 03:26 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] delchi.livejournal.com
    Technically, yeah. I didn't see it as a " lesbian flick " , but more of human drama because of all the relationship drama. I identified with the father of the bride quite a bit, and the little girl steals the movie. The thing I liked about it was that the lesbian bit was not treated as abnormal, just another part of the plot. The funny thing I thought was that every type of relationship is covered over the course of the movie - from the 'I'm divorced and never going out again ' mother , the not really happily married hetero couple, the sleezy "he would shag an open wound " ( actual quote from the movie ) single male ( who comes around in the end ) , the sensitive male who walks away so his gf/wife can be happy, the gay couple making out in the park , random people bumbling through relationships and buying flowers , and the family conflicts that make it all a giant mess.

    In the end I was left with a story about people in ( and out of ) love, and not OMG!!1111ONEONE!1LESBIANS!
    Edited Date: 2009-12-17 03:26 pm (UTC)

    Date: 2009-12-17 03:27 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] rm.livejournal.com
    I literally only say the last ten minutes which is why I'm all "lesbians, right?" but I should check it out in its entirety sometime.

    Date: 2009-12-17 04:58 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] svollga.livejournal.com
    I watced it not so long ago, and I liked it because it's just another romantic comedy. With girls as a main couple. Still just another romcom, with all the fluff and sappyness. (I love romcoms, actually.)
    Also, it has Anthony Head as the bride's father.

    Date: 2009-12-17 03:28 pm (UTC)
    ext_3685: Stylized electric-blue teapot, with blue text caption "Brewster North" (Default)
    From: [identity profile] brewsternorth.livejournal.com
    That sounds like a movie I might watch for fun, actually.

    February 2021

    S M T W T F S
     123456
    789 10111213
    14151617181920
    21222324252627
    28      

    Most Popular Tags

    Style Credit

    Expand Cut Tags

    No cut tags
    Page generated Apr. 29th, 2026 05:41 pm
    Powered by Dreamwidth Studios