http://ethicist.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/24/is-it-ok-to-blog-about-this-woman-anonymously/
Chat amongst yourselves. I'm off to save the world (er, so not really, but let's pretend, okay?)
Chat amongst yourselves. I'm off to save the world (er, so not really, but let's pretend, okay?)
no subject
Date: 2009-08-26 02:38 am (UTC)I don't see why, if I want to talk about, say, my thoughts about transsexual porn stars (the subject of an extremely interesting discussion recently on a friend's journal) I should have to provide the world with a permanent record linking those thoughts to my legal name. And, obviously, that's small potatoes compared to the worries of, say, actual transsexuals who enterred the discussion, and were free to provide their views largely because they knew that there was little chance of people connecting the words to the "real world" person.
Of course, in any such discussion, one might get a truly obnoxious troll (I'm using the word in the strong sense, here, of a person who isn't merely unpleasant or pointlessly argumentative, but who attempts to cause genuine harm with their words.) Thus, the lovely ability we have on LJ, and, I would think, most blogging platforms with non-gargantuan readerships, to ban people judged to be genuinely destructive. The judicious operation of such an option seems to me infinitely preferable to the silencing of discussion altogether that would be caused by the insistence upon everyone using legal names.