PSA: rules of the road
Aug. 10th, 2010 02:13 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Hey. Can we talk about guns for a second?
Okay.
Guns, more or less, are for killing shit. Even when you're shooting targets for sport, that's a training activity related shooting accurately in case you actually want to kill shit.
And you know what? That's okay. Maybe you hunt. Maybe you're in law enforcement. Maybe you're military. Maybe you're learning to use a gun for self-defense. Maybe you just really enjoy target shooting or are a competitive sport shooter and it is, for you, an abstract exercise. Maybe you're trying to become familiar with guns so you can make your own decision about them.
All that stuff can be debated. Whether or not hunting is okay. Whether or not police should have guns. Whether or not we'll always have war. Whether or not guns are an effective means of self-defense.
But this post isn't about that.
This also isn't about gun control (which, btw, isn't about "Yes" or "No" but a range of legal issues surrounding gun ownership, use and sale).
This is about, CAN WE ALL JUST AGREE THAT GUNS ARE FOR SHOOTING THINGS?
And that generally, shooting things means harming/destroying them in some way?
Now, sure, guns don't kill people, people kill people. But a gun's purpose is, as reviewed previously, essentially for killing.
Of course, other things can kill people too and even be repurposed as weapons -- like cars and airplanes. But neither of those things are explicitly designed to be weapons or lack other uses. Guns, on the other hand, pretty much are just for shooting shit.
So here are a bunch of things that are not equivalent to guns, gun ranges, or gun instruction:
airplanes
flight schools
cars
driving school
mosques
Islamic cultural centers
To say otherwise is disingenuous and illogical, and no, "I'm just playing devil's advocate" is not an excuse to be offensive about this.
I have Christians, Jews, Muslims, Pagans, Hindus, Buddhists, and atheists reading and participating in this journal. Probably a whole bunch of other belief systems too. There are folks from all over the world, all ages, all races, playing along here.
So, if someone says to you "that statement is racist," they are not calling you a racist. They are saying you said something they feel is racist. Please debate with this in mind. Also, please refrain from calling people racists or what-have-you unless you are pointing out a systematic pattern of behavior.
Please also keep in mind that concepts and terms that may not be loaded where you live, may be deeply loaded where someone else lives. Sometimes people can say really offensive shit and not only have meant no harm by it, but really, have no idea it could cause harm elsewhere (i.e., acceptable uses of "Asian" and "Oriental" are different in the US vs. the UK and elsewhere and mean different things in various places; "English-only" as a policy in a multi-national corporation is different than "English-only" as a policy in a school district where 80% of the kids are recent immigrants; etc).
Also, I would appreciate it a lot if we could try to play by the rules of the subway. If someone says you've said something hurtful to them and you don't get it after going three rounds over it? Just fucking apologize and move on.
Because honestly? Sure, some people like to make a career out of taking shit personally. But most of the time if someone speaks up to go "wow, this made me really uncomfortable" it's because they're really uncomfortable, not because they want attention. Chances are they want anything but.
So if you wanted them to feel that way? Fine, own it. If you don't give a shit if they feel that way? Fine, own that. If you don't get it? Own that.
But don't tell them how to feel or that they feel too much. And if you feel those emotions are coming from biases, then suggest they examine them, but you can't tell people how to feel, mainly 'cause it doesn't work.
Now, of course, I'm no expert in any of these things. I fight and argue on the Internet where PEOPLE ARE WRONG all the damn time. And I've absolutely, and rightly, been called on for saying racist and ableist shit (I hope it's the sort of thing I keep learning from), and I've been incensed by other people's emotions and engaged in ad hominem attacks and been called on shit that I totally haven't gotten, maybe right or maybe wrongly.
But can we try? Because I try. I'd like it if you fucking tried.
I won't be policing the journal for this shit. I don't have the time, and I'm not interested in being a cop. When I ban people, which is rarely, it's because I've lost my patience and they've made it abundantly clear they do not view me as a human being. So bans: unlikely and at random. Live in fear, or, more rationally, don't worry about it; you're probably safe.
But try not to be assholes, okay?
And a mosque is not a gun is not a car.
Thank you.
Okay.
Guns, more or less, are for killing shit. Even when you're shooting targets for sport, that's a training activity related shooting accurately in case you actually want to kill shit.
And you know what? That's okay. Maybe you hunt. Maybe you're in law enforcement. Maybe you're military. Maybe you're learning to use a gun for self-defense. Maybe you just really enjoy target shooting or are a competitive sport shooter and it is, for you, an abstract exercise. Maybe you're trying to become familiar with guns so you can make your own decision about them.
All that stuff can be debated. Whether or not hunting is okay. Whether or not police should have guns. Whether or not we'll always have war. Whether or not guns are an effective means of self-defense.
But this post isn't about that.
This also isn't about gun control (which, btw, isn't about "Yes" or "No" but a range of legal issues surrounding gun ownership, use and sale).
This is about, CAN WE ALL JUST AGREE THAT GUNS ARE FOR SHOOTING THINGS?
And that generally, shooting things means harming/destroying them in some way?
Now, sure, guns don't kill people, people kill people. But a gun's purpose is, as reviewed previously, essentially for killing.
Of course, other things can kill people too and even be repurposed as weapons -- like cars and airplanes. But neither of those things are explicitly designed to be weapons or lack other uses. Guns, on the other hand, pretty much are just for shooting shit.
So here are a bunch of things that are not equivalent to guns, gun ranges, or gun instruction:
airplanes
flight schools
cars
driving school
mosques
Islamic cultural centers
To say otherwise is disingenuous and illogical, and no, "I'm just playing devil's advocate" is not an excuse to be offensive about this.
I have Christians, Jews, Muslims, Pagans, Hindus, Buddhists, and atheists reading and participating in this journal. Probably a whole bunch of other belief systems too. There are folks from all over the world, all ages, all races, playing along here.
So, if someone says to you "that statement is racist," they are not calling you a racist. They are saying you said something they feel is racist. Please debate with this in mind. Also, please refrain from calling people racists or what-have-you unless you are pointing out a systematic pattern of behavior.
Please also keep in mind that concepts and terms that may not be loaded where you live, may be deeply loaded where someone else lives. Sometimes people can say really offensive shit and not only have meant no harm by it, but really, have no idea it could cause harm elsewhere (i.e., acceptable uses of "Asian" and "Oriental" are different in the US vs. the UK and elsewhere and mean different things in various places; "English-only" as a policy in a multi-national corporation is different than "English-only" as a policy in a school district where 80% of the kids are recent immigrants; etc).
Also, I would appreciate it a lot if we could try to play by the rules of the subway. If someone says you've said something hurtful to them and you don't get it after going three rounds over it? Just fucking apologize and move on.
Because honestly? Sure, some people like to make a career out of taking shit personally. But most of the time if someone speaks up to go "wow, this made me really uncomfortable" it's because they're really uncomfortable, not because they want attention. Chances are they want anything but.
So if you wanted them to feel that way? Fine, own it. If you don't give a shit if they feel that way? Fine, own that. If you don't get it? Own that.
But don't tell them how to feel or that they feel too much. And if you feel those emotions are coming from biases, then suggest they examine them, but you can't tell people how to feel, mainly 'cause it doesn't work.
Now, of course, I'm no expert in any of these things. I fight and argue on the Internet where PEOPLE ARE WRONG all the damn time. And I've absolutely, and rightly, been called on for saying racist and ableist shit (I hope it's the sort of thing I keep learning from), and I've been incensed by other people's emotions and engaged in ad hominem attacks and been called on shit that I totally haven't gotten, maybe right or maybe wrongly.
But can we try? Because I try. I'd like it if you fucking tried.
I won't be policing the journal for this shit. I don't have the time, and I'm not interested in being a cop. When I ban people, which is rarely, it's because I've lost my patience and they've made it abundantly clear they do not view me as a human being. So bans: unlikely and at random. Live in fear, or, more rationally, don't worry about it; you're probably safe.
But try not to be assholes, okay?
And a mosque is not a gun is not a car.
Thank you.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 12:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 12:19 am (UTC)I could ask them all to be sure. It might take a while.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 12:20 am (UTC)( Is that more what you were expecting me to say? I do aim to please )
no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 12:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 12:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 12:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 12:49 am (UTC)you also missed the part about how it's my opinion. Instead of accepting that there might be differing opinions, you just attack anything that does not fit your worldview. If this is what you call tolerance, then I think we both don't deserve cookies.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 12:56 am (UTC)I am under no obligation to "agree to disagree" about racism. Or sexism. Or homophobia. And so on. I am not ~intolerant~ because I snarked on the racist shit you said. Snarking you? Is NOTHING LIKE OPPRESSION. Get a fucking grip.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 01:15 am (UTC)I've been oppressed by people like you for ages. This is nothing new. See everyone is entitled to your opinion, and your decision is final as to what my intentions were. All I can possibly do is humble myself before you and ask you how not to be a racist. Your reply is that I can't , I can't ever undo what has been done, and I must pay for it forever. There is no forgiveness. I have been branded a racist for daring to try to understand what motivates real racists. You get the McCarthy medal for this one. Now that you have flamed and shamed me now what will you do? What adventure lays ahead? What lays ahead for the next total stranger you know nothing about that you will brand and condemn? *cue dramatic music*
no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 04:53 pm (UTC)"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
Holy crap dude, she gave you VERY CLEAR INSTRUCTIONS (http://rm.livejournal.com/1905740.html?thread=21606476#t21606476) how to NOT be racist and you've ignored it in favour of clinging to your racist ideas. Either let the ideas go or keep them and people will probably think you are racist, you choose! Can't have it both ways, cupcake!
Maybe you'll learn someday that as a white dude, discussions about racism are NOT ABOUT YOU and are about the people they hurt! You have been acting increasingly ridiculous in this thread, just stop it.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 12:55 am (UTC)I guess that's something I'll have to figure out later. Anywho , back to the me bashing, please. It's always refreshing to be abuses, chastised and have my person torn to shreds by people demanding that abusing and degrading people is wrong.
... wait.. what?
no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 12:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 12:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 12:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 12:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 02:02 am (UTC)The rules are getting confusing. This reminds me of a track by Celestial Navigations, called " The Janitor " which is a comical look at a fictional janitor who works for "God" , cleaning things up lie messy nebulae and stardust. Anyway he gets tasked with making up a game for humans to play , and he comes up with this game in which there was a list of impossible tasks to complete like being a nature loving eco friendly industrialist, and so on. In the end he gives up and says that humans should just be nice to each other. He quips that It's a simple game but no one seems to get it right.
Geoffrey Lewis does most of the voice acting.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 02:14 am (UTC)I am posting this in all sincerity. If you haven't already:
1. Go learn about the concept of aversive racism.
2. Go learn about the use of the phrase "my black friend."
3. Watch this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBJXtTIbDTo
4. Meditate on these things for a while. In silence.
5. Try to let go of the notion that this is calling you out as being a racist and using that as an excuse to dismiss your views. Dude. Seriously. If we were doing that, we all wouldn't still be talking to you. We wouldn't be trying. We wouldn't be making PSA posts or replying to your comments.
6. The answer to your first question is "no."There really isn't any way to ask your friends to vouch for your character like this without coming off as self-centered at best, because really, this conversation? Isn't about you. Not really. It's about a pattern of behavior that you are engaged in, but you're hardly the first or last.
It also prompts a follow-up question: why are you so concerned with conveying I'm Not A Racist! to people on the Internet? For a possible answer, btw, go back to step #1.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 03:07 am (UTC)It's not bloody likely I'm going to just suddenly accept that this is not a calling out, because for the most part that is exactly what is being done. If I say I'm not a racist and people can simply say ' yes you are ' and I am , then I reserve the right to say that this is a calling out, and I'm magically right. I'm being called out for being a racist for trying to understand what the motivations and reasons behind racist activity. The mistake is in thinking I agree with them.
You people have pinned me back against the wall with accusations and insults, and you can't expect much out of a person in that situation.
Why do I care - because people I care about are on this roller coaster of me-hate, and I do not want them to be misguided into thinking ' gee maybe he really IS a racist'.
I allow people on LJ to vouch for the character of others when I hold them in question. They are my friends and I trust and value their judgment and experience where mine is lacking. Maybe that's my bad. Maybe not.
I've been on the receiving end of prejudice and abuse, bias and cultural rejection for most of my life. I know it's wrong. I know it's bad. Now before you start down the path of " Oh you are making it all about you " just try to understand that for a minute. The major difference is that there are no parades for people like me, there are no special interest groups, or protective laws. I have nothing. Now I have even less. Any act of self defense is used to further condemn me. Yay McCarthyisim.
You've snarked at me, I've been called racist, xenophobe, Islam-hating and a host of other things that are not true. when I try to defend myself I'm just told that I'm digging the hole deeper.
I'm not going to admit to being something I'm not. I admitted I used the wrong words and presented my idea poorly, and apologized for it. That was thrown back in my face. You have hurt me, embarrassed me, shamed me, and NOW you take the kinder road and expect me to just roll over and play complacent 'oh I guess I'm a bad man after all' role?
All of you have shamed me into silence. You must understand that by now. the only opinions of yours that I said were wrong were the ones you have formed about me. In contrast any opinion I put out is slapped down as being wrong, for no greater reason than it goes against your opinion.
Does that sound right?
Aside, please don't tell me that I should not feel that way. I do. yo may be able to dictate how I think , and what I believe in , but I know with absolute certainty how I feel. You can't change that.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 03:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 04:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 05:39 am (UTC)I did follow what you advised, even with the mind clearing prior to watching things. It's just that you have me wrong. If I were to hazard a guess I'd say that you were not listening to me, based on 'having seen this before' and pigeonholing me into a place where I fit.
I am not a racist, averse or otherwise.
I am not an anti-Semite.
I am not anti Islam
Nothing you can say or do can change that, nor force me into stating that I am.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 05:47 am (UTC)Go away.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 04:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 04:31 am (UTC)I'm Jewish. I have friends who have made anti-Semitic statements, some even in my hearing. A few even in the strictly anti-Jewish sense. They're still my friends, and in many cases, if I were for some reason asked I would probably say that no, they aren't anti-Semites.
In general, people have been calling your statements anti-Semitic, Islamophobic, or racist. I have not observed anybody calling you any of those things. That distinction really is relevant.
I encourage you to attempt to go back with a clear mind and reread
no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 05:29 am (UTC)My statements, which I have clearly said multiple times that I do not agree with, were part of understanding why some people oppose the location. I do not agree with reasons that are racist/phobic/hate based, and I also clearly said that in my opinion it's a signal to noise ratio issue. Now I also said I don't expect nor demand people to agree with me. In return for this I have been called damn near every bad name under the sun, told that I am a racist , and any attempt to defend that has been twisted into further proof. This is a no win situation, and like the last round - it was shown that people give up when they realize you can't force someone to admit they are something that they are not.
I don't expect you to understand the depth of hurt that is involved when someone who knows better accuses me of being an anti-Semite. You are not me, and no one but I really has a grip on how that cuts.
I don't mind if you interject. Historically speaking you have always been respectful and yet firm on your stance. In contrast to the snarking , name calling and 'oh no you ARE a racist' that is much appreciated.
In conclusion, I made many statements that I have derived as being from the point of view of many people, a point of view that I do not agree with , nor support , but understand. I also feel that misdirected religion is as dangerous as a loaded gun in the sense that it can cause destruction and death at the command of one person. Finally I stated that my opinion is that I disagree with the location of the Mosque, based on signal to noise ratio and effectiveness in completing it's goal of cultural (re)education. This was not based on bias, hate, or any phobia. It was stated that in fact it IS based on these things, which is simply incorrect.
There is a limit to the abuse I will take, especially in this forum which has historically lead to many pieces of hate mail and snark directed towards me. I slipped and started matching snark for snark, which was a mistake on my part, but I'm human and I will make mistakes now and then. It just happens that this round two things happened - one of the attacks I took personally and therefore it hit a nerve, and I had an apology thrown in my face. I don't see any reason to continue down this path. People have demonized me , and there is apparently no changing their mind.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: