An article on comment policies on news websites completely misses the value and middle-ground offered by ongoing pseudononymous identities, while also grasping that yes, comments on news sites are waaaaaaay out of control.
I am, at the moment, listening to UK political announcements. Their politics are more grim and more like US politics than I would have suspected. On the other hand, seeing that even your conservative party is willing to praise art and literature (and then not denigrate it later) as the opening of a speech is bewildering to me. These things are seen as terrible to at least 50 percent of the US electorate.
My friend Kristin is in Italy right now, studying art history. This is her blog. If you like the idea of private pilgrimages, you should read it.
And, yes, I know the "blip in time" line is actually from the most recent of the radio plays and not the death scene. I was flustered. But hey, look, I really was in Cardiff
Indeed. Don't forget shrieking "NEEEEERRRD!!!" at anyone mentioning a love of SF/Fantasy.
But on the other hand, I can safely presume that David Cameron believes that the planet that he is standing on it way more than 6,000 years old, right? To Yankee ears, a politician calling themselves "Conservative" but OK with science seems like a massive contradiciton.
The widespread meme of "Proud of Being Ignorant" currently infesting the GOP over here in the US makes me worried that we will soon see reading beyond an 8th grade level being cast as a elitist affection.
Honestly, I feel like it's already like that. I learned about the Cultural Revolution in China the same year Dan Quayle started ranting about the cultural elite and, being a somewhat overwraught teen, became convinced that someone would come and beat me an break my glasses because I was studying Latin.
I see your Cultural Revolution, and raise you one Khmer Rouge roaming the countryside killing everybody wearing glasses, on account of them being too educated for the Shiny Happy Fun Worker's Parardise / Death Camp.
Which it why I am surprised that Sarah Palin wears them rather than get contacts or get LASIK instead...
I was in London in the last week of 1997, first of 1998. Your discussion of how fiction and the city overlap reminded my of the fun I had reading Gaiman's "Neverwhere" while in London.
Oh yeah. Even when the Tories were a real right wing party, they wouldn't have been spouting creationism stuff. They've never really been anti-intellectual, they've just tilted the system in favour of the already privileged. If anything, historically, it's been the hardline left in this country tending to be disparaging of the intellectualism as a bourgeois or upper class pursuit, but then our strongest leftist influences have been more socialist than liberal until very recently.
I can't get my head round pride in being ignorant, it's just beyond my comprehension how anyone could aspire to that :/
no subject
Date: 2010-04-13 04:26 pm (UTC)But on the other hand, I can safely presume that David Cameron believes that the planet that he is standing on it way more than 6,000 years old, right? To Yankee ears, a politician calling themselves "Conservative" but OK with science seems like a massive contradiciton.
The widespread meme of "Proud of Being Ignorant" currently infesting the GOP over here in the US makes me worried that we will soon see reading beyond an 8th grade level being cast as a elitist affection.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-13 04:51 pm (UTC)I'm less crazy now, but I felt safer then.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-13 06:41 pm (UTC)Which it why I am surprised that Sarah Palin wears them rather than get contacts or get LASIK instead...
I was in London in the last week of 1997, first of 1998. Your discussion of how fiction and the city overlap reminded my of the fun I had reading Gaiman's "Neverwhere" while in London.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-13 07:13 pm (UTC)I can't get my head round pride in being ignorant, it's just beyond my comprehension how anyone could aspire to that :/