Buffy/Angel update
Mar. 28th, 2010 11:39 pmSo did Doyle really give his gift to Cordelia or was this just one of those things that TPTB decided on and everyone is being romantic and making it about Doyle? That all was handled in a really lovely way.
Once again: we may be pissed at Whedon for who he kills, but he walks us through the aftermath process. On one hand, we can argue that that's both good, and responsible, TV. On the other hand, I feel like it does keep us at a distance. Whedon deaths are never deaths that happen to us, because we watch the aftermath for those who get left behind. Not us. I'll need to watch this episode again for my paper even though it wasn't all that -- because Doyle had no possessions to leave behind, and that gets discussed that all that is tangible in his death is his absence.
Angel/Cordelia/Wesley is my new OT3.
Also, I thought Angel's initial confrontation with the Oracles at the beginning was interesting, because jeez, that's one of the conversations we've been having about Ianto in Torchwood fandom, isn't it?
But I did like that Giles's girlfriend was back, but wow I was surprised she wasn't in some way connected to the occult/the Watchers or SOMETHING. I didn't expect her to be a mundane sort of bad girl (because she does give off the vibe of totally being able to keep up with Ripper's ways).
Also, Ethan Rayne, what the fuck?
1. You never have more than half a plan.
2. You never have more than half a reason for your plan.
3. You can actually throw a decent punch, but won't at Giles.
4. THAT SHIRT.
5. Dude, you're like John Hart if John Hart was a pathetic washed-up impotent drunk.
Also, interesting to see we have a potential Gitmo narrative long before 9/11 actually happened.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 03:39 am (UTC)There are times I suspect that the whole point of that episode was to get Giles into that shirt.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 04:03 am (UTC)Yeah, it is. I also think it highlights something about what many of us expect from stories as opposed to what many of us expect from real life. I know when I watched the episodes about Doyle's death a few months ago, I was struck by how satisfying I found it, because Doyle's sacrifice really meant something; he saved people. When TPTB refused to bring Doyle back because it would cheapen his sacrifice, it made sense to me. I thought about why I couldn't feel the same way about Ianto, and to me personally, it's because I expect stories to be meaningful, and if I invest in a character and they die, I want them to die in a way that is meaningful to me -- and Ianto's death simply wasn't meaningful to me. And I know that sometimes (maybe most of the time) death in real life is meaningless too, and I know that meaningless death can be the point of a story (and, in fact, I think that Joss Whedon does that extremely well, as I think you will see in S5 of Buffy) -- but I suppose Ianto's death didn't make enough sense to me on a Doylist level for me to appreciate its meaninglessness on a Watsonian level (and there's the added stab that Ianto's supposedly heroic sacrifice was a failure and he actually got people killed rather than saving anyone). I know that Ianto's death was meaningful to you on both those levels, and to many others, so I can see why for you, that argument made by TPTB in Angel would resonate.
I'm looking forward to seeing how you respond to Wesley's character arc. It is, IMO, the best character arc in Angel. It does go to some very dark places though, and yeah, there are a lot of self-hatred issues, but it's also very much an arc of becoming.
Btw, did you finish White Collar yet?
no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 04:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 11:26 am (UTC)I agree! It's also the most depressing. I cried for him after the series finale :(
Wesley's the best character arc, but I definitely think my favourite character arc is Cordelia.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 11:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 11:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 02:01 pm (UTC)Also, thanks for the warning re: Wesley's character arc. I suspect I'm going to find this unpleasant.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 04:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 04:09 am (UTC)'hush' is srsly one of my all-time favorite tv episodes ever - i can't remember who said it, but i read it once in one of my film texts: (inexact quote is inexact) "the quickest way to ruin a film is to add dialogue."
i think 'hush' made use of the silences and visual very well (even though there was LOTS of dialogue, we just couldn't hear it) - not that i believe dialogue ruins films (i LOVE dialogue), but it's one thing to have a well-written script and another to have a well-made film
no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 04:39 am (UTC)What the producers were not prepared for was that they were going to have to fire Glenn Quinn so quickly into the series, and thus do the whole CordyVision thing that much faster.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 04:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 04:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 05:00 am (UTC)but then i read that that wasn't the case and his character was already written to die then (tho, the places i read it were all from ppl who had no ties to the production, so it was all speculation anyway)
but yeah... it's sad :(
no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 11:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 09:20 pm (UTC)agree that wesley had much funnier story, and his character arc is one of my faves
no subject
Date: 2010-03-30 06:58 pm (UTC)For almost a year after Quinn left the show, there were local LA radio PSA anti-drug spots he was doing, so I suspect that may have been part of some sort of court order thing.
Note that I'm not faulting the producers. Quinn was clearly a liability and needed to be cut loose, from their perspective. Just that the stories they told about why might not be completely true.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 04:29 am (UTC)As for Maggie Walsh (the psych prof), she actually freaks me out hardcore because I had a biology teacher who was exactly. like. her. Seriously, she looks so much like Professor Walsh that a classmate of mine actually asked if our teacher used to be an actress. Not to mention her mannerisms, which are exactly the same! I still can't get over it.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 04:35 am (UTC)Ekatarina, who is also enjoying your updates and responses
no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 04:36 am (UTC)Wesley, over the course of the series, is the character who I think grows the most. And in his own way ends up sacrificing the most. Right now, it's hard to see, but hang in there.
While I cannot YET burble about how The Body is so so much better than any other Buffy episode, Hush does come in at second. It is Whedon at his creepy best.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 04:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 05:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 01:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 04:52 am (UTC)I find the exact opposite - because the characters are grieving, I feel drawn into the loss rather than thrown out on my own. The last part of Serenity is absolutely the hardest to watch for me, because I care about both the character who is gone AND those who are left behind. Torchwood deaths hurt me a lot less (yes, even Toshiko) because they were just gone and forgotten.
"Hush" worked the same way for me - it was a bloody fantastic standalone episode, which is why it probably got the attention it did, but it wasn't necessarily as connected to the main arcs of the show as other episodes.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 05:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 04:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 11:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 05:01 am (UTC)ETHAN: You know you're really quite attractive.
Cut to Giles, looking bemused
I love that whole scene.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 02:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 02:20 pm (UTC)I'm not saying their relationship is canon (though I think based on what we learn in The Dark Age, it could be argued). I'm saying it's strongly subtextually implied -- slashy, in the original sense of the word.
Obviously it doesn't compare to an onscreen relationship like Jack/Ianto, but still.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 02:22 pm (UTC)Also, agree with the way it's cut. I was confused for a moment and then confused again when I realized he was talking to the waitress.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 02:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 05:19 am (UTC)And Wesley goes through quite a bit of growth on Angel. I think you'll really enjoy it.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 07:02 am (UTC)That last scene, with the three of them having breakfast, is one of my favourite moments ever. ::hearts them all::
On one hand, we can argue that that's both good, and responsible, TV. On the other hand, I feel like it does keep us at a distance. Whedon deaths are never deaths that happen to us, because we watch the aftermath for those who get left behind. Not us.
I shall have to ponder this.
It's really a TERRIBLE episode
Amen. Although it does some good things, mostly with Spike. That is, it puts him in a Hawaiian shirt, lets him attempt suicide and then gives him back his bite, all leading to the ending: "Come on! Vampires! Grrr! Nasty! Let’s annihilate them. For justice - and for - the safety of puppies – and Christmas, right? Let’s *fight* that evil! Let’s *kill* something! Oh, come *on*!”
I also love Spike leaning against walls and smoking cigarettes and pouting like he's a rent-boy.
LOL! You are not alone...
When demon!Giles chased her, I literally exclaimed "go paunchy mild-aged demon Giles!"
Giles as a demon is hysterical. And your observations re Ethan are making me laugh.
I love these posts! :)
no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 08:57 am (UTC)The Gentlemen from "Hush" were I believe the only one-season big-bad to make the list. They were just that creepy.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 09:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 11:33 am (UTC)I haven't watched a lot of Buffy seasons 1-5 to say, but it seems to me that Buffy finally got her own developing character arc come Season 6. I think she really grew as a character in that season. Before that, in the episodes I've seen, she's pretty much unchanged.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 10:11 pm (UTC)Umberto Eco wrote about this, saying that serial characters are stuck in a trap. If they grow too much, readers don't like them. If they don't grow at all, they're boring.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 10:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 12:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 02:21 pm (UTC)I think that was the key to his early success, so many teens could witness deaths and how Whedon perceives people *should* respond, it's an education that we dearly lack in.
I've said it before, I can survive character death with just a flinch but give me a cast reaction to it? I'm in tears.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 03:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 03:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-30 12:42 am (UTC)Actually any of the commentaries are worth listening to, because that level of appreciation and respect filtered down through everyone who worked on the show. It is the only place I have ever heard actors comment with real sincerity and admiration on the crew they worked with. Not just the "we have a great crew, but now let's talk some more about me", but "yeah, this is my big scene, whatever, just look at the amazing lighting on this, you would not believe how fast Ray got that set up. Ooh! and check out that chair, Carey found it himself at a garage sale. He is such a genius, you would not believe how detailed our sets out. Whenever I was having trouble with a scene I'd just go down and sit on the set and it got me in the space every time. Check out that shirt..."
And I'm babbling again...Joss Whedon is the only person associated with film or TV that I wish I could sit down and have dinner with based on his work in Hollywood. There are others that I think would make dandy dinner conversationalists, but he's the only one I want to talk shop with.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-30 02:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-01 02:14 am (UTC)