LJ's definition of hate speech
Nov. 30th, 2007 11:27 pmhttp://community.livejournal.com/lj_biz/243946.html?thread=16203242#t16203242
"I must express my deepest concerns that your definition of "hate speech" (as presented on the page that appears when one attempts to flag material as such) does NOT include hateful, violence-encouraging content directed against people based on their sexual orientation or gender identity."
no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 04:42 am (UTC)WELL-PLAYED.
I'm just... I can't even be upset anymore. We'll see if they manage to break me again.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 05:02 am (UTC)What's it gonna take for these idiots to hire a good lawyer to write some boilerplate for them?
no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 06:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 06:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 07:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 08:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 02:12 pm (UTC)I'm just guessing, but it's the only explanation my mind can make for their total and complete cluelessness. If it wouldn't be considered hate speech, I'd suggest that it's scary for fundamentalists to run things, which makes me want to scream at the world, "Beware of Mike Huckabee! You don't want him running the freaking country." Sorry /tangent.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-04 01:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-04 07:00 am (UTC)Who knows?