The most moving of the plays is Racheline Maltese’s “Dogboy and Justine,” directed by Cash Tilton. The setting is a brothel that specializes in kink, and the company duly thanks David Menkes Leather for the scary props and costume pieces. All the working girls are getting clients but Mistress Justine, who has to content herself with a frequent and pathetic caller who wants to be treated like a dog. “Everybody likes dogs,” he explains.I can't tell you how good this review feels. Remember Dogboy & Justine continues to run as part of Act V: One Act at The Secret Theatre, Jan 20 - 23.
Though funny, Maltese’s work has a depth and poignancy that the other plays don’t access. The caller, played by Christian Barber, gets across an excruciating loneliness, even as we never see him. Stacy Ann Strong is the voice of his distressed mother, who sheds a sad light on why her son is the way he is. Melissa Ferraro plays Justine with a nearly maternal compassion; she’s not hard like the other girls Jeannie (Amanda Boekelheide), Erika (Laneshia Pryor) or Dynamite (Christy Richardson). This is a play that lingers in the mind.
Gary asked me to vote for 75 entries to stay. I struggled and struggled to get to that number. Being more generous than I wanted to be, I only made it to 40 on the first past. Eventually I got close to 75, but didn't hit it, and that was even after grading you people on a curve.
How many of you did I really think deserved to stay after reading all those entries? About 25. Maybe. You're lucky I was feeling nice.
Here are my general thoughts:
- Six sentences is not enough. In most cases, three paragraphs is not enough either.
- For the love of god, put spaces between your paragraphs if you want me to be able to focus on what you're writing about.
- There's a reason short fiction doesn't work for LJ Idol, and that's because short fiction is very, very hard to write. I don't know you, your characters or their issues. Short fiction is often harder to read than a novel, even if it is technically a bite-sized piece. I voted for very few of the fiction pieces, as mostly I found they had no point and no believable voice.
- I hate that Reader's Digest voice so many of you take on.
- I looked for pieces that felt like people would have written them as part of their journal even if they weren't competing in LJ Idol. I wanted a sense of organic relevance and honesty, which believe it or not, does come across even if I've never read anything else in your journal ever. Very few of you achieved this.
- Adjectives do not replace narrative!
- And for the record your excessive adverb use is strangling me. And not in the nice kinky way. But in the "I want to throw your sentences up against a wall over and over again until the extra words fall off" way.
- Similes and metaphors are your friend, but leading with cliched "this is my college application essay and I am like a great big tree soaking up knowledge" types of metaphors and similes is not how you make friends and influence people.
- "I hope this is okay" introductions about the inadequacy of what I am about to read: you are wasting my time. It's not humility, it's annoying.
- Endings that go nowhere fill me with rage. WHAT WAS THE POINT?
- Endings that assume the reader is stupid and spell out the point like five times. Assume your reader is at least as smart as you. Offer them a gift, don't shove it down their throat.
- Look, most of us aren't special snowflakes. Most of us have experienced loss, heartbreak and mean kids at lunch. Do not try to make your ordinary experiences sound special -- it makes them more mundane -- the value-add you provide is your observation and perspective on those experience. Way too many of you did not bring a value add.
- Knock it off with the sex. It's not that it's TMI. It's that it's boring. Again, what's sexy or interesting is context and observation. Talking about sex to be "edgy" reads, to me, as incredibly jejune and boring.
Because this is good.See, this is why I have to do it this way. Because I can.
This is almost like the last 207 days haven't happened, and almost like Jack didn't pay a masseuse for a hand job three fucking days after Ianto died just so he could have all the loss over and done and gone at once.
It is almost like, instead of burning his only photo of Steven, he had left it with Gwen instead.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 04:47 pm (UTC)I really don't understand everyone's aversion to fiction though. Maybe it's because I don't see LJI as a "journaling" competition as much as a "writing" competition. My whole goal was to write something new every week, and LJI has always helped me accomplish that.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 04:48 pm (UTC)I was curious to know if the structure of the first two parts of my entry (http://beeker121.livejournal.com/144208.html) worked for you (though I think I may have been suffering from the Reader's Digest voice you talk about.)
Ack: edited for bad link, sorry.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 04:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 05:01 pm (UTC)Anyway, this tl;dr comment is me just saying I really liked reading your thoughts on the whole process, etc, etc.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 05:02 pm (UTC)Stupid not having money to buy plane tickets and play tickets.
no subject
Well, heck. If I'm gonna play an "Idol" game, I shouldn't skip out Simon Cowell experience, should I?
Thanks in advance for your critique and for your time. I can imagine Gatekeeper status is eighteen kinds of a headache what with all the time and critique demands (to say nothing of any who might argue with you about your opinions).
ETA: It's been pointed out that asking for general critique is a bad idea, as it drops a lot more on the critic than a critic, perhaps, has time for. I guess what I'd really want to know is: What annoyed you most in my entry? I have a lot of things I need to improve upon in my writing and would love to know which ones are the most glaringly obvious.
Feel free to be brutal.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 05:14 pm (UTC)The article on going green/vegetarian/vegan was interesting. Although I have been seriously thinking of ways to conserve resources and eat healthier food, I also recognize that my income doesn't give me a lot of wiggle room. Plus, Sneider could really care less about any such initiatives unless it's something that will save him money. Also understandable. But to be honest, I think it's still really pushy for someone to take those initiatives and then expect everyone around them to do the same. I understand the benefits, but for many people, there are more disadvantages than benefits of adopting a green and/or vegetarian lifestyle. Putting pressure on them to do something they either don't care about or don't want to do is simply unfair.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 05:19 pm (UTC)In terms of my entry, my concerns are that I was overly aggrandizing normal experiences, that I was creating a false tension (by inserting critics with whom I could then argue), and that I was too flowery in my prose. So my question is, did it come across as genuine?
no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 05:38 pm (UTC)*grins*
no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 05:38 pm (UTC)Hey, dude, maybe he didn't show up because of lookie-lous like you.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 05:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 05:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 07:14 pm (UTC)Best and worst part of my entry?
no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 08:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 10:21 pm (UTC)I had intended to draw illustrations for this and have one sentence per page, but time failed me...or maybe I failed time. Either way, on to my question. Keeping in mind that this is intended to be a picture book, what is your first suggestion for revision?
Ha...I know you said one, but since I know what you are likely to think about my entry this week...feel free to tell me how you envision my sheep looking? Bonus points if you can draw one in paint for me. I really wasn't able to draw a Herman I was happy with!
no subject
Date: 2010-01-20 02:11 am (UTC)2] My own and only question regarding the Gatekeeper round at LJ Idol.. I think I fell into the trap of the 'Readers Digest' voice this week, instead of my usual unconscious channelling of Wodehouse, L'Engle, and Bradbury. Do you agree?
no subject
Date: 2010-01-20 02:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-20 02:36 am (UTC)Thanks for the input, it's always good to hear whats going wrong.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-20 04:04 am (UTC)Congratulations on the positive review as well. Makes me wish I lived a lot further East.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-21 07:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-26 10:51 pm (UTC)Likewise, I am turned off by cloying language, pathetic fallacy, and cliched metaphors.