Page Summary
rednwhiterose.livejournal.com - (no subject)
brewsternorth.livejournal.com - (no subject)
rednwhiterose.livejournal.com - (no subject)
xtricks.livejournal.com - (no subject)
frodo-esque.livejournal.com - (no subject)
luke-jaywalker.livejournal.com - (no subject)
luke-jaywalker.livejournal.com - (no subject)
rm.livejournal.com - (no subject)
luke-jaywalker.livejournal.com - (no subject)
rm.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ladyaelfwynn.livejournal.com - (no subject)
luke-jaywalker.livejournal.com - (no subject)
britgeekgrrl.livejournal.com - (no subject)
luke-jaywalker.livejournal.com - (no subject)
frodo-esque.livejournal.com - (no subject)
hughcasey.livejournal.com - (no subject)
rm.livejournal.com - (no subject)
gallo-de-pelea.livejournal.com - (no subject)
rm.livejournal.com - (no subject)
frodo-esque.livejournal.com - (no subject)
rm.livejournal.com - (no subject)
brewsternorth.livejournal.com - (no subject)
hughcasey.livejournal.com - (no subject)
delle.livejournal.com - (no subject)
hughcasey.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 03:13 pm (UTC)I'm glad to know it's not just me. :O)
no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 03:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 03:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 03:33 pm (UTC)Still, WW2 through 1950s queer love story from a dream? Remains tempting.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 03:37 pm (UTC)Was horrified enough to make a passionate post in response to this. Think I may be too sensitive to handle it right now.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 03:41 pm (UTC)You're seeing it as the journalist implying the victim was in some way at fault; I'm seeing it as a relevant circumstance. When a man is reported to have been mugged in a dark alley, nobody's implying that the man even slightly deserved to be mugged because he entered the dark alley.
On the other hand, it's a data point to avoid dark alleys. Or excessive drinking.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 03:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 03:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 03:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 03:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 03:47 pm (UTC)There are at least two incidents that I was involved in as a 15-16 year old where I was waiting after dark at school for my ride to show...
**shudder**
It's kind of crazy how things that happened 25 years ago can be brought back so vividly and so easily by a news story.
I hope they get the bastards....
no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 03:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 03:50 pm (UTC)My morning paper did much the same - mentioning that she'd been met by friends and gotten drunk.
Glad I wasn't alone in shrieking "What has THAT got to do with it?" at the paper this AM...
no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 03:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 03:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 03:54 pm (UTC)It is relevant because, if she was intoxicated, she was legally unable to consent. This means that the defense cannot claim that she consented. So it is relevant to the case, and it is relevant in favor of the young woman.
Of course, not everyone will choose to see it that way, but that it because many people are stupid. :-\
no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 03:55 pm (UTC)Obviously, getting randomly trashed no matter who you are in any circumstance, isn't awesome decision making. But this girl was gang-raped. Sober, a gang of men would still have been able to overpower her and rape her. She was sober when she went to hang out with the men. She wasn't raped because she was drunk. She was raped because she had the bad fortune to be associating with men who are rapists. Conservative estimates indicate that 1 in 6 women are a victim of a sexual assault in their lifetimes. Even if each man who rapes or commits sexual assault commits ten of these, that's still 1 in 60 men who are rapists. Statistically the odds are terrible, and living in fear doesn't make them better.
http://postbourgie.com/2009/09/18/sexual-assault-prevention-tips-guaranteed-to-work/
no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 03:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 03:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 03:56 pm (UTC)Sure there are creepo's out there, but staying clear of drinking should not be something a woman should need to do in order to stay safe.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 03:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 04:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 04:06 pm (UTC)However, the ONLY way that her being intoxicated works in the defendent's favor is if she actually SAID, "Why SURE! I'd just LOVE a gangbang! But I'll need to get drunk first!" Which (call it a hunch) I really , really doubt she said. (Not that I haven't known people who WOULD say that, but hey, whatever floats your boat...)
no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 04:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 04:17 pm (UTC)