![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
- If you're Jewish, you probably know what blood libel is
- if you're not Jewish, you have a better than even chance of not knowing
- Anecdata (my favorite made-up word ever) suggests that if you are from the US, not Jewish and not a medieval history scholar or hobbiest, your likelihood of knowing the term "blood libel" pre-Sarah Palin drops to around 35%.
- Anecdata also suggests to me, and I wish the polling tool on LJ was better so that I could actually do this and run the numbers for real, that people who were raised more religiously, REGARDLESS OF FAITH, are more likely to be familiar with the "blood libel" term.
- General poll problems include self-selecting respondents, comparatively low numbers of Jewish respondents, and the ways in which LJ response samples don't necessarily reflect the general population in terms of age, income and gender. In general, my gut tells me that a similar poll done on a general-population sample would show an even lower awareness of the meaning of "blood libel" among non-Jewish folks.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-13 04:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-13 04:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-13 06:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-13 06:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-13 08:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-13 04:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-13 07:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-13 05:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-13 05:44 pm (UTC)I'm trying to keep my distress regarding my own political climate low, but yesterday I had a rude awakening with friends of mine and I feel pretty helpless (what with needing to be gentle, 'cause I'm a bleeding-heart queer) and damn, it feels good to know my situation is not special!
no subject
Date: 2011-01-13 05:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-13 05:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-13 06:41 pm (UTC)Unfortunately, I'm not sure that an answer exists.
I see people behaving all sorts of ways, and no excellent method of telling what outcomes are most likely.
Considering that you're not that likely to pull the overall situation very far in any direction (you're a good writer with a larger than average audience, but you're hardly the only one), I don't think it would be irresponsible to experiment with showing more anger and finding out what you think of the results, both for yourself and for other people.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 04:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-13 06:25 pm (UTC)I feel that this would sound much better if there was a period after "human" and that was it. "love this country" is an unnecessary assumption/condition, "and be civil" is a non-sequitur.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-13 06:25 pm (UTC)Just commenting to say that I totally hear you on this, even though my background is different.
A few years ago I had a job in an arts center at a local branch of a state university. For a while we had an artist do an anti-Iraq war installation, and one morning the director told me that their was already at least one complaint.
From there on out, I started to bring pepper spray to work.
Overreaction? Not when stuff like this has happened at other places showing art on the subject... (I don't know the official protocols for deeming something triggery, but the article does describe an assault.)
Attacked for art, S.F. gallery closes (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/05/30/GALLERY.TMP)
If someone was going to take a swing at me, I wasn't going to fold. I would not start the fight, but I would finish it.
At the time, I was living with my folks, and did tell my Mom about my worries and my purchase of pepper spray. At one point in a family conversation, she mentioned the pepper spray and why I bought it, and all of a sudden, I am being told by my that I was overreacting and being paranoid.
Le Sigh.
The real kicker is that back when Martin Luther King Jr. birthday was being made a holiday, someone made a late night death threat call to my family's home, due to the fact that we had the same last name as a then member of Congress. Dad called the cops.
So he can protect himself, and I am cannon fodder?
I truly don't know how to unpack that. I get told that I am loved, but then scolded for wanting to be safe, being assertive and not hiding my anger when being treated badly, and taking steps to protect myself. One protects things that have value, and I am not being protected, nor allowed protect myself.
Am I dense or getting my head messed with?
no subject
Date: 2011-01-13 07:39 pm (UTC)Your poll was very enlightening as to how much of an outlier I am. (No religious education, either!)
no subject
Date: 2011-01-13 08:50 pm (UTC)Not necessarily for the current question, but in case you ever have a question about which you'd like to be able to analyze responses.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-13 09:59 pm (UTC)This. So much This.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-13 10:13 pm (UTC)I was very surprised that I hadn't come across the term before, because I DID know the history associated with it -- the way that Jewish people have been blamed for Jesus' death, and that Jewish people were accused of eating babies in order to justify medieval massacres, etc -- it was just the term itself that I hadn't come across.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-13 10:15 pm (UTC)OMG, that is... if it's done in an aware way, could be brilliant. If it's not, it's going to be very, very ugly.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-13 10:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 04:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 06:04 am (UTC)Link here: http://anomilygrace.livejournal.com/524227.html?style=mine