see, it's like this

[rm]

yuki_onna has a great post about why it's perfectly easy to boycott books of people who say appalling bigoted stuff on the Internet.

It is not, as so many people seem to think, some dogmatic decision to only engage with people who think exactly like me. Rather, life is short, books cost money, and when it comes down to deciding what I want to read -- allowing for a few cases of staggering genius that actually makes these decisions complex -- I'm not going to read stuff by people who are hateful, threatening and rude to me and mine, online or off.

Comments

[xtricks.livejournal.com]

Yeah, it's much more acceptable to do that sort of stuff for racism issues and (sometimes) for more overt forms of sexism but I wouldn't participate in a campaign to boycott the distributor/publishing co either. I'd take it directly to the author. It makes me significantly more uncomfortable to do that when it's about racism etc (because, as you mentioned, homophobia is more acceptable) but I *think* that's where my intentions lie.

The caveat being that works with book writers (more or less) but not so much with many other forms of media (where the writers are only one of a large team) and so TV shows and movies need pressure on the companies that 'own' the product. Though I still think voting with one's feet is important since networks do look at viewing numbers - part of the reason why I don't watch Supernatural.