from the DVD extras
Sep. 26th, 2008 09:53 amSo Kali and I are talking about various Torchwood continuity problems and how they make Jack (especially in light of stunts Ianto, John Hart and Gwen pull at various points) look like the crappiest conman EVER.
To which I contribute --
Ianto: You are a terrible conman.
Jack: But I have a very nice cock.
Ianto: Is that why you slept through conman class?
Jack: Sorta. Yeah.
That we somehow get actual creative work done while I spend my time being this sort of idiot (pretty much every email I send her has bullshit like this in it) is astounding.
To which I contribute --
Ianto: You are a terrible conman.
Jack: But I have a very nice cock.
Ianto: Is that why you slept through conman class?
Jack: Sorta. Yeah.
That we somehow get actual creative work done while I spend my time being this sort of idiot (pretty much every email I send her has bullshit like this in it) is astounding.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 02:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 02:20 pm (UTC)Especially to the "Sorta. Yeah."
It is a bit of a mystery how Jack - who should, in fanon-world, at least, be excellent at reading body language - misses so many vital cues. Though I think he was (a) willfully blind (with the Cyberwoman), (b) too trusting (Adrift), (c) letting people make their own mistakes (Tosh in GBG - it was, of course, really clear there he did suss what was going on) and as for John Hart - I don't know. Some combinaiton of nostalgia and 'he's gonna screw me so lets help him and see how' attitude?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 02:24 pm (UTC)GBG creates different continuity/universe building concerns, mostly with regard to psychic training and the like. We're trying to address that in our CERN fluff, oddly enough.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 02:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 02:46 pm (UTC)That's sort of all you really need to know. Other than the thought of Jack, Gwen and Ianto flying coach to Switzerland.
But it's cute, worth a listen.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 02:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 07:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 07:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 02:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 03:02 pm (UTC)It really is true. I think Jack's conman skills are less about the big plotty cons and more about the "I'm so dashing and charming, I will distract you while I steal your cutlery" cons.
Also, I kind of suspect that cloak and dagger work really isn't in his true nature. He can do it, but he's always read as more of an extrovert. Doesn't mean he hasn't got secrets, or that he's learned to cloister off, but he gets his energy from people.
Oh, Jack. You big dumb lump.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 03:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 03:11 pm (UTC)That's one reason why I want him to meet X-Files' Krycek somewhere, someday, in someone's fic universe. Krycek and Jack at their bastards' best and still so so different.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 03:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 03:44 pm (UTC)It's not like you're alone there ;-)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 05:18 pm (UTC)I suspect this kind of silliness actually contributes to getting creative work done. It's practically research.
(How does my dad know all about about cons?)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 05:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 06:48 pm (UTC)Actually, I can see Jack being pulled into the con thing by John. I think the big, high-stakes cons and long, complicated games are totally John's thing, and Jack would be very handy as either the front man, the backup muscle or both. John's kind of con is not what Jack does best. Jack's style is the short and sweet, straight-forward con that relies on his charm and looks (and nice cock) to hook the mark and pull it off.