sundries, item 0
Nov. 18th, 2010 12:30 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
- You need to deal with this in the way that's best for you. People saying that people should protest and in what ways they should protest isn't fair considering all the intersecting issues involved. People saying "this is one most of protest that's being organized on this day, please considering participating if you can" is a lot more reasonable.
- People talking about protesting by being sexually assaultive towards TSA employees are being assholes. Period.
- If you are considering engaging in inappropriate public nudity in protest, please consider the impact this may have on those around you in line. A lot of people's stuff is getting triggered by the situation, and your actions have a lot of potential repercussions outside of protest.
- Yes, I know protest isn't supposed to be comfortable, but meeting violation with more violation pretty much sucks.
- Yes, I know that an actually effective pat down will feel pretty damn invasive, having had the experience in travel (I think in Europe though) in that last year. HOWEVER, one of the big concerns about the TSA doing it is that these are not trained law enforcement officers who have had thorough background checks. The idea of someone on the sex offender registry who doesn't know what their' doing patting me down? Yeah no.
- Yes, I know the scanners fall somewhere between more dangerous than the TSA is saying and less dangerous than mutant death rays (or, you know, an extra twenty minutes in flight). However, as a frequent traveler with a significant family breast cancer history, if I don't want to go in one of those things, it's my choice to make. And I have fuck all (which is to say NONE WHATSOEVER) patience with people on the Internet who want to tell me I'm wrong to have pause.
- Similarly, I know it may be irrational as someone whose ass has been five feet tall and luminous (Fur: An Imaginary Portrait of Diane Arbus, 2006), but the whole naked picture thingy weirds me out thanks to the recent confirmation that yes, it can see if you're wearing a sanitary napkin or tampon. At the point that you're looking at what's in my cunt and there's not a consented to gynecological examine prison strip search going on, there's a problem.
- There are very few good options in this mess. Information may be the only power you have, because at least it can help you make the right choice for you.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
- What am I doing? Well, I'm in Europe, and I don't know what my opt-out options are. I also know that even for US traveling, I'm going to have to play it by ear. Because both options raise issues for me, and the right choice for me is going to be different on different days.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-17 11:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-17 11:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-17 11:34 pm (UTC)I would guess brown sugar and pecans would be fairly easy but then I know nothing of Cardiff in particular.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-17 11:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2010-11-18 12:03 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2010-11-18 12:04 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2010-11-19 06:41 pm (UTC) - Expandno subject
Date: 2010-11-17 11:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-17 11:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-17 11:43 pm (UTC)Man, I miss Soul Coughing.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-17 11:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-17 11:48 pm (UTC)Yes, thank you. I went through one of those scanners while I was travelling this summer, and it skeeves me the hell out when I think about it too hard. But given that that even non-'enhanced' pat downs are triggering for me, there isn't another option. Huge respect for
no subject
Date: 2010-11-17 11:49 pm (UTC)Well, canned pumpkin might be hard since pumpkin pie isn't a dessert there, it's in savory things like soups. Waitrose has a Thanksgiving section online but I'm not sure about the stores and you'll be in transit, so...
Some ideas for traditional goodies/substitutions here:
http://community.livejournal.com/brits_americans/1561074.html
I've been abroad for several Thanksgivings, and I waver between OMG DUPLICATING EVERYTHING, substituting for something sort of similar but regional and autumnal or saying fuckit, eating lasagne and making Thanksgiving dinner in January or something.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-17 11:54 pm (UTC)Caught the plane, though.
ETA: If these things can see tampons, what if you're wearing a menstrual cup? Those aren't well-known--what if the security people think you're hiding something down there? *worries* I don't want a cavity search...
no subject
Date: 2010-11-18 12:16 am (UTC)Which just points out how stupid this all is as, if what it takes to get a weapon on a plane is secreting it in your crotch or your mouth, and you want very badly to bring down said plane, secrete you will. And yet no one's argued the "pat down" should include a cavity search.
Yet.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-17 11:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-17 11:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-18 12:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-18 12:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-18 12:03 am (UTC)Thanks for the link to
no subject
Date: 2010-11-18 12:03 am (UTC)There's no question you can get brown sugar in the UK. If you wanted to go with a UK twist you could pick up white sugar and black treacle and mix the two. :-)
[The UK is easier for finding molasses-based products. In Australia it's near-impossible to find molasses.]
Hope that helps!
no subject
Date: 2010-11-18 12:04 am (UTC)So it's finally really the 21st Century?
no subject
Date: 2010-11-18 12:16 am (UTC)You'll want to double-check this, but I believe in the UK you do not have the option to opt out. I'm not sure how widespread the scanners are there, though. (The news always makes it sound like all airports have them, but I didn't see one in March in Manchester, for whatever that's worth.) There were some leaked images on Gizmodo that suggest the person viewing the body scans sees an image of the clothed person simultaneously, which makes that option feel less safe from a "perceived gender may not match genitals" point of view than it would if they only saw your nude outline. I'm honestly not sure what happens if they send the right/wrong person to grope you (from your perspective or theirs). I'd read things suggesting this might not be a problem, but that was before their fascination with touching genitals. To be honest, I think I'll end up in tears either way and they'll feel worse about it if their touching me made me cry, so I might stand on principle, fuck with my head a bit more and find a girly shirt and the purse of disguise.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-18 12:25 am (UTC)Neither of us have flown out of T4 at Heathrow recently, and his most recent experience of Gatwick was about four, five months ago recently, but we've not hit the imaging scanners at all yet, so the opt-out/no-opt-out is a bit moot for us so far.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-18 08:47 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-18 12:29 am (UTC)Be aware that things will be measured in non-American amounts. Conversion or substitution gets awkward sometimes.
Sweet potatoes existed; for the love of heaven, do NOT use British marshmallows for any topping. I'm against marshmallow topping anyway, but Brit marshmallows are inexplicably often pink, and it's just hideous.
I often had to sub or add molasses to raw or white sugar to get that brown sugar flavor.
Pumpkin was at the time nearly unavailable, but I understand that like in the US it's had a resurgence among trendy savory foods, so look for canned in better shops. (I loathe pumpkin and usually made apple instead unless asked.)
Ham should be available, not sure about that particular cut or size, but something ought to be findable; they like hams for Christmas, so there should be lots around. Might end up using a small boneless ham quarter or the like as a substititute for the ham steak.
Pecans, sure; pine nuts, not sure. (My family regarded those as food for animals, not people.)
That data is fifteen years old and from London and Cambridge, and leaving out Harrods as mentioned.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-18 12:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-18 12:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-18 12:51 am (UTC)Now as far as Item Two goes: If I am being frank, I saw that comment and its response made me uncomfortable and angry. I can talk about it more if you'd like, but I don't want to set off anyone who might erroneously think it would be a good thing to police how I talked or felt about my body.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-18 12:58 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-18 02:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-18 08:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-18 10:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-18 11:14 am (UTC)In general the larger the supermarket the more selection of "obscure" items there will be, but you might need to try more than one to find some things. Whole chicken is a common item (fresh or frozen, free range, organic... lots of kinds of chicken) in supermarkets. I'm not sure what you mean by "ham steak" although you may mean what we call "gammon" which you can get in 'steak' form. Brown sugar probably lives with baking ingredients, and it's reasonably common here in several forms; various kinds of nut might be hard to find but probably exist in large supermarkets, you may end up paying "snacky health food" prices rather than "cooking ingredient" prices :-(
no subject
Date: 2010-11-18 04:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-18 06:58 pm (UTC)Thank you for saying this. While I'm ambivalent about loving it per se, I own my size. I use language for myself ("fat," "chunky," "chunk-style," etc.) that I might not use to describe others unless I'm sufficiently intimate with them on a social basis to know whether or not they're good with it. Me, I am. I know how big I am. Am I the biggest guy I know? No. But I'm not small on any axis, and I'm more or less aware of it, and part of rocking it hard is to be able to own it without apology.
As for the TSA, I think something that needs to get brought into this conversation is the difference between TSA the Entity and TSA workers as Human Beings. That's significant. (Also that responding to abuse with more abuse is stupid, but hey.)
Oh, and I saw a great recipe for babies on this canning blog the other day...