steampunk in the NY Times
May. 8th, 2008 08:51 amhttp://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/08/fashion/08PUNK.html
On the one hand, I always groan when the New York Times covers any cultural phenomenon I have any connection with. On the other, this may be a good sign for more structured clothing in the fall season and they do get props for actually finding diverse folks to photograph for a change.
On the one hand, I always groan when the New York Times covers any cultural phenomenon I have any connection with. On the other, this may be a good sign for more structured clothing in the fall season and they do get props for actually finding diverse folks to photograph for a change.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-08 01:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-08 01:48 pm (UTC)One of the things I love best about the aesthetic is that I've never seen anyone *not* pull it off.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-08 03:27 pm (UTC)Also, it seems that steampunk fashion caters to...the vertically inclined, I guess you'd say? I've learned to bow out of the quest for fashionable and/or elegant clothing, as it's virtually impossible to find anything that properly fits me, outside of sweaters, peasant blouses and jeans. (I'm 5'4", broad backed, stocky and, er, "well endowed" for my height, apparently.) For years now, I've used "hobbit" to describe my appearance, and as we all know, there
is no crying in baseballare no hobbits in steampunk.That said, if you need someone to carry a doomsday device over ridiculously long distances on foot in order to dispose of it in a sparsely populated waste land, you know who to ask.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-08 03:33 pm (UTC)I think you're gorgeous, and you'd make a dashing steampunk.
Also, to your hobbit point, I'm 5' tall, and crappy knees and feet make it mostly impossible to comfortably wear heels. Ditto the "endowments." (I've cosplayed as Power Girl!)
Don't sell yourself...ahem...short, but above all else, be comfortable in your costuming.
(Edited for properly demonstrative icon.)
no subject
Date: 2008-05-08 07:29 pm (UTC)That made my day, seriously. Unsolicited compliments from strangers make me smile. :)
Also, good to know I'm not the only one who has problems with heels. I do ok as long as said heel is thick/chunky/wide, but otherwise, I wobble like a tipsy schoolmarm.
See, now you've got me wondering what kind of costumes I could get away with. Hmm...
no subject
Date: 2008-05-08 07:33 pm (UTC)Stompy boots help, too!
And omg, heels wtf. I pronate, so all heels MUST be chunky or else I'm in pain a half hour later.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-08 05:26 pm (UTC)I am jealous of your ability to find jeans, matter of fact. I have a 35 inch inseam and no waist. If you'd like to talk about someone who can't wear Victorian garb, you can start with me. (But it srsly wouldn't stop me if I really wanted to do it. I've looked more ridiculous before and I probably will again. :))
no subject
Date: 2008-05-08 06:16 pm (UTC)I will have to take a closer look at Victorian fashions, as most of the photos I've seen appear sleek in the torso. Unfortunately, that's where I tend to accumulate most of my weight - breezy, flowing clothes obscures that. I haven't tucked in a shirt for years for that very reason.
Still, steampunk appeals to me on many levels. People in the article mentioned romanticism, a sense of dignity, the intersection of technology and ethical decisions...that and so much more about the movement fascinates me. Especially the music - I don't know if these bands would qualify, but I'm intrigued by groups like the Two Man Gentlemen Band and 16 Horsepower who put their own spin on Americana.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-08 08:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-08 10:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-09 06:57 am (UTC)