Do you run an LJ community that has been or could be directly affected by unclear TOS on freedom of speech issues (think: political, religious, abuse survivors, creative, academic, fannish, queer, kink, poly, adult lifestyle)?
Do you run an LJ community that has been or could be affected by sloppy attempts on LJ/SUPs part to massage LJ's image (think: mental health/illness, abuse survivors, fannish, queer, kink, poly, adult lifestyle)?
Do you run an LJ community whose users have accessibility issues with the site (those with vision impairments, etc.)?
Do you run a community on any topic whatsoever whose users would be interested in discussion the LJ Advisory Board elections?
If so, I'd like the opportunity to hear the concerns of your users and talk a bit about where I stand on those issues. I promise to make only a single post to talk about the election (unless invited to do otherwise) and my candidacy and not spam the community or its users in any way.
If you'd be willing to let me post in those communities please let me know here or email me at racheline @ gmail dot com. If you're not a community maintainer, but have ties to a community maintainer and want to broach this issue with them, I'd appreciate it.
Do you run an LJ community that has been or could be affected by sloppy attempts on LJ/SUPs part to massage LJ's image (think: mental health/illness, abuse survivors, fannish, queer, kink, poly, adult lifestyle)?
Do you run an LJ community whose users have accessibility issues with the site (those with vision impairments, etc.)?
Do you run a community on any topic whatsoever whose users would be interested in discussion the LJ Advisory Board elections?
If so, I'd like the opportunity to hear the concerns of your users and talk a bit about where I stand on those issues. I promise to make only a single post to talk about the election (unless invited to do otherwise) and my candidacy and not spam the community or its users in any way.
If you'd be willing to let me post in those communities please let me know here or email me at racheline @ gmail dot com. If you're not a community maintainer, but have ties to a community maintainer and want to broach this issue with them, I'd appreciate it.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-09 04:41 pm (UTC)Sometime around when LJ cracked down on fandom, they also quietly wiped out most military schools, as well as some journals of members currently involved in the conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq.
I've been a little baffled why even in the midst of the the fandom issues, LJ would leave "Starfleet Academy" and "Hogwarts", and "Miskatonic University" (which are great for fan communities to embrace), yet actual training like "Infantry School" and "Airborne School" (both of which actually exist) are now gone and unable to be re-added. Personally, I met close friends at both of those places, learned more than a few valuable lessons, and probably still carry a little scar tissue from my times there.
Additionally, when some of the soldier's journals disappeared, it's impossible to tell the reason. Did the government demand they be pulled for security/censorship issues? Did someone flag them because they disagreed with the political issues? Or were these journals actually deleted by the members for their own privacy? (In at least one case, I'd really like to know if that person is alive or dead.) If LJ is going to wipe out a journal, it would be nice to at least have a vague inclination as to why.
Since then, many members of that community have simply taken to blogging elsewhere.
Thanks,
-Christopher-Ian
no subject
Date: 2008-05-09 04:44 pm (UTC)Thank you for the information. I'm really pretty heartbroken by it, and I don't have anything resembling the personal connection to the issue you do.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-09 06:46 pm (UTC)Didn't know that, either.
Thank you for posting, and - this is horrible. I'm sorry.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-09 05:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-09 05:22 pm (UTC)Awesome....
no subject
Date: 2008-05-09 05:31 pm (UTC)If you want I can make the Green Room post a specific "LJ issues" one either this weekend or Monday. Whichever works better for you.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-05-09 10:51 pm (UTC)I strongly believe each community within LJ has the right to establish its own standards for topics and style of discourse, while also supporting the right of users to form the broadest array of communities.
The beauty of LJ is that is provides a platform for users to create communities tailored to their needs. I support LJ/SUP not curtailing the use of that platform; that does not mean I think all communities should be obligated to allow posts they find off-topic or inappropriate to their concerns.
That is why I am asking permission before campaigning on any LJ community.
As to the specific incident in question, I did not found that community, nor am I a maintainer of it. I support its vision for LJ and I'm happy to have their endorsement.
My campaign is my campaign.
Finally, I was getting a blessed bit of sleep when whatever occurred and occurred, so my details on it are fairly limited, but I do not view it as an LJ policy issue.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-05-09 10:56 pm (UTC)Ban/Block
Date: 2008-05-09 11:08 pm (UTC)If you don't shut them up, they'll bury you in dogshit.
~M~
Re: Ban/Block
Date: 2008-05-09 11:18 pm (UTC)Free Speech - But Only If You Say What We Want To Hear.
Gotta love it!
Re: Ban/Block
From:Re: Ban/Block
From:Re: Ban/Block
From:Re: Ban/Block
From:Re: Ban/Block
From:Re: Ban/Block
From:Re: Ban/Block
From:Re: Ban/Block
From:Re: Ban/Block
From:Re: Ban/Block
From:Re: Ban/Block
From:Re: Ban/Block
From:Re: Ban/Block
From:Re: Ban/Block
From:Re: Ban/Block
From:Re: Ban/Block
From:Re: Ban/Block
From:Re: Ban/Block
From:Re: Ban/Block
From:Re: Ban/Block
From:Re: Ban/Block
From:Re: Ban/Block
From:Re: Ban/Block
From:Re: Ban/Block
From:Re: Ban/Block
From:Re: Ban/Block
From:Re: Ban/Block
From:Re: Ban/Block
From:Re: Ban/Block
Date: 2008-05-12 04:33 pm (UTC)Re: Ban/Block
From:Re: Ban/Block
From:some how relate
From:Re: some how relate
From:Re: some how relate
From:Butthurtz Fo Reel
From:Re: Butthurtz Fo Reel
From:Re: Butthurtz Fo Reel
From:Re: Butthurtz Fo Reel
From:Re: Butthurtz Fo Reel
From:no subject
Date: 2008-05-09 11:15 pm (UTC)For further questions/comments please contact Jameth's PR Managers,
no subject
Date: 2008-05-09 11:40 pm (UTC)~M~
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-05-09 11:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:clearly brazen acts of verbal terrorism.
From:(frozen) no subject
Date: 2008-05-10 02:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-09 11:29 pm (UTC)~M~
This shit is only going to get worse.
Date: 2008-09-24 12:23 pm (UTC)~M~
no subject
Date: 2008-05-10 12:28 am (UTC)Have you thought about contacting each other (RM and JAMETH) and calling a cease fire until post-nominations? Then somone can set up a community for THE GREAT DEBATE! Where All the wank can be conveniently kept in one place!
Dramacrats vs. RMpublicans. The Battle South of Seattle! The Royale with cheese!
x-posted to the other candidate's journal.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-10 02:12 am (UTC)Still. It's a good, logical idea, and I hope that the candidates' supporters are willing to accept the same cease fire. Because, really, very little of what's been posted above is relevant, warranted, or useful to the issue at hand.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-10 03:04 am (UTC)http://community.livejournal.com/lj_election_en/8419.html?thread=345827#t345827
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-05-10 02:53 am (UTC)Debates would be nice though. We'll see what happens.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-05-14 05:48 pm (UTC) - Expandno subject
Date: 2008-05-15 09:26 pm (UTC)In the interest of fairness and full disclosure, should any of the other candidates seek my permission to do the same, I shall feel obligated to grant it, as long as they follow the same rules.
Catherine