![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
This will not, of course, by my paper, which is in progress, but will be a lot of discussion about the thesis on which I'm basing my paper and some of my preliminary conclusions, as well as whatever awesome contributions others on panel and in the audience bring to it.
Anyway, more as I know it. If you're gonna be at Gally, please come.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I've never written a Regency AU, but wow,
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
Anyway, examining the Regency AU, and the oddities of it, and how to reconcile them or not with the historical and later literary source is really interesting stuff, especially in the context of a lot of the issues fandom is grappling with lately. I think it also speaks, tangentally to a lot of the post-CoE discussion about the use of homophobia in the narrative regarding Ianto. As writers, can we show biases without enacting bias? Is it better to remove non-narratively central hate from stories or keep it in for "realism"? What do we do when the audience doesn't get it? How do we as writers do it so the audience does get it? Are these even in the right questions? Etc.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)