gay rights stuff
May. 24th, 2009 02:33 pmMore baby steps forward that highlight our barbarism:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/05/24/gay.diplomats.benefits/index.html
How is this shit even a question?
Meanwhile, common sense from the Church of Scotland:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/05/24/scotland.church.gay.minister/index.html
Finally, California, Tuesday....
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/05/24/gay.diplomats.benefits/index.html
How is this shit even a question?
Meanwhile, common sense from the Church of Scotland:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/05/24/scotland.church.gay.minister/index.html
Finally, California, Tuesday....
no subject
Date: 2009-05-24 07:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-24 07:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-24 07:46 pm (UTC)I'm terrified.
And either way, it will make the bigots more active.
And I'm not ready yet.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-24 07:48 pm (UTC)Note to self: buy some almond-stuffed queen olives.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-24 07:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-24 07:56 pm (UTC)Drinks designed for emergencies must be planned carefully.
(Speaking of plans, I will also need to make ice...)
no subject
Date: 2009-05-24 07:51 pm (UTC)You're not alone in this.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-24 09:30 pm (UTC)I feel like whatever happens there it will become the emblem of momentum for one side or the other.
As witness the Google ads at the end of that first CNN article: "Act to End Traditional Marriage" and "Is Same-Sex Marriage a Sin?" were the headlines on two of them.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-25 03:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-24 08:42 pm (UTC)OTOH, yay for the C of S, and hopefully the State Dept. will go through with that policy change. *crosses fingers for all*
no subject
Date: 2009-05-24 09:18 pm (UTC)Fingers crossed for California.
I keep hoping that I will wake up one day and the stupid will be over. All people being allowed to be people, equality for *all*, blah blah blah...
no subject
Date: 2009-05-24 10:12 pm (UTC)Despite my impending divorce, I am not soured on gay marriage. 3rd time is the charm ;-)
no subject
Date: 2009-05-24 10:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-25 02:43 am (UTC)Canada's constitution forbids it under an 'equal protection' thingy.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-25 08:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-25 09:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-25 02:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-25 08:25 am (UTC)Still pretty horrid, though.
no subject
no subject
Date: 2009-05-25 08:22 am (UTC)I've known a number of people who got married specifically in order to get the benefits for their spouses, which doesn't bother me that much when the choice is available.
But denying benefits to unmarried couples *and* denying them the right to marry.... um, yeah, I think 'barbarous' is the correct word.