I believe that by starting with the vague assertion at the end, you have followed the wrong chain of inferences. You should have started with the byline at the beginning, and used this column as further proof that Maureen Dowd's writing is trivial.
(Maureen Dowd is, I presume, a woman, but as far as I can tell, that fact is incidental to her triviality.)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2004-12-02 01:01 pm (UTC)(Maureen Dowd is, I presume, a woman, but as far as I can tell, that fact is incidental to her triviality.)