This is significant, and for more than the obvious reason. The Obama administration has taken the position until now that it will uphold policies of past administrations *unless* there's a constitutional reason not to do so. This tells me Eric Holder has concluded there's a constitutional basis for considering DOMA indefensible. (Probably an Equal Protection thing.)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Though this is only about DOMA Sec 3 AFAICT. That isn't everything, but it's a big thing.)
no subject
no subject
no subject
It's good, mind you, but limited.
no subject
no subject
Heh. Part of my brain is saying "Obama should ask for it to stop being defended as a cost-cutting measure."
Whatever the reason, it's a good start.
no subject