Ceremonies start for domestic partnership in New York. This is complicated, because first they aren't "civil union" they are "domestic partnership" and convey a very limited number of rights that are relevant only at the city level. They are also open to straight couples as well, and in fact more straight people in NYC than gay people register for DPs. On the other hand, it does acknowledge that we deserve better.
Last night on Buffy: Willow goes goth to avenge Tara's death. The opening of this with Willow sobbing over Tara's body, that was wrenching and got me far more than the previous episode. Also, shit, Osiris is scared of her. This is ... DON"T THEY HAVE WATCHERS FOR WITCHES WHO COULD BLOW UP THE WHOLE PLANET?
A guy I knew from college worked at Seton Hall for years, he was a devout Catholic who would never let himself date anyone because he was gay and felt terribly guilty about it. Awesome guy, such sad self-torture. Seton Hall had nothing to do with it; this link just reminded me of him, and I felt sad for him again.
hrm. It ate the rest of my comment which was to say 2 GIG is a lot. I don't watch streaming video but am a heavy data user and have never hit that much. Plus our current contract is in effect so we won't lose the unlimited data.
Re: the Pakistani marriage case, the younger person involved is a Hijra, who are considered to be neither men nor women, and who have recently received legal recognition as people of a third gender in Pakistan. An earlier BBC story on the incident identifies Rani Sangeeta as a eunuch, which is also problematic but is more accurate than referring to her as gay. I hope for justice and freedom for Rani Sangeeta and Malik Iqbal, whether or not they are in a relationship and intend to marry. BTW, you shouldn't read the comments on the Advocate article if you value your sanity points and blood pressure.
Well, as the thoughtful Stephen Fry thinked into pixels recently, reading the comments on *most* news articles on the Internet is usually not worth the detrimental impact on one's blood-pressure.
I think I had figured out from other articles that this incident did indeed involve a hijra. I hope for justice too - not just for Rani but for all other hijras who might be threatened by similar cases at present or in future.
Here's what really worries me, though: my plan with AT&T is a special data-only plan for HoH/deaf people. Is that going away or being charged more for, too? If so, that's a *huge* problem, and potentially legally actionable under the ADA. I depend on that data access because I can't use a telephone.
To clarify, AT&T has announced they will support iPhone tethering upon the release of iPhone OS 4.0. So it may not be immediate.
Why they have to wait for that release, I have no idea. Stalling, maybe? Because 3.x supports tethering and has been used by non-US carriers for about a year now.
*And* they're going to be charging for tethering, on top of having a data cap. C'mon guys, one or another!
I don't even want to get started on my iPad data plan options changing only a month after purchase....
Two things to note about AT&T’s bye-bye-unlimited-data announcement.
AT&T’s high-speed (“3G”) high-speed cellular network is generally reputed to be awful; Verizon and Sprint (whose networks are not compatible with the iPhone) have built out their networks more. The exclusive deal with Apple for iPhones has been a godsend for AT&T, because it gives people an incentive to sign up for AT&T data plans in spite of the crappy network.
My Nokia N900 can connect to Wi-Fi hotspots, and if I’m in a place with such a hotspot, it can automatically send data through Wi-Fi rather than using the cellular network. Is this standard on iPhones and other Web-browsing phones? If so, the restriction on how many megabytes per month you can send through the cellphone network wouldn’t be so onerous.
(Disclaimer: I work for Nokia, which sells phones that work with AT&T’s network, and which competes with Apple in the smartphone market.)
Maybe. I can speak more to non iphone smart phones and blackberry devices. Specifically the blackberries can be set up to do that or if they are on enterprise servers they can be restricted. I will tell you that we have had much much better luck in Memphis with the ATT 3G than with Verizon which made me weep because we had so much data issues. In general outside of that area our users complain about ATT and worship Verizon.
I am pretty sure the iphones can be set up like that because the ipod touch does the same thing.
Set up to do what automatically? If you mean joing Wi-Fi networks, all the options are under Settings->Wi-Fi. By default the iPhone asks to join any Wi-Fi networks it sees. If you turn off "Ask to Join Networks", you need to manually select the network.
And even if you don't have it set to automatically join Wi-Fi, when you go to use Safari or an app that requires an internet connection, the phone will ask if you want to connect as long as there is a network available.
I'll play around with it. Currently, I'm on an unlimited plan, so it shouldn't change--I'm more concerned about it changing when I upgrade my phone in July to a different smartphone. If I can keep the usage under control, I can spend less. We checked the bill last night, though, and I was just over 2GB last month.
I checked it when I heard about the plan changes. To be fair, it would be cheaper to get the cheaper limited plan, but I don't know if I can curb my usage that much! I'm 8 months pregnant, not supposed to be at my computer often, and don't have a laptop. *cries*
DON"T THEY HAVE WATCHERS FOR WITCHES WHO COULD BLOW UP THE WHOLE PLANET?
Re: Chinese school for 'sissies' - UM, gender disparity causing some unexpected results much? There's a ton of gender stuff to study in that massive experiment called the 'one child policy' - this is the just the latest wrinkle.
Prior ones include fat farms for that one espeshial boy of yours. No, really.
no subject
no subject
Have fun at the CdS thing!
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I think I had figured out from other articles that this incident did indeed involve a hijra. I hope for justice too - not just for Rani but for all other hijras who might be threatened by similar cases at present or in future.
no subject
N.
no subject
no subject
Yep, that's Mah Town - Porn Capitol of the World!
no more data
Here's what really worries me, though: my plan with AT&T is a special data-only plan for HoH/deaf people. Is that going away or being charged more for, too? If so, that's a *huge* problem, and potentially legally actionable under the ADA. I depend on that data access because I can't use a telephone.
Re: no more data
Why they have to wait for that release, I have no idea. Stalling, maybe? Because 3.x supports tethering and has been used by non-US carriers for about a year now.
*And* they're going to be charging for tethering, on top of having a data cap. C'mon guys, one or another!
I don't even want to get started on my iPad data plan options changing only a month after purchase....
no subject
no subject
AT&T’s high-speed (“3G”) high-speed cellular network is generally reputed to be awful; Verizon and Sprint (whose networks are not compatible with the iPhone) have built out their networks more. The exclusive deal with Apple for iPhones has been a godsend for AT&T, because it gives people an incentive to sign up for AT&T data plans in spite of the crappy network.
My Nokia N900 can connect to Wi-Fi hotspots, and if I’m in a place with such a hotspot, it can automatically send data through Wi-Fi rather than using the cellular network. Is this standard on iPhones and other Web-browsing phones? If so, the restriction on how many megabytes per month you can send through the cellphone network wouldn’t be so onerous.
(Disclaimer: I work for Nokia, which sells phones that work with AT&T’s network, and which competes with Apple in the smartphone market.)
no subject
I am pretty sure the iphones can be set up like that because the ipod touch does the same thing.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
DON"T THEY HAVE WATCHERS FOR WITCHES WHO COULD BLOW UP THE WHOLE PLANET?
no subject
Captain America wouldn't stand for his actions.
no subject
no subject
Prior ones include fat farms for that one espeshial boy of yours. No, really.
no subject