because y'all like my wardrobe stuff
Sep. 3rd, 2009 01:16 pmSo this morning I finally figured out how to tie a half-windsor. Yes, I was using a shitty knot (four-in-hand) before this. I feel so stupid it took this long for me to get it, although I do lay some of this on being left-handed and so no drawing of this sort of thing can make sense to me ever, but I almost don't care how stupid I feel about having not gotten it, because I am so hideously pleased with myself now.
Of course, this was a random, half-asleep grokking of it, so I'm not actually sure I'm going to be able to repeat the feat, but I think so. Anyway, this knot? fucking superior.
Of course, this was a random, half-asleep grokking of it, so I'm not actually sure I'm going to be able to repeat the feat, but I think so. Anyway, this knot? fucking superior.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 05:29 pm (UTC)A Half-Windsor is hard. I tried to tie a tie with a HW for a Butch-Femme event and it was utter failure. Had to be the Four-in-Hand despite the fact that it should have been a HW.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 05:33 pm (UTC)I think the half-windsor will suit you and be a good addition to your vocabulary. I'm glad to hear it's clicking for you.
[Gah, that reminds me of all kind of knot-tying stuff I've been meaning to research (both modern and historical for my own knowledge) and write about (historical). Thank you for the inspiration.]
no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 05:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 05:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 05:40 pm (UTC)I'd ask you to show me, but seeing as I'm right-handed, it would probably go poorly.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 05:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 05:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 05:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 05:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 05:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 05:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 06:25 pm (UTC)I'm pretty sure much of my own wardrobe fails on at least some of these tests. Finding stuff that fits is harder than is credited, and, since nothing fits OTR, expensive. I think most of us were never taught how to shop for things that fit right.
I've accepted in the last year that the 4IH has its place [see
no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 07:22 pm (UTC)I bought it for a round of job interviews, because in my field (systems administration/IT) nobody wears a suit, or even a tie, if they can help it. However, both of the places I wound up interviewing told me not to wear a tie to the interview (in one case, adding "or you will be mocked") and so I didn't.
The best part? One round of interviews was on April 1, and a bunch of the people I talked to that day were wearing suits as part of a gag...and each of them was quick to reassure me that they didn't really wear a suit and tie normally.
I love this field. A shirt with a collar and pants that aren't denim? That's dressing up (aka my normal workday routine, since I try to stay a notch above the general run of sartorial "splendor" in this crowd).
As an aside, it's been so long since I wore a tie I don't even know which knot I use (though it's probably a four-in-hand); I'd actually have to put one on and tie it to be sure. I do always make sure the knot looks good, so I hope to avoid "the whole thing is often done extremely poorly" as you describe it.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 09:42 pm (UTC)My wardrobe is consequently skewed to the extremes, with a batch of jeans/t-shirts for casual stuff/convention-going, a batch of trousers/shirts for business/casual dance, and then a jump to a 3-piece suit, a tuxedo, and a tailcoat for stuff that requires those levels of formality. [And if you'd asked me 6 years ago, I never would have believed I'd need either a tuxedo or tails, let alone both.]
That whole cowboy thing
Date: 2009-09-03 08:47 pm (UTC)"Learn how to do this right, son. You might have to meet the Queen someday." My Southern daddy used to say this.'Mom told you to say that.' 'She did not. It was your great-grandmother.'
How the West was won. Up here.
Re: That whole cowboy thing
Date: 2009-09-03 09:34 pm (UTC)I certainly didn't mean to imply that cowboys are either sloppy dressers or inappropriately casual, and I'm sorry I ended up doing so.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 09:50 pm (UTC)It makes me sad.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 07:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 06:06 pm (UTC)Congratulations on learning it. I never would have picked it up if not for being shown over and over and over again.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 06:06 pm (UTC)sure you are, you just have to do it half-asleep every time, which I'm sure has its uses :)
congrats!
no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 06:06 pm (UTC)Being ambidextrous, sometimes these sorts of things look backwards to me and sometimes they don't. So I completely understand. Four-in-hand came intuitively for me when I started wearing ties in the 80s.
btw, just looked up directions for the Half Windsor knot and my eyes are now crossed. :o)
no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 06:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 06:22 pm (UTC)I used to like wearing ties when I was younger. But with my ginormous cup size, I suspect they look rather stupid on me now.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 06:33 pm (UTC)The only way I've ever learned to tie new knots is with the system described in The 85 Ways to Tie a Tie (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_85_Ways_to_Tie_a_Tie). It takes five minutes of fussing to figure out how to translate Li Ro Ci Lo Ri Co T into hand movements, but once you do you can easily make modifications for left-handedness and make all fourteen "useful" knots (some of which didn't exist in nature until the mathematical paper that laid out these results, and at least one of which has been described as the most superior IIRC).
no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 06:37 pm (UTC)I had no idea they'd published their ideas further in book form. That's going directly on my to-buy list. Thank you!
no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 06:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 06:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 07:56 pm (UTC)i've tried!
no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 08:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 08:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 11:09 pm (UTC)Speak to me of this.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 11:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 11:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 11:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 11:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-04 03:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-04 09:45 am (UTC)