The good news in
The bad news is that their insurance plan is trying to drop them, claiming it's because they paid a premium late in 2007. She's protesting this every which way she can (although if you have any expertise in this area and can help her navigate the process, that sort of help would probably be appreciated too), but things look grim. She hasn't been able to work regularly in months and without insurance the level of jeopardy her family is in (she's already been struggling to pay for her husband's medication) is going to increase exponentially.
For many of us it's always felt like barbarism enough when we've had to wonder if we could afford to keep a beloved pet alive. Imagine if someone was forcing you to have to think that about your husband.
If you can help her with $$, insurance navigation advice, other resources, please visit her journal. Her paypal is tribereddragon [AT] gmail [dot] com.
UPDATE: a pharmaceutical assistance program is going to pay for her husband's meds for a full year beginning March 1. But she still needs $2,000 to get him his medication for February.
At some point, I tend to feel I should set an official policy about what I will and won't link to when people need help, but life is murky and a lot of people need help, and I think it just has to be a matter of whim and random and gut. The less I know you or the person in need the higher the bar is going to be, because I don't have any real way of vetting this stuff. Which, by the way, means if you all see a story you want to help, do your own homework so you're comfortable!
Anyway, people in my life have also suffered from mysterious debilitating lung ailments, so Holly's story jumped out at me. If you feel you want to help, visit her website.
Look, perspective is good and so is helping people/being an activist/giving money.
But here's the horrible truth about existence: terrible things happening to someone else somewhere else doesn't suddenly give you the tools to not be upset by stuff going on in your own life.
More clearly: I have very little patience with people telling people what their priorities should be. I can be a queer activist AND donate money to Haiti. I can do clinic defense and still care about global warming. And I can write to my politicians regarding healthcare reform and still try to make an impact on global poverty.
I also, however, like everyone else, have limited resources, and I have about zero tolerance for people telling me I'm not allowed to be actively engaged in issues that affect my life directly because they view them as marginal or fringe (because they aren't queer, because they don't have a uterus, because they believe that good people never wind up screwed by the healthcare system) and think a good way to emphasize that marginalization (which they believe in as a righteous truth) is to engage in some apples & oranges suffering comparison.
Is there an issue you think I can make an impact on or might not be aware of? Tell me, but I will run out of time for you very quickly if the framework for that is that my issues as a [eighty billion boxes here] don't matter.
Finally, I don't think it's your business how much time and money I give to various causes and charities. I'm not running for public office. I'm not a role model. I'm not campaigning for some award. I do what I can. Sometimes with my wallet, sometimes with my little corner of the Internet. And it will always be a simple truth that I can always do better (I still, as an example, must post that EPIC charity list you all helped me assemble). But I don't owe you an accounting of these matters.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-01 03:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-01 03:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-01 03:19 pm (UTC)I can only imagine!
Patty says him being totally in thrall to various chicks is just sorta what he does throughout Buffy, which somehow makes the whole John Hart I-was-a-good-wife dialogue in Torchood about 800 times funnier.
I hadn't thought about it quite that way, but this is oh so very, very true.
But here's the horrible truth about existence: terrible things happening to someone else somewhere else doesn't suddenly give you the tools to not be upset by stuff going on in your own life.
Thank you. This needs saying more. I had this come up last year or perhaps the year before when I posted something about ongoing problems faced by the survivors of The Station nightclub fire and an upcoming fundraiser to help, and someone had to chime in to say, "Well, people are still suffering from Katrina too, and there are more of them." All I could do was shake my head and say something like, "And these are in competition because ... ?" As you say, apples and oranges suffering comparison. Pointless exercise in one-downsmanship.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-01 03:35 pm (UTC)I can go on and on about Spike much like I used to about Remus Lupin. ;-p
no subject
Date: 2010-02-01 03:45 pm (UTC)Look, perspective is good and so is helping people/being an activist/giving money.
But here's the horrible truth about existence: terrible things happening to someone else somewhere else doesn't suddenly give you the tools to not be upset by stuff going on in your own life.
You said this to me once and you're still right. When things get bad I recall this and don't feel do guilty about feeling glum.
Someone actually asked you how much money you give to charity?! Fucking nerve.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-01 03:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-01 03:45 pm (UTC)Oh, it does! There are fab in-jokes in Captain John Hart's dialogue, too.
"No blonde? You need a blonde."
I have a theory that (since RTD has said he loved Angel) that he patterned Jack on Angel for the immortal!annnngst.
Wait until you get to the musical episode. It even makes Exit Wounds funny. (Yeah, spoilery. And bad quality vid here - copyright claim.)
no subject
Date: 2010-02-01 03:46 pm (UTC)It's happened more than once, and I'm starting to get pissed about it. Which is a shame, as I think it would be informative for people to get a look at how my budget works in terms of what a NY creative spends on rent, professional development, recreation and charity, but now I'm pissed and not going to share.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-01 03:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-01 03:55 pm (UTC)And thank you,
no subject
Date: 2010-02-01 03:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-01 03:55 pm (UTC)for serious!
you had never seen spike? LULZ!
*gets suddenly painfully nostalgic for happy torchwood days of queer bickering*
no subject
Date: 2010-02-01 03:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-01 03:56 pm (UTC)Big ***hugs*** for you, by the way.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-01 03:57 pm (UTC)Also, at the rate you're going, you're going to pass me soon. I have to find someone up here who has season four for me to borrow. Sigh.
(Dru, Dru, Dru!)
~Sor
no subject
Date: 2010-02-01 04:17 pm (UTC)It reminds me of one of the worst panels I went to this year, a part of NextBig Nashville. The panel was on how artists and fans can get involved in and promote activism and charity, and while the organizations the panelists were representing seemed pretty decent (one was devoted to raising money so they could help people in Africa get clean drinking water; another was devoted to giving shoeless people shoes), some of the panelists were really awful. At one point, a guy behind me asked the question I'd been dying to ask, since most of the talk about charity had been about helping people specifically in Africa and nowhere else: Were there any current efforts raise money and/or awareness for certain causes closer to home, such as poverty in America or educational reform, et cetera? One of the panelists actually said this: "The way I see it, our problems here are certainly worth thought, but those people in Africa have far bigger problems than anyone back here in the US. I see the homeless here on the streets of Nashville just like you do, but they're still a lot better off than the people in Africa. It's about making a decision about which of these problems should be a priority. I think we should all be going for the 'big fish' when it comes to giving our help."
Not only did his response make him look incredibly ignorant and privileged in regards to the state of things in the US, but incredibly presumptuous: Yeah, the reason we're not talking about helping people over here is that YOU should be more concerned about people everywhere else. He also pretty much dismissed the validity of the point that there might actually BE people in the US who may need acts of charity.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-01 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-01 05:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-01 05:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-01 05:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-01 05:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-01 05:21 pm (UTC)I could go in depth into how I don't actually even agree with the sentiment, but it's just so... SPIKE. :)
no subject
Date: 2010-02-01 05:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-01 05:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-01 05:26 pm (UTC)