- OMG, Riley, REALLY? You're patronizing vampire hookers so you can be dark enough for your girlfriend? This is the most fucked up plot ever, and, quite frankly, sort of a stupid one. But I've always thought Riley was such a dumb lug, that I'm not riveted by this complete absurdity Wheedon has visited upon us.
- Aliens! There are canonical aliens! Man, that thing, that whole ep, was TERRIFYING. Except, you know, the part where Riley was being distracted because he wanted to go visit some more whores.
- Willow was AMAZING in "Listening to Fear"
- This whole arc in which Joyce eventually bites it (yes, I have that spoiler and the Tara spoiler) is going to be really hard for me to watch. I have an acute medical phobia that manifests in weird ways -- it's not about the gore, it's about the lack of control, medicine as punishment and my own probably not so awesome genetic odds. And this is punching those buttons hard.
- I really don't like Glory. She's just not a bad guy I find interesting and I think I really dislike the actresses performance, although it's clear she's just following directions. I am, however, really curious about Ben and the whole cosmology around her now.
- And I forgot to mention about "Fool for Love" the other day that hey RTD, you really liked SPike's little "you're connected to people and that keeps you alive" speech, didn't you? Well, good to know that Torchwood isn't _just_ about the
no subject
Date: 2010-04-25 03:07 pm (UTC)I only know what an intervention is via Buffy but I know lots of families affected by alcoholism.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-25 06:14 pm (UTC)I think it much be a product, in part, of different liability laws here vs. elsewhere, and also this sense of "if you have sex or drink before the age we say you can, soon you'll be a drunk-driving heroin addict fucking animals in front of the elementary school." We're very high strung here.
I only know what an intervention is via Buffy but I know lots of families affected by alcoholism.
This is the most stunning thing I have ever heard. I assume part of it must be that American culture has a self-help book of the week streak and an airing of dirty laundry in public streak that make interventions right up our ally, but I'm still stunned by this.
I'm also interested in your casually uttered "broken society" -- I heard that phrase constantly in the rhetoric when I was in the UK and it's not one we use here. It was hard to hear it as an American and understand that it wasn't code for "women in pants not going to church enough and homosexuals roasting our babies" which is what it would be code for here.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-25 07:15 pm (UTC)And yeah, broken Britain - I did use that self-consciously. As you say, it's a big buzzword in the press at the moment, mostly, if you'll forgive me being cynical, designed to convince us we're about to slide into anarchy if we don't all vote Tory, and/or get out of Europe, lock up all teenagers, treat people on benefits with the mistrust they deserve, stop immigration, and hang paedophiles. Perhaps not really that different from how an American might understand it, except we have different focuses for our national paranoia :)
Re IDing, our laws are, to be fair, much stricter now than when I was a teenager - I get checked a lot more at nearly 30 than I ever did when I was underage. But yeah, I think there is more of an attitude here that it's normal and healthy to push those age boundaries a bit, plus a layer of laddish pressure that you ought to want to, or at least that's the case within my typical peer group - I've worked in pubs for years, so I've had a lot of exposure to booze-centred culture (and seen some lovely people dead from liver disease, and my ex's dad drank himself to death, and my mother married an alcoholic, so I can see both sides here).
no subject
Date: 2010-04-25 07:17 pm (UTC)But the idea of "staging an intervention" for any type of addiction or related self-destructive behavior (i.e., an eating disorder) is ubiquitous in the culture here. I wouldn't say everyone I know has been to one, but I don't know if you could find anyone in the US who didn't know what one was, or at least have a friend of a friend story about it.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-25 07:25 pm (UTC)So it's gone beyond even addiction or specific self-destructive behavior and into "There's something broken with you and you don't want to address it, but we're going to."
no subject
Date: 2010-04-25 07:26 pm (UTC)Another UK take on it
Date: 2010-04-26 07:07 am (UTC)It strikes me that if you staged an intervention in the way it sounds in US media in a UK setting that you'd be cutting across so many and such deep-rooted social taboos that if the interventionee turned round and killed you they'd have a sporting chance of getting away with "manslaughter on the grounds of extreme provocation".
no subject
Date: 2010-04-25 07:20 pm (UTC)I hadn't know that the idea of interventions was US-only, but it really doesn't surprise me in the least. It very much seems part of the US mixture of puritanism and the sort of nosiness which isn't always a bad thing.
I'm also interested in your casually uttered "broken society" -- I heard that phrase constantly in the rhetoric when I was in the UK and it's not one we use here. It was hard to hear it as an American and understand that it wasn't code for "women in pants not going to church enough and homosexuals roasting our babies" which is what it would be code for here.
*nods* that was also my reaction to this phrase.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-25 07:14 pm (UTC)While I would never describe myself as the most overwhelmingly responsible of drinkers, there was also never a mystery around alcohol for me. I was allowed to have wine with my family as young as 13 or 14, and starting as young as 17, I knew of bars I could go to on my own and be served.
But yeah: America has a terrible alcohol mystique, and it causes no end of problems when people get to college and suddenly, perhaps for the first time, have access to it.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-25 07:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-25 07:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-25 08:25 pm (UTC)I mean, I won't pretend I'm a saint, but I don't much like getting drunk, so I'll often switch to soft drinks, and in a pub where everybody knows me, I have to keep on accounting for myself, explaining myself, laugh off all the teasing, refuse offers to buy me a "proper" drink (very tactfully, because this can be read as rude) over and over again. So many times I've ended up drunker than I've meant to in those situations, and I don't even much like it. And though this is quite a particular, and working class, environment, I think the same ideas ingrained at a lot of levels in our culture, much as it's sometimes characterised as being a lower class problem. I've often seen City types - stock market workers, rich people, in nice suits - on their hands and knees in the gutter at 2am in the City of London.
I probably sound like I should write for the Daily Mail now, and there is certainly a side to it that is sociable and fun and a bit of cutting loose does no long term harm, but if you're a person who's predisposed to have a problem, then you're in the worst possible environment, and you'll grow up to be my ex's dad, with nothing else to fall back on.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-25 08:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-25 08:43 pm (UTC)I should apologise for getting slightly impassioned above - I'm not really evangenical about this stuff; generally, I do think it's true that the media whips things out of proportion, and I certainly participate too much in that kind of culture to really be on my high horse about it - but I'm also quite finely attuned to the point where it gets beyond a joke, for the reasons mentioned above.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-25 08:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 07:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 12:26 pm (UTC)