(no subject)
Massive number of links on my friends list this morning on voter fraud, and the fact that pretty much 3% of votes in every presidential election are uncountable for any given reason.
This is bad. Really really bad. And if the story gains momentum and makes it to the mainstream press, I can't even imagine.... I mean this shell shocked misery is one thing, but what if the exit polls weren't wrong?
You know, if our national ATM network works, why the hell can't we figure out how to have every vote counted, accurately and fairly?
I'll put the list of links together tonight, but here's this for now: http://www.livejournal.com/users/womzilla/102943.html?#cutid1
This is bad. Really really bad. And if the story gains momentum and makes it to the mainstream press, I can't even imagine.... I mean this shell shocked misery is one thing, but what if the exit polls weren't wrong?
You know, if our national ATM network works, why the hell can't we figure out how to have every vote counted, accurately and fairly?
I'll put the list of links together tonight, but here's this for now: http://www.livejournal.com/users/womzilla/102943.html?#cutid1

no subject
It is either a typo or very very scary.
I am very mistrustful of the electronic voting machines, the company is not very good at security and the fact that discrepancies have been found in a lot of less important elections using them is starting to bother me. In other countries that use the same machines from the same suppliers they also print off a paper confirmation ballot that is then put in the ballot box, the electronic count is used but if there are questions the paper ballots are recounted.
This is what was advised in Fla and Ohio but was not done. Don't know why not. As it is blackboxvoting.org are requesting copies of all system, voting and audit logs from the machines under the freedom of information act. But this could take us to christmas to figure out.
no subject
no subject
If some kind of error ( either tampering, fraud, human error , or otherwise ) is discovered and the actual results differ from what we have been told, it will be interesting to see who goes along with it and who plays the ' for the better of the country ' card.
IMHO, if the results favor Kerry, but it's all brushed over ' for the good of the country ' , I think we will see something that will make the ' Florida fiasco ' look like a 8th grade dodgeball contest on a Saturday night.
no subject
no subject
As far as the EC goes, Do you think we will see some no faith[1] votes or will they all vote in line with the popular ?
[1] I think that's what it's called, when the EC represenatitive votes against the popular vote.
no subject
no subject
Tnx.
no subject
no subject
No paper trail, no audits, a huge difference from the exit polling and the incumbants Brother in charge.
Not good
no subject
Now that you mention it ...
From a geek point of view, that would be an interesting network to use to pass electronic vote information. Not the 1st tier though - as most ATMs now report in via phone lines, but between the central reporting areas and the banks. Hmm... That could be interesting.
no subject
no subject
sadly almost anyone with a good understanding of the problems involved in electronic voting has said.. don't do it, use paper and pencil instead it's more accountable.
a typical informed review of diebold's stuff here (http://avirubin.com/vote/response.html), the main media of course gloss over these things as too tricky for people to understand (quite possibly including the journalists) and so it has all become a case of "pay no attention to the man behind the curtain".
at best the e-voting is just poorly implemented, at worst... well bush always said it would be easier being a dictator.
no subject
A-MEN. We have Coke machines that are smarter and easier to figure out that our ballot process. But then I've also seen a few people who couldn't figure out a Coke machine, too...but I doubt it would hit the 3% mark!
no subject