[personal profile] rm
I am so not near cogent enough to really write about this right now.

However.

Dude. Did I really expect to spend huge chunks of this film thinking about Daniel Craig's balls? Did I expect everyone else in the tehater to be thinking it along with me? No. No I didn't. But yes, this is what I can say about the new Bond movie. This observation brought to you by myself, [livejournal.com profile] kalichan and [livejournal.com profile] hofnarr. They never post, so I have to do the dirty work.

Also, OMG, Tobias Menzies -- for like a second and a half, but I adore him. Fic in the offing.

also, why didn't someone warn me about ALL THE EYE THINGS. UGH.

_and_ on the way home, my bus driver got busted for drunk driving.

thinking about his balls?

Date: 2006-11-27 05:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] haya.livejournal.com
I haven't seen it yet, but WHAT?

Re: thinking about his balls?

Date: 2006-11-27 05:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rm.livejournal.com
Among other things -- torture scene. Very specific torture scene.

Re: thinking about his balls?

Date: 2006-11-27 10:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] heron61.livejournal.com
Which I found to be an interesting counterpoint to the whole male-power-fantasy angle of the film. I didn't like what happened after that scene, but the scene was part of an interesting (if imperfect) deconstruction of the genre that was part of what made the film (to me at least) quite good. All the eye things were however simply gross.

Date: 2006-11-27 05:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] feyandstrange.livejournal.com
I just saw it this afternoon, and noted that myself. Dude. I never really needed the phrase "James Bond's itchy balls" to cross my thoughts.

And yeah, the eye thing was kind of gross.

Re: thinking about his balls?

Date: 2006-11-27 06:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rezendi.livejournal.com
Oddly, that torture scene (and Vesper's name) was about the only thing in CASINO ROYALE taken fairly faithfully from the book.

Re: thinking about his balls?

Date: 2006-11-27 08:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] feyandstrange.livejournal.com
I hadn't read it in ages (and made a point not to before the movie), but it did seem familiar. Thanks for confirming; I don't have Flemings lying around the house and would've forgotten to look it up elsewhere. People have been saying this was 'very true to the books', but aside from that scene I wasn't seeing it.

Re: thinking about his balls?

Date: 2006-11-28 04:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coyotegoth.livejournal.com
I think that's more a matter of general tone (plus the fact that not enough people read Fleming these days), rather than specifics of plot. I could be wrong, though; haven't reread CR in *coughmumble* years.

Date: 2006-11-27 10:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] heron61.livejournal.com
I just saw it this afternoon, and noted that myself. Dude. I never really needed the phrase "James Bond's itchy balls" to cross my thoughts.

Now I'm imagining that phrase as some sort of astoundingly pulpy epithet: "By James Bond's itchy balls!!!" Or, maybe not...

Date: 2006-11-27 06:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tsarina.livejournal.com
That scene made me cringe.

Did your bus driver get arrested?

Date: 2006-11-27 03:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rm.livejournal.com
Yes. For driving with an open Heinekin! The best was when other random bus passenger says, "the MTA don't play that."

Date: 2006-11-27 07:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tsarina.livejournal.com
Bwahahaha. That is so terrifying!

Date: 2006-11-27 12:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crazycatlady.livejournal.com
I, as you know, don't have balls, but when I was watching that particular scene, my non-existent ones were singing with pain.

Date: 2006-11-27 01:09 pm (UTC)
melebeth: (Default)
From: [personal profile] melebeth
There are eye things? Thank you for telling me. This, along with my basic inability to stay awake through Bond films, overwhelms my interest in going to see this. I do love Dame Judie, and new Bond is awfully pretty, but... no. You are queen of useful warnings, and I send you gluten free electronic cookies.

Date: 2006-11-27 02:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rm.livejournal.com
hahaha. I am severely eye-phobic and this was very hard to take.

Date: 2006-11-28 12:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mizg.livejournal.com
I'm never clear on your level of fondness for Jane Austen, BUT. They are making a new Persuasion, due out next year, and it has some cool castings. I point you there specifically because you mentioned Tobias Menzies, who will, I notice, be playing William Elliot (Mr. Elliot, as opposed to Sir Walter Elliot). There's actually quite a bit of interesting casting, take a look: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0844330/

See you Sunday?

Date: 2006-11-28 04:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rm.livejournal.com
I like Jane Austen, but it's not the reason I'm into teh period. However, I have this weird, irrational fondness for tobias Menzies, so I'll totally go see the new Persuasion just on those grounds alone. And, of course, the hope of good costuming.

February 2021

S M T W T F S
 123456
789 10111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 17th, 2026 09:47 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios