1. I hate reporting that explains to us why a woman is or is not to blame for her rape and/or murder. A WOMAN IS NOT TO BLAME FOR HER RAPE AND OR MURDER.
2. Annie Le was not the victim of random crime by a stranger. Walking with a group or any of the shit they tell women to do (because our risk is our fault, fuck you very much), would not have protected Annie Le. She was a researcher, doing her research, and she was most likely killed by one of her peers. When the facts come out, will anyone be surprised if she was killed by a male colleague who was angry that her impending marriage made her unavailable to him?
no subject
Date: 2009-09-15 06:04 pm (UTC)*breathes*
Thank you for giving me this space to rant. Or for letting me take this space to rant. Or something. And, yes, to what you wrote.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-15 06:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-15 09:20 pm (UTC)Along with the idea of someone killing her because s/he couldn't have her, I also wonder about the possibility of someone killing her because s/he couldn't BE here--embody her talent, do her research, have her ideas.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-15 09:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-15 09:26 pm (UTC)I am fortunate that I get to read your insightful and very intelligent writing; thank you for the work you do.
(Sorry for my awkward wording and spelling mistakes, I'm post stroke/pre restorative therapy and my brain is doing weird things.)
no subject
Date: 2009-09-16 05:52 am (UTC)You likely can't hear the dry sarcasm in my tone masking my deep fury over the tenure thing.
It wasn't just the classics department, of course. It's just I happened to know a certain plaintiff rather well having been in the classics department when she was denied tenure. she was the best teacher in the department and an excellent scholar and human being with colleagues who thought there shouldn't be women grad students as they should be off making babies, sentiments expressed openly to those grad students. *facepalm*