Weirdly, the whole thing has put me in a nostalgic mood regarding the Bustle Ball I went to without her (I think she was on a dig) after judging a fencing tournament (Oh god, fencing. There's a mess I don't know how to fix, because I miss it so much, but I'm also way less stressed and not having my gender, intelligence, value, personal body awareness challenged inappropriately every two seconds anymore). I was in an unspeakably foul mood and exhausted from travel (I had to take a train back down to NYC from the tournament and then up to New Haven), and the night ended in me on my hands and knees in my finery scrubbing scuff marks off the floor while I made Ianto time-travel jokes after I'd seen all of one episode of Torchwood. I expect this to be more pleasant but just as funny.
I also wonder, a bit, how I'll be received, as this is a large event with a crowd I don't mostly know, and my experience of historical (especially American history) reenactment types are that they are either awesome liberal pervs who adore me or wacked out conservatives who think I'm going to hell for wearing trousers (and let's not even discuss what's in my trousers, shall we?1).
First, I feel really bad for you guys going through the type of fraught uncertainty we experienced in 2000, and I hope it works out better for you all than it did for us.
Second, it was very weird to be in London during the first televised priministerial debate. So much of the coverage was about how to make it look like a movie, like in the US.
Third, I find this photograph eerie and unpleasant. It would make a good comic book panel.
Fourth... it's incorrect for me to say class, I suppose, since in the US we do mean it differently than its meant in the UK (here class is a nearly pure function of money except in certain small pockets; this addles me particularly because I grew up in one of those pockets), but I am interested in a certain degree of what, as an American, appears as honesty to me in terms of who your politicians have contempt for. I don't see, from my perspective, wealthy men who hate the poor trying to convince us they are average guys with mediocre attainments and sympathies for those making minimum wage. Oh no, you know who the candidates think the enemy is over there. At least comparatively. Here's you have the richest, most elitist dudes telling you their just folks, and anyone with an education is out to get you. My perspective may be wonked, but that's how it feels from here.
Fifth? Best UK election coverage so far other than that weird wrestling candidate infographic the BBC has going on? Paul Cornell on Twitter. I mean, if you can stand him talking about various candidates mating. Once you see it, you can't unsee it. Tom Price, who's a bit more obviously cranky, is also pretty good.
Sixth: Citizens for Undead Rights and Equality. That's all I'm saying. You have a country with a Zombie/Vampire rights party and people are somehow puzzled by the Ianto Jones memorial at Mermaid Quay?!?!?!?! Let me repeat this folks, Citizens for Undead Rights and Equality. via
1 Long, albeit somewhat obvious, story referenced solely to torment
no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 01:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 01:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 01:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 01:37 pm (UTC)I've just become increasingly of the opinion that Americans should always issue TONS of disclaimers when trying to talk about class in the UK, and someone like me should issue tons of disclaimers in trying to discuss it at all, because for fuck's sake I went to Miss Hewitt's Classes for Young Ladies. My perspective is WARPED.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 01:55 pm (UTC)That said... ...if you're going to name a kid Whatever, I do tend to agree... name it that, and be done with it. Spelling it all wacked, then pronouncing it the same, doesn't make it different and unique. If you wanna be different and unique, be different and unique.
And I say this as someone with a unique name... and with a friend with an oddly spelled name, Wynnde--who HATED her name because noone got Wendy out of it.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 02:20 pm (UTC)I don't have a pirate icon right now, though. But you should imagine one.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 02:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 02:30 pm (UTC)That's interesting, because that's more or less exactly what a lot of us see, especially in the Tory party, or if not actually hating the poor, just plain absolutley not understand them or the challenges they might face. David Cameron does PR backflips to pretend he's just normal bloke Dave, with a normal man's problems - his oppostion's favourite way to slander him is to remind us all he went to public school - in the British sense - and his grandad was a Baronet.
Perhaps it looks different to you because the mistrust comes from a different place? It's not that he has money or an education that's the problem, just that it's telling where he got them (which, yes, class, and I thank you for having the sensitivity to recognise the need for disclaimers because there are some deeply rooted cultural instincts at work here).
no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 02:37 pm (UTC)There is a reason that North Florida gets referred to as Baja Georgia.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 02:54 pm (UTC)I think it's kinda cool.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:08 pm (UTC)Of course, the UK doesn't have a pathological hatred of intelligence and education that the US has, so the lies your politicians tell are different.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:31 pm (UTC)And forgive me if I take a moment to find the implications of "up to" really rather... huh. Some of us feel the staging and framing of the debates were rather a step down from the other similar institution we've had for years - Prime Minister's Questions - on account of how very much they were about appearances and not a lot else.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:33 pm (UTC)candidates here . The man at the left hand side is certainly wearing an SNP rosette and the man at the right end a liberal one; I'd equally believe the man in the kilt was Donald Maclaren of Maclaren (Ind) but the BNP chap is a poser.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:34 pm (UTC)1. Most of the American electorate would not have understood the level of discourse, which wasn't that high.
2. No god!
no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:43 pm (UTC)Yeah. So would the corresponding photo if there is one from the Witney results. (The Official Monster Raving Loony Party candidate was on David Cameron's right.)
no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:46 pm (UTC)