Entry tags:
sundries
However, it desperately needed to define its heightened world (dream? ghosts? fantasy? heightened reality?) -- it wasn't that in this regard it needed realism, but it needed consistency. Especially when the step dad got shot -- metaphor, reality, who did it? Yadda yadda.
It also desperately needed to decide its position on the dictators of the past. Because the song Hitler did? Went from funny to creepy to very wise (in fact, had the show stuck with the "I just want to be seen" excuse for conquer and slaughter, I would have been ALL OVER IT) to absolutely terrifying monologue about Jewish. Any of those things I could work with when you have Hitler on stage, but I can't work with all of them without any discernible objective.
In problems that may just be mine -- if you're going to put Alexander the Great on stage he needs to be more than just an extended gay joke that then either does or doesn't connect (I couldn't tell) to the boy becoming his protege. Also, do some fucking research and make it clear you're making choices about it -- Alexander was likely a short, stocky man who was not the beautiful youth he marketed himself as. He can be either in your show, but you need to know what you're choose and why (see: Hitler).
Also, the climatic moment with the mother? Now It's Time For the Moral Lesson of Our Show -- look, it's musical theater. I can't ask you not to be heavy-handed, nor would I want to -- but more elegant would be good.
There were also huge structure issues, that it was clear where they came from (yes, the reveal about Manfred's dad is powerful where you left it, but no longer fits the shape of the rest of the show -- SERVE THE STORY).
Things that were awesome:
- Everything about the Caesar number. The acting, the song, the whole deal.
- Alexander's "I Will Conquer You" song. While it was written to be another extended gay joke in a lot of ways, the actor brought EVERYTHING he had to it, and I actually found it very moving.
- Most of the book. Particularly the scenes with the soldiers on the hill. Well fucking written those. Also, when Manfred is reading his lists. They're exceptionally constructed and eerie, and I wish I could remember them better to tell you about them.
- Most of the performances, even if actors weren't always given enough to do. Again, I'm looking at the soldiers on a hill.
My overall feeling: if this is the quality of stuff at NYMF, D&J is so there. Although do you know what is awesome? Getting out of the theater and having voicemail form my collaborator addressing a thing I was worrying at and making it better.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
no subject
Yay! on the Chilean miners. This is so much earlier than the projected Christmas date. :)
As for the trailer--all the articles I've seen said the line had been pulled from the trailer. Has it been pulled from the actual film?
no subject
And I can sort of muddle through business emails in German, but not much more. Which is tragic, because I WANT TO READ THAT BOOK, since I'm not sure my project is set in the US, and I'd like to think about other locales.
no subject
Hmm... maybe if you just gave the book a try, you could muddle through? If I remember correctly, it uses pretty straightforward language. I once read a Star Trek tie-in novel in French, and that is not a language I was ever fluent in.
Though it's obscenely expensive over there. If you want to try, let me know and I'll pick one up and mail it to you. Or wait--you could probably pick it up while your in Switzerland. Most bookstores could order it by the next day. Or buy it used from Amazon.de (you could use your .com account) and have it mailed to the hotel, or Patty's address... But if all of that seems to complex, just shoot me a PM. :)