Vice TV aims to do totally transparent, process-oriented journalism, and I'll be frank in that they only partially succeed. For example, a piece on North Korea is riveting only because it's about North Korea since there's no inherent story that the piece is following beyond "wacky journalists go to North Korea." It works because the on-camera guy has charisma, and North Korea is weird and mysterious.
On the other hand, I fell hard for Swansea Love Story which is about heroin use in Swansea. The piece is very well-made and is, in places, hard to watch. It also really only pays off if you watch the whole thing, as the devices of the narrative don't really come full circle if you don't watch it all.
I've also been enjoying the Mecca Diaries piece which includes the amazing phrase "Satan stoning station" as a guy who works for VBS smuggles a camera along on hajj as he goes on the journey with his family.
There's a lot of crap on VBS and they frame a lot of stuff in wacked out sensationalist ways, but some of the actual material is quite something. If I were 20 and working hard at drinking scotch and trying to prove that I can be one of the boys, I'd be all over working for these guys. Instead, I'm just enjoying their stuff (after a lot of filtering).
no subject
Date: 2010-03-05 08:45 pm (UTC)I remember I once spoke to a friend who said she and a guy had sex three times in one night and I asked how many times he'd orgasmed and she said "three..." then the penny dropped. Amazing.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-05 08:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-05 09:04 pm (UTC)Now, whole conversations' worth of small talk strike me as a bit odd, in a "do people actually *do* that?" kind of way. Clearly, they do. It's generating bonding social capital, if nothing else*... it still seems a bit odd, though.
* 10 minutes of Monty Python jokes to establish geek cred is small talk, too.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-07 12:23 am (UTC)Oh if only that was an established norm in society. Oh the laughter :)
no subject
Date: 2010-03-05 09:05 pm (UTC)Highlights of the Third Doctor include Inferno; anything with the Master, because Pertwee and Delgado have a lovely dynamic; and the final story Planet of the Spiders is pretty good too, if a bit drawn out.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-05 09:10 pm (UTC)And yes, the stories featuring the Master are a must see. (Even though their resolutions were often cringe worthy)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-05 09:07 pm (UTC)Agreed. I mean, not just from the connotations of it (though clearly that), but that it's so overused it's lacking in imagination.
As for "quintessential Classic" stories: 'Curse of Fenric' is probably your best bet for Sylvester McCoy's Doctor; "Invasion" is probably the best Patrick Troughton story, and will put into context some of the Pertwee. Tom Baker is a tricky one, since a lot of his really good stories are in arcs.
Also, don't know if you have a multi-region DVD player, but I have the only-released-in-region-2 disc of the Eighth Doctor movie.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-05 09:09 pm (UTC)This is my personal rec list:
First Doctor: The Aztecs (though watching "An Unearthly Child" is probably a good idea just for context).
Second Doctor: The Invasion
Third Doctor: Inferno (I think this one will really gel with your interests)
Fourth Doctor: Rememberance of the Daleks AND City of Death
Fifth Doctor: Earthshock (I haven't actually seen much of the Fifth Doctor -- though I have seen this story -- but reccing it because this is another I think will gel with you.)
Sixth Doctor: If you have time, Trial of a Time Lord -- this one is probably interesting to you because the companion was originally slated to die, the actor WANTED her to die, but she was given a last-minute reprieve and a happily-ever-after ending. The actor felt that this cheapened the story. However, Trial is quite long, and if you want something shorter I'd recommend The Mark of the Rani.
Seventh Doctor: While my personal favourite is Battlefield, I'm going to recommend Rememberance of the Daleks, because it's a lot more significant in terms of Who canon.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-05 09:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-05 09:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-05 09:34 pm (UTC)Avoid the first doctor eps - I tried a few and they are unwatchably terrible. I recently rewatched much of the 3rd doctor (Jon Pertwee) eps, and found many as wonderful as when I watched them as a child. Inferno remains on of the best and most disturbing Dr. Who serials ever. I'd recommend that you try early episodes with 3 or 4, and see which one works better for you. I'd think 3, but that could be my own pro-3 bias showing. Liz Shaw & Sarah Jane Smith were both excellent companions (at least for the era).
What counts as sex?
Utterly baffling. At absolute minimum, it seems obvious that any activity where all of the people involved have orgasms would count as sex, regardless of what they are doing.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-05 09:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-05 10:02 pm (UTC)Classic Dr. Who: I second Caves of Androzani. (At one time I had every episode of Dr. Who and Blake's 7 on tape. Unfortunately in Beta format, LOL).
no subject
Date: 2010-03-05 10:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-05 10:23 pm (UTC)But I love the First Doctor, I love him the most of all the Doctors I've seen so far. I love Land Of The Giants with an unholy passion, and I think you would be fascinated/appalled/intrigued by The Dalek Invasion Of Earth. (It fascinated me right up to where I was so enraged I had to stop watching for a week or two over what they did to Susan.)
Fun fact for the evening: Almost every arc (four or more episodes on a single adventure) in the first Doctor's run passes the Bechdel test.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-05 10:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-05 11:43 pm (UTC)2nd Doctor: The Mind Robbers, which is one of the most meta things I've ever seen on television ever.
3rd Doctor: He's my favorite, so I'm crap at picking. The choices the others have listed are great. The Silurians might be a top choice if you want to watch him struggle with acting as part of an Earth military organization.
4th Doctor: Genesis of the Daleks for echoes of the time war, City of Death for a damn fine story with a time lord as a companion.
If you're watching more, The Keeper of Traken (very near the end of the run) features the Master pulling one of the creepiest shitty villain moves ever. Plot bunnies galore. It leads directly into Logopolis, which is a regeneration and a powerful one, and Castrovalva, in which the newly minted 5th Doctor is terrifyingly at a loose end (rather like 10's start, spent mostly unconscious).
5th Doctor: Earthshock is directly relevant to your field of study. Caves of Androzani is a regeneration, chock full of honor, and was recently voted favorite Doctor Who episode ever by readers of the main fan mag.
6th Doctor: My memory is spotty, though I like him. I defer to others.
7th Doctor: Remembrance of the Daleks and Curse of Fenric are neck and neck for "I'm getting too old for this" angst, foreshadowing the tone of new Who.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-05 11:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-06 12:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-06 01:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-06 01:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-06 01:37 am (UTC)Like, Jaws vs. a winter coat.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-06 01:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-06 02:01 am (UTC)Kinda is full of hardcore Jungian shit that went totally over my fifth-grade head, but is an excellent example of what serial television can accomplish.
I agree you'd like Pertwee, he is flamboyant and favors zippy racecars and flapping capes. And ruffled shirts! However his episodes were hard to come by when I was a kid, so I can't recall any of his specific stories except some of them looked like a Steve McQueen movie, and the Silurians are laughably silly to look at but I think it's an important episode.
Tom Baker is the most massive and overplayed era of classic Doctor Who in the US, I think it took our local PBS four years to show all his episodes and that's five nights a week. He is, however, the expected favorite Doctor for many good reasons. The Deadly Assassin is a good story with The Master. Logopolis - I think you should just watch all available regeneration episodes. It is, as someone said, pertinent to your field of study and those stories usually had extra weight.
Compare with, say, The Talons of Weng-Chiang, which is horrifying to the enlightened modern day viewer, but still entertaining in its cheesiness and verve.
I'm afraid this is little help to you, all I can say is that I was force-fed and adored the Fourth Doctor very much, but the Fifth doctor was my favorite. He was more internal, younger-looking, a bit more fragile, and that seemed an interesting conundrum for someone exposed to so much danger all the time.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-06 02:11 am (UTC)The Cybermen in Earthshock are also the stuff of nightmares. As Doctor Who goes on they get less and less human, less cheesy...it's very effective.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-06 02:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-06 02:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-06 03:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-06 04:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-06 02:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-07 12:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-07 12:22 am (UTC)