![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Not long after, of course, AIDS entered the general public's consciousness. All us twelve-year-old girls talked about how we should all find virgin boys to fuck while something in the world was still safe, and one of the wealthy parents hired the preeminent AIDS researcher at the time to give a lecture for the frightened parents (and here we were, twelve and at a single-sex school) at their townhouse.
And there were, in addition to lessons on how to put a condom on a cucumber, ribbons I did not wear, lest my parents tell me again I was a child, both bad and ineffectual. I remember watching the Oscars and looking at those lapels with such suspicion. All those famous actors, they were bad children too.
I am wearing purple today. It is better to, than not. But no one else seems to be in my moving about the city so far today. I imagine they didn't hear about it. I imagine they don't care about it. I imagine they are like me and not, but certainly, better at defending themselves from shame.
Thank you all SO MUCH. We don't get contact info to send personal thanks until after pledging closes and the project is successful. While we recognize some names as pledges come in, we actually don't always know who people are, so the big personal thank yous will largely be happening elsewhere down the line.
Does that mean no more news links? I doubt it. I'm not that self-disciplined, and I'm grateful that if people aren't seeking out news in other ways, at least they're getting something about how some of the world works here. But, it's not a responsibility I want, nor, increasingly, an obligation I enjoy.
So can we make a deal? I'll spend 5 minutes more a day trying to bring more precision to my links, if you spend 5 minutes more a day exposing yourself to more news that you're not getting from here. Cool?
no subject
Date: 2010-10-20 04:01 pm (UTC)Re: the news articles. I don't view them as a primary news source (although I don't always see them all before you note them), but I enjoy your take on them and the discussion that they sometimes spark in the comments.
The homework could be to post in the comments a few more links to prove that you're not our only news source! :) But that could get out of hand, too. I dunno, I'd think that having them appear in a post called "sundries" makes the point already.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-20 04:04 pm (UTC)But I've run into more than one conversation, both here and in private PMs/emails, where I'm realizing people don't watch or read the news beyond what I'm linking to, which creates a news-hunting and vetting obligation, I simply can't dedicate myself to in a primary way, both because of Hours in the Day and because I am a former investigative reporter, and there's a reason I'm not anymore.
That's because I worked at a wire service in a room broadcasting unexpurgated news feeds (which means the body parts at airplane crash sites and graphic execution footage from repressive regimes). The results of this is that I have a lot of dark humour and a deep, fundamental loyalty to journalists who do the hard, ugly stuff people hate them for. It is a perspective that is largely, rightly, unwelcome; but it is also a perspective I'm entitled to. And we're all better off if those things don't need to come into play here.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-20 04:11 pm (UTC)